富达年中复盘:2026 年数字资产的 6 大关键趋势

marsbit2026-06-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

富达数字资产研究团队在2026年年中复盘报告中,梳理了年初展望中提出的六大关键趋势进展,认为数字资产领域正在进行结构性“重塑”。 1. **数字资产与传统资本市场加速整合**:趋势持续且快于预期。现货比特币ETP期权未平仓合约激增,代币化领域活跃,监管框架(如SEC/CFTC指南)趋于清晰,推动数字资产进一步融入主流金融体系。 2. **代币持有者权利受关注但仍不明朗**:生态内相关机制(如回购、治理重组)的试验在继续,但市场尚未对此形成明确的“权利溢价”定价,该趋势仍处早期。 3. **人工智能算力需求可能影响比特币挖矿**:比特币算力与挖矿难度出现下降,虽部分受季节性因素影响,但增长放缓的长期趋势与AI算力竞争加剧的预测相符,矿工可能正转向更有利可图的AI数据中心业务。 4. **比特币网络处于新的转折点**:OP_RETURN数据上限放宽未导致网络滥用或臃肿。当前焦点转向网络动态,Bitcoin Knots节点占比约17%,虽引发对潜在分裂风险的讨论,但Bitcoin Core(占比77%)仍主导共识。同时,抗量子计算等长期安全升级研究获得进展。 5. **空头暂时掌控市场局面**:年初至今,受清算去杠杆、高通胀及地缘政治不确定性影响,熊市情景占上风,比特币价格下跌。但近期在地缘冲突后,比特币展现出避险属性,跑赢部分传统资产,且机构参与、监管清晰度提升等结构性利好依然存在。 6. **黄金保持强势,去美元化趋势显现**:黄金在央行购金及去美元化趋势支撑下表现强劲。有证据显示比特币开始在一些国际贸易场景(如伊朗)作为支付手段被使用,但比特币紧随黄金优异表现的情景尚未出现。 **结论**:当前数字资产市场呈现短期压力与长期结构性进展并存的局面。投资者需超越价格波动,关注机构融合、监管、基础设施等领域的实质推进,这些正为下一阶段增长积蓄力量。

作者:Fidelity Digital Assets

编译:佳欢,ChainCatcher

年中是个不错的检视节点,投资者可以借此评估市场动态有何变化、年初的判断是否依然成立。

在《2026年展望》中,Fidelity Digital Assets 研究团队认为,今年的关键并不在于价格立刻上涨,而是一种更微妙的动态,即整个数字资产生态的结构性“重塑”。尽管今年以来价格表现时而平淡、时而起伏,但深入观察会发现,其中几个底层趋势正在不断推进。

本文梳理《2026年展望》中几个关键主题至今的进展,指出我们的判断哪些得到印证、哪些出现分歧,以及这些变化对未来可能意味着什么。

1: 数字资产与资本市场加速整合

我们曾预计 2026 年数字资产与传统资本市场的融合将继续推进。到目前为止,这一趋势确实在向前走,某些领域的推进速度甚至快于预期。

尽管大盘有所波动,通过主流金融渠道获取数字资产敞口的需求依然坚挺,传统平台也在继续扩充产品线。

值得注意的是,现货比特币 ETP 期权(这类产品最早 2024 年 11 月才推出)的未平仓合约,如今已能与直接以比特币结算的期权相媲美,反映出机构和主流投资者的采用率正在持续上升。

代币化领域的势头也在增强,活跃度似乎超出预期。传统金融机构正越来越多地推出基于区块链的投资产品,大型交易所则在与数字资产平台合作或收购其股份,以拓宽分销渠道、对接链上基础设施。

与此同时,监管层面也在变得更清晰。美国证券交易委员会(SEC)和商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)联合发布了确立数字资产分类的指南,加上《CLARITY 法案》等立法的推进,意味着市场参与者将迎来一个更明确的框架。

综合来看,这些进展表明数字资产正持续融入更广泛的金融体系,市场需求与基础设施扩建共同推动了这一趋势。

2: 代币持有者权利逐渐获得关注,但仍不明朗

我们曾预计 2026 年,代币持有者的利益绑定会变得更紧密,更多链上企业会优先考虑回购、更明确的所有权等机制。

到目前为止,这一方向看来没有改变,整个生态的试验仍在继续:从基于储备的回购动态(例如 Hyperliquid/USDC 联盟),到 Aave DAO/Labs 重组这类治理和结构层面的更新。

不过,尽管这些机制的采用范围在扩大,明显的“代币持有者权利溢价”还没有在市场定价中完全体现。这一趋势在推进,但仍处于早期,投资者还在判断哪些模式能真正带来持续的价值积累。

3: 人工智能与挖矿的潜在转变

我们曾提出,来自 AI 算力需求的竞争加剧,可能让比特币算力增长趋于平稳,因为矿工会把能源和基础设施重新投向可能更赚钱的方向。今年以来,这种动态可能正在显现:30 天平均算力和挖矿难度分别下降了约 8.8% 和 7.8%。

虽然其中部分可归因于季节性因素,尤其是冬季相关的限电,但近期的复苏(算力较低点回升约 1.3%,难度回升约 8.8%)表明,单靠天气无法完全解释这种转变。

从更长的轨迹看,算力的增长速度相比往年已经放缓,这或许是结构性变化的早期信号。AI 数据中心的业务越来越有利可图,尤其对那些能拿到电力基础设施的大型运营商而言,这一点似乎越来越可能是背后的推手。

尽管仍处早期,但观察到的增长放缓与最初的判断相符,可能反映出矿工正逐步转向其他收入来源。

4:比特币处于新的转折点

我们曾预计,提高 OP_RETURN 操作码可写入的数据量,不会让区块链明显膨胀(OP_RETURN 用于链上写入数据,因需支付手续费,放宽其数据上限并未导致滥用或网络臃肿)。到目前为止,数据似乎支持这一判断。

较大尺寸(≥84 字节)的 OP_RETURN 使用量基本没变,区块链的总体增长也仍保持在预测区间内(约 1.35–2.5MB)。其他区块利用率指标显示,容量仍低于 50%,说明数据灵活性的提升并未对网络造成实质压力。

与此同时,焦点已转向更宏观的网络动态。Bitcoin Knots 节点出现明显波动,快速上升又快速回落,引发了对潜在类女巫(Sybil-like)活动的猜测。

根据当前数据,Bitcoin Core 节点仍占网络约 77%,Knots 节点约占 17%。 虽然仍是少数,但这带来了意外分裂的风险——概率不高,却并非为零:在某些条件下,Knots 节点可能分化成一条停滞或安全性更低的链,按目前的推算,这种情况可能在约 80 天内出现。

不过,Core 的主导份额仍在锚定网络共识。与此同时,围绕长期安全升级的势头也在增强。BIP-360 经过简化,引入了抗量子的输出类型(Pay-to-Merkle-Root,简称 P2MR);正在进行的 OP_CHECKSHRINCS 研究,则体现了对基于哈希的后量子签名方案的探索。

虽然出现量子威胁的具体时间暂无定论,但这些进展说明,业界正越来越重视为网络的未来安全早做准备。

5: 空头暂时掌控局面

今年 1 月,我们勾勒了进入 2026 年时牛熊势均力敌的两种情景,预计宏观条件会让走势呈非线性,尽管结构性基本面在改善。

今年以来,熊市情景在很大程度上占了上风:比特币下跌 13%,背后是清算引发的去杠杆、通胀居高不下,以及地缘政治不确定性令市场转向预期进一步加息。 不过,近期的市场表现透出一种更微妙的动态。

在近期地缘政治冲突引发的最初一轮抛售之后,比特币出现反弹,并在同一时期跑赢了传统资产,这或许反映出在压力时期,市场对高流动性、中立资产的需求。

与此同时,结构性利好依然存在,包括机构资本的持续形成、监管清晰度的逐步提升,以及全球流动性的扩大。

尽管短期环境仍受制约,但我们更宏观的判断似乎依然成立,只是推进得并不平稳。

6: 黄金强势保持,接下来会发生什么?

我们曾指出,黄金再迎强劲一年并不意外,背后的支撑是央行购金需求,以及全球逐步摆脱美元体系的趋势。

今年以来,黄金先是在地缘政治紧张中反弹近 30%,随后回落到约 3–4% 的更温和涨幅。 尽管出现回调,黄金仍可能在年底前跑赢大盘。

支持摆脱美元体系的证据也越来越多,其中包括一些新出现的替代结算方式,例如伊朗接受用比特币支付通行费,以及与霍尔木兹海峡活动相关的付款。

同时,央行对黄金的需求依然强劲。近期数据显示增持仍在继续,值得注意的是,黄金已超过美元和美国国债,成为全球储备中的主要构成。

黄金的表现与央行的持续需求,跟我们最初的判断基本一致;而我们预期中比特币随后的优异表现,目前尚未出现。

结论:在表象之下积蓄力量

行至年中,2026 年的数字资产格局呈现出短期压力与长期进展之间的平衡。《展望》中的几个主题正按预期发展,尤其是在机构参与、监管和基础设施方面;但另一些仍处于早期,或尚未完全兑现。

对投资者而言,这说明要越过短期价格波动,去看结构性转变如何成形。支撑下一阶段增长的许多地基似乎正在变厚,即便还没完全显现出来。

İlgili Sorular

Q富达数字资产在《2026年展望》中提出的6大关键趋势是什么?

A富达数字资产在《2026年展望》中提出的6大关键趋势分别是:1. 数字资产与资本市场加速整合;2. 代币持有者权利逐渐获得关注,但仍不明朗;3. 人工智能与挖矿的潜在转变;4. 比特币处于新的转折点;5. 空头暂时掌控局面;6. 黄金强势保持,接下来会发生什么?

Q在趋势一“数字资产与资本市场加速整合”中,有哪些具体进展体现了融合速度比预期更快?

A具体进展包括:1. 现货比特币ETP期权的未平仓合约已能与比特币结算的期权相媲美,反映出机构和主流投资者采用率持续上升。2. 代币化领域势头增强,传统金融机构正越来越多地推出基于区块链的投资产品。3. 大型交易所与数字资产平台合作或收购其股份,以拓宽分销渠道。4. 监管层面变得更清晰,美国SEC和CFTC发布了数字资产分类指南,《CLARITY法案》等立法也在推进。

Q文章提到比特币算力增长放缓可能是什么原因导致的?

A文章分析,比特币算力增长放缓的原因可能不仅是季节性因素(如冬季限电),更可能是一个结构性变化的早期信号。主要推手被认为是AI数据中心业务的利润越来越高,矿工可能会将能源和基础设施重新投向可能更赚钱的AI算力方向。

Q关于比特币网络,文章提到了哪两个潜在的技术或安全变化?

A文章提到了两个潜在的技术或安全变化:1. 由于Bitcoin Knots节点数量出现明显波动,引发了关于潜在类女巫活动的猜测,并带来了意外分裂的风险,虽然概率不高。2. 围绕长期安全升级的势头增强,包括引入抗量子的输出类型(P2MR)的BIP-360,以及正在进行的对后量子签名方案的探索(如OP_CHECKSHRINCS)。

Q文章中如何描述当前市场(至年中)的短期表现与长期基本面之间的关系?

A文章认为,当前的数字资产格局呈现出短期压力与长期进展之间的平衡。短期来看,熊市情景占据上风,比特币价格下跌,市场受到去杠杆、高通胀和地缘政治不确定性等因素制约。但从长期来看,支撑下一阶段增长的许多结构性基本面正在变厚和推进,例如机构参与、监管清晰度和全球流动性扩大等利好因素依然存在。投资者应越过短期价格波动,关注这些正在成形的结构性转变。

İlgili Okumalar

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbit2 dk önce

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbit2 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手18 dk önce

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手18 dk önce

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbit18 dk önce

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbit18 dk önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit1 saat önce

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片