案均超1亿美元,盘点今年以来加密市场的10大安全事件

PanewsPublished on 2022-08-16Last updated on 2022-08-16

Abstract

2022年上半年,安全事件共计187起,损失近20亿美元,本文将盘点其中10大安全事件。

2022年上半年,安全事件共计187起,损失近20亿美元,本文将盘点其中10大安全事件。

2022 以来,加密行业黑客攻击事件频发。根据慢雾发布的一份报告显示,2022 年上半年,加密黑客攻击安全事件共计 187 起,损失高达近 20 亿美元。加密 KOL Sabo 在个人社交媒体平台上梳理了 2022 年至今十大 Crypto 黑客攻击事件,BlockBeats 对其整理翻译如下:

1. Crypto.com(1 月 17 日,3500 万美元)

一名黑客禁用了该加密交易平台的双重身份验证(2FA),导致客户资金损失共计 4,836 枚以太坊和 443 枚比特币。所有受影响客户最终都得到了全额损失补偿。

2. Qubit(1 月 27 日,8000 万美元)

黑客通过一个智能合约漏洞从 Qubit 的 QBridge 协议中窃取 206,809 枚 BNB,这些资产被盗时价值超过 8000 万美元。开发团队被迫解散,协议变更为由 DAO 进行管理。

案均超1亿美元,盘点今年以来加密市场的10大安全事件

3. Wormhole(2 月 2 日,3.25 亿美元)

Wormhole 事件中黑客利用 SOL-ETH 跨链桥上的智能合约,在未存入任何抵押品的情况下提取现金。损失的资金由加密风投 Jump Crypto 补足。

4. IRA FT(2 月 8 日,3700 万美元)

IRA Financial Trust 是一个以加密货币为重点的退休和养老金平台。黑客以某种方式掌握了「万能钥匙」后入侵 IRA。IRA 的客户账户由 Gemini 保管,IRA 就黑客攻击事件向 Gemini 提起诉讼,指控其涉嫌疏忽对客户的资产保护。

5. Cashio(3 月 22 日,5200 万美元)

黑客用无价值的抵押品「无限」铸造 Cashio 的 Stablecoin CASH。CASH 发生严重脱锚,至今未恢复。

案均超1亿美元,盘点今年以来加密市场的10大安全事件

6. Axie Infinity(3 月 28 日,6.25 亿美元)

Ronin 桥黑客事件是有史以来以法币计最大的加密黑客事件。黑客们控制了大部分的加密密钥。当一个 Axie 的开发者点击了一个假的 offer PDF 文件时,4/9 的验证节点密钥被盗。

7. Beanstalk(4 月 17 日,1.82 亿美元)

黑客使用「闪电贷」来接管 Stablecoin 的治理协议。资金在同一交易中不断被借入和偿还。黑客通过了一个向乌克兰捐赠资金的提案,并偷走了剩余的抵押品。

8. Fei Protocol(4 月 30 日,8000 万美元)

借贷协议代码中的一个 bug 允许黑客在贷款的同时收回贷款的抵押物。Fei DAO 替黑客偿还了这笔坏账。Stablecoin FEI 保持了 1 美元的锚定。

9. Harmony(6 月 23 日,1 亿美元)

臭名昭著的朝鲜黑客组织 Lazarus 掌握了 2/5 的安全密钥并拿来批准交易。资产从 Horizon 桥上被盗,这座跨链桥让资产能够在 Harmony 与以太坊和 BNB Chain 之前流动。

10. Nomad(8 月 1 日,1.9 亿美元)

Nomad 一个智能合约的更新使用户很容易进行欺骗交易,从 Nomad 桥上取钱。白帽黑客已经归还了价值 3330 万美元的资金。

反思

去年,我们面临的更多是社会工程攻击。但在 2022 年,我们转向了更多的代码漏洞和闪光贷款。攻击者不再依赖大量的人上当受骗,而是能够直接攻击 DeFi 协议。

没有一条链能够处理全球所有交易量。因此,尽管还没有到达大规模采用的时机,我们似乎正不可避免地走向多链未来。这解释了对跨链桥的需求,以及为什么我们需要保护它们。

2022 年最大的黑客攻击源自攻击者发现跨链桥和闪电贷协议的漏洞。未来,有必要对每一行代码进行智能合约审计,包括在启动前或任何时候改动代码。

2022 年也是迄今为止朝鲜黑客组织收获颇丰的一年。随着 Tornado Cash 制裁在加密行业开创先例,黑客们将会转向何处?下一个承受美国乃至全球监管机构怒火的又会是谁?

Related Reads

Bitcoin at 59,000 Is Not the Bottom, One Last Drop Needed! Chain Data and Liquidity Analysis: Where is BTC's True Bottom?

Based on analysis by trader Mr. Beggar, Bitcoin's (BTC) recent low of $59k is likely not the final cycle bottom. He argues that while a bottom is near, a final downward movement is still probable to target liquidity below that level, making a deeper low healthier for a sustainable reversal. Mr. Beggar's framework combines on-chain data for long-term cycles and liquidity-based technical analysis for shorter-term trades. His "four deep bear buying models" include Cointime Price (market cost weighted by coin holding time) and AVIV (an enhanced MVRV indicator), which currently suggest prices are nearing cyclical bottom zones. While a PSIP (Percent Supply in Profit) signal has flashed below 50%, it alone is not considered definitive; typically, the first signal is not the final bottom. He presents three potential scenarios for the current market: 1) a direct drop from here, 2) an upward liquidity sweep (stop hunt) of the recent high near $67.3k before declining, and 3) a direct reversal without new lows. He heavily discounts the third scenario due to significant un-swept liquidity in the $59k-$62.3k range, suggesting the market must revisit these levels. Mr. Beggar shares that he used on-chain signals to identify potential cycle tops in late 2024/early 2025 and later established low-leverage BTC-denominated short positions. He emphasizes the importance of risk management and staying within one's expertise ("strike zone"), warning against investing in assets like AI/semiconductor stocks simply because they are rising.

marsbit3m ago

Bitcoin at 59,000 Is Not the Bottom, One Last Drop Needed! Chain Data and Liquidity Analysis: Where is BTC's True Bottom?

marsbit3m ago

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Trading on Polymarket?

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Polymarket Trading The surge in trading demand on prediction markets like Polymarket, especially during events like the World Cup, exposes a common challenge for novice users: emotional and impulsive trading due to a lack of stable strategies and reliable signals. Prediction Position Platform (PPP) addresses this by serving as a Telegram-based tool for strategy discovery and automated copy-trading on Polymarket. PPP offers a suite of features through a subscription model. Key functionalities include 24/7 market signal monitoring (tracking smart money movements and rapid probability shifts), an "AI Address Analysis" tool to evaluate trader performance metrics, and specialized sections like a "World Cup Zone" for quick access to related markets. Its core value lies in two curated lists: the "Strategy Square," which identifies addresses suitable for long-term tracking based on comprehensive metrics like returns, win rate, and drawdowns, and the "Trading Leaderboard," highlighting recently outperforming addresses for short-term opportunities. Users can manually analyze any address or set up automated copy-trading with customizable parameters like investment amount and stop-loss. After initiating copy-trades, users can manage all positions from a unified dashboard, adjusting parameters or stopping follows as needed, and review historical performance data. Crucially, PPP employs a non-custodial wallet model, meaning user funds remain in their own self-custodied wallets, enhancing security and trust. In summary, PPP aims to reduce the learning curve and trial-and-error cost for Polymarket users by aggregating signals, curating and analyzing profitable traders, and facilitating automated, yet manageable, copy-trading execution.

Odaily星球日报3m ago

From Signal Monitoring to Strategy Copy Trading: How PPP Lowers the Barrier to Trading on Polymarket?

Odaily星球日报3m ago

From the White-Haired Stock God to the Billion-Dollar Fund Titan: The Smart People Shorting NVIDIA Are Getting Rich Using the Same Framework

From "white-haired stock god" to billionaire fund manager, those profiting from shorting NVIDIA share a common framework. The article analyzes the critical bottlenecks in the AI hardware supply chain, which have become key investment focal points. The core argument is that the real constraint on the AI boom isn't software or algorithms, but fundamental physical infrastructure. The piece dissects nine major bottlenecks, organized around the lifecycle of an AI accelerator circuit board. *Before the Board*: The pre-manufacturing stage faces constraints in EDA tools, new materials (like GaN, SiC, InP) replacing silicon, and the critical, non-renewable supply of helium for semiconductor fabrication. *On the Board*: The primary bottlenecks are High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for unleashing GPU power, and advanced packaging (e.g., CoWoS), required to integrate components. Both are in severe shortage. *Between Boards*: Chip-to-chip communication is hitting limits with copper, pushing photonics and optical interconnects (CPO) as the next-gen solution, with NVIDIA heavily investing in this area. *Around the Board*: Power delivery requires new materials (GaN/SiC) for efficient voltage conversion from 48V to sub-1V. High-density AI racks (120kW+) are forcing a shift from air to liquid cooling as the standard. *Beyond the Board*: The ultimate bottleneck is electricity. AI data centers consume power equivalent to mid-sized cities, and grid expansion lags far behind demand, causing project delays and a scramble for power contracts. Prominent investors like Leopold and "white-haired stock god" are heavily betting on these infrastructure bottlenecks. Leopold's fund, for instance, holds no NVIDIA stock but uses massive put options to short the semiconductor sector while going long on power and physical infrastructure. His thesis is that while chip competition may eventually erode margins, the scarcity of foundational elements like electricity is more persistent. The framework's validity is tied to the supply-demand gap. Major new capacity in HBM and photonics is scheduled for 2027-2028, but demand continues to outpace it. Experts like Intel's CEO suggest no relief before 2028. However, the article warns of a potential reversal around 2028-2029 if AI capex slows and new capacity floods the market, turning scarcity into oversupply. Until then, the imbalance persists.

链捕手34m ago

From the White-Haired Stock God to the Billion-Dollar Fund Titan: The Smart People Shorting NVIDIA Are Getting Rich Using the Same Framework

链捕手34m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片