观点:alt.fun 上的代币是双层杠杆

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-18Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-18

Introduzione

本文解析了alt.fun平台上ALT等代币的双层杠杆结构。这些代币并非简单的HYPE 5倍杠杆,而是在HYPE 5倍杠杆代币(HYPE5L)之上,又叠加了一层由AMM(自动化做市商)交易池构成的杠杆。 具体机制如下:ALT的价格由两个独立因子相乘决定: 1. AMM比价:由alt.fun上ALT与HYPE5L的交易供需决定。 2. LT净值:即HYPE5L自身的净值,由底层HYPE价格的5倍杠杆变化决定。 当HYPE价格上涨时,HYPE5L净值约涨5%。这可能吸引买家购入ALT,推高AMM比价,使ALT总涨幅可能达到8%-15%,高于5倍。下跌时同理,跌幅可能扩大至8%-15%,且由于赎回路径限制,大额卖单可能无法成交,导致后入场者面临流动性风险。 与使用SOL作为配对资产的pump.fun相比,alt.fun使用已带5倍杠杆的HYPE5L作为配对资产,使得其代币的整体风险敞口和波动性被抬升到完全不同的量级。用户在界面看到“HYPE 5x Long”标签时,实际买入的是底层5倍杠杆与AMM浮动杠杆叠加的二阶产品,在趋势市中收益可能显著高于5倍,但在震荡市和崩盘时风险也急剧放大。

作者:798.eth

alt.fun 上的 alt 代币,不是 HYPE 5 倍杠杆。是 HYPE 5 倍杠杆上面再叠一层 AMM 杠杆。

这件事用直觉看不出来。看一遍机制就明白。先放当前数据,方便对照。

HYPE 现货价 42.84 USDC。

HYPE5L(BounceTech 发的 HYPE 5 倍 long 杠杆代币 LT)当前 NAV 0.870 USDC,比发行价 1 USDC 衰减了 13%。

alt.fun 平台旗舰代币 ALT 的 HyperSwap V2 池子里,ALT 1858 万枚,HYPE5L 12.94 万枚。1 个 ALT 等于 0.00697 个 HYPE5L。换算 USDC 价 0.00606。ALT 在 USDC 里的价格,是两个东西的乘积。

注意: 毕业后,池子里没有 USDC,配对资产是 HYPE5L LT。这一点是所有理解的起点。

ALT 的 USDC 价 = 池子里 ALT 兑 HYPE5L 的兑换率 乘以 HYPE5L 当前 NAV。

第一个因子叫 AMM 比价。池子里 ALT 越少 HYPE5L 越多,比价越高,也就是 ALT 更贵。反过来就更便宜。这个因子由买卖盘力量决定,跟 HYPE 价格无关。

第二个因子叫 LT 净值。HYPE 涨 1%,HYPE5L 净值涨约 5%,反之亦然。这个因子由 BounceTech 在 Hyperliquid 上的真实 perp 仓位决定,跟 alt.fun 的交易活动无关。

两个因子互相独立。乘起来才是 ALT 的最终 USDC 价。

为什么这构成双层杠杆。

HYPE 涨 1%。

第二层(LT)放大到 5%。HYPE5L 净值涨 5%。

第一层(AMM)会跟着放大。HYPE5L 涨,持有 HYPE5L 的人发现自己在赚钱,一部分会去 alt.fun 上买更多 alt 代币(杠杆敞口加 alt 故事敞口)。这一买,池子里 HYPE5L 增加 ALT 减少,AMM 比价上升。同样的 1% HYPE 涨幅,在 AMM 这一层又被放大一次。

最终 ALT 的 USDC 价涨幅大概率在 8% 到 15% 之间,跟 AMM 池子深度和买盘强度相关。但永远大于 5%。

跌的时候同样道理,方向反过来。HYPE 跌 1%,HYPE5L 跌 5%,alt 持有者发现损失放大,部分人开始卖 ALT 换 HYPE5L 想 redeem。卖压把 AMM 比价压下来,ALT 的 USDC 跌幅大概率在 8% 到 15%。

跌的时候还有一个不对称效应。alt.fun docs 自己提示,大单卖出会因为路径非原子化而 revert(alt 先换 HYPE5L 再 redeem 成 USDC 这条链路,单子大了 BounceTech 那边的 LT redemption 撑不住)。意思是池子薄的时候,散户想止损是止不掉的。第一波跑出来的人按高价出,后面的人按低价出,再后面的人卡在合约里出不来。

ALT、HBULL、HYPE 人生、BALD、HLC 这五个 HYPE5L 背书的 alt 代币现在都 graduated。它们在 HyperSwap V2 上的交易,每一笔都在动 AMM 比价。同时 HYPE 价格在动 HYPE5L 净值。两层在叠加。

HYPE5L 是 BounceTech 发的 LT。理论 5 倍敞口,实际因为 rebalance 频繁触发,会带波动率折损。震荡市里实际敞口低于 5 倍,趋势市里高于 5 倍。

所以你打开 alt.fun UI 看到一个写着「HYPE 5x Long」的 alt 代币,UI 上展示的 USDC 价,背后是 HYPE 价格经过 BounceTech 5 倍杠杆放大,再经过 HyperSwap V2 AMM 放大一次的结果。你以为自己买的是 HYPE 的 5 倍敞口,实际买的是 8 到 15 倍的浮动敞口。

涨的时候这种浮动敞口让你赚得比 5 倍多,跌的时候让你亏得比 5 倍多。这就是双层杠杆的全部含义。

跟 pump.fun 对照能看得更清楚。

pump.fun 上的代币配对资产是 SOL。SOL 是 1 倍敞口的现货。SOL 跌 10%,pump.fun 代币的 USDC 价跌 10% 加上 AMM 卖压幅度,大概 15% 到 25%。AMM 是放大器,但底层不带杠杆。

alt.fun 上的代币配对资产是 HYPE5L。HYPE5L 已经是 5 倍敞口的衍生品。HYPE 跌 10%,HYPE5L 跌 50%,alt 代币的 USDC 价跌 50% 加上 AMM 卖压幅度,大概 60% 到 80%。AMM 是放大器,底层本身已经带 5 倍杠杆。

同样是 launchpad,同样是 AMM 配对,alt.fun 因为换了 quote asset,整体风险曲线被拉到完全不同的量级。这件事在 alt.fun 的 UI 上没有任何显眼提示。

最后一句给散户。

你点开 alt.fun,看见一个「HYPE 5x Long」标签的代币,凭直觉以为这是 HYPE 的 5 倍杠杆敞口。这个直觉错了。

底层杠杆是 5 倍。AMM 这一层会再加 1 到 2 倍的浮动敞口。趋势市里你跑赢 5 倍很多。震荡市里波动率折损吃你的肉。崩盘时大单卖不动,先跑的人按高价出,后跑的人卡在合约里。

这不是 HYPE 5 倍 long。是 HYPE 5 倍 long 套了一层 AMM 杠杆的二阶产品。

不是投资建议,只是想把事情想清楚。

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

Qalt.fun 平台上的 alt 代币与 HYPE 现货价格之间存在怎样的双层杠杆关系?

Aalt.fun 上的 alt 代币通过两个独立的因子与 HYPE 价格挂钩:第一,与 HYPE 挂钩的杠杆代币(如 HYPE5L)提供底层约5倍杠杆敞口;第二,alt 代币在 HyperSwap V2 的 AMM 池中与 HYPE5L 配对交易,买卖压力会形成第二层价格放大。两层因子相乘,使得 alt 代币对 HYPE 价格波动的实际敞口(尤其在趋势市中)通常在 8 到 15 倍之间,形成双层杠杆效应。

Q在 alt.fun 的机制中,影响 ALT 代币 USDC 价格的两个独立因子分别是什么?它们是如何作用的?

A第一个因子是 AMM 比价,即 AMM 池中 ALT 与配对资产 HYPE5L 的兑换比率,由买卖盘力量决定,与 HYPE 价格无关。第二个因子是 HYPE5L 的净值,它由 BounceTech 在 Hyperliquid 上对应的永续合约仓位决定,对 HYPE 现货价格波动提供约5倍杠杆敞口。ALT 的 USDC 价格等于这两个因子相乘,因此 HYPE 价格变动会被 HYPE5L 的杠杆放大,再被 AMM 的买卖压力进一步放大。

Q当 HYPE 价格下跌时,alt.fun 上的代币持有者可能面临何种不对称风险?

A当 HYPE 价格下跌时,持有者会面临双重放大的亏损。首先,底层 HYPE5L 净值会以约5倍杠杆下跌;其次,恐慌性抛售会加大 AMM 池的卖压,进一步压低 alt 代币的价格,导致实际跌幅远超5倍。此外,文章指出大额卖单可能因兑换路径非原子化而失败(即 alt 代币兑换 HYPE5L,再赎回为 USDC 的链路可能拥堵),这意味着后期想止损的散户可能无法及时卖出,流动性风险加剧。

Qalt.fun 上的代币与 pump.fun 上的代币在风险结构上最主要的区别是什么?

A最主要的区别在于配对资产的杠杆属性不同。pump.fun 的代币配对资产是 SOL(1倍现货敞口),其风险主要来自 SOL 的现货波动加上 AMM 的放大效应。而 alt.fun 的代币配对资产是 HYPE5L,这本身就是对 HYPE 的约5倍杠杆衍生品。因此,alt.fun 的代币底层就带有5倍杠杆,再叠加 AMM 放大,使其整体风险曲线远高于 pump.fun 的代币,在下跌行情中亏损可能更为剧烈。

Q文章作者认为,散户对 alt.fun 上标有“HYPE 5x Long”的代币存在何种常见的误解?

A作者指出,散户常见的误解是以为购买此类代币只是获得了 HYPE 的5倍杠杆敞口。但实际上,由于该代币在 AMM 池中与已经是5倍杠杆的 HYPE5L 配对交易,其最终风险敞口是两层杠杆的叠加:底层 HYPE5L 提供的约5倍杠杆,加上 AMM 买卖盘带来的额外浮动放大(在趋势市中通常使总敞口达到8到15倍)。因此,实际风险远高于直观理解的5倍杠杆产品。

Letture associate

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit15 min fa

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit15 min fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit26 min fa

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit26 min fa

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit30 min fa

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit30 min fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit35 min fa

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit35 min fa

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手40 min fa

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手40 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare HYPE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Hyperliquid (HYPE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente HyperliquidHYPE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Hyperliquid (HYPE)Dopo aver acquistato Hyperliquid (HYPE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Hyperliquid (HYPE)Scambia facilmente Hyperliquid (HYPE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

292 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare HYPE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di HYPE HYPE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片