Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) on the Move: Can This 6% Surge Fuel a Bigger Trend?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-25Last updated on 2026-03-25

Abstract

Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) has launched the Pengu Card in partnership with KAST, a Visa-based card usable in over 170 countries and 150 million merchants, offering cardholders rewards of up to 12%. Concurrently, the PENGU token surged 6.76%, trading around $0.007460, with its market cap near $468.93 million and daily trading volume up over 19% to $102.6 million. Technical analysis suggests a potential rise to $0.007658 if bullish momentum continues, possibly reaching $0.007839 or higher. Conversely, a bearish move could drop the price to $0.007240 or lower. Indicators show mixed signals: MACD hints at building bullish momentum, CMF indicates mild buying pressure, and BBP suggests market indecision. The RSI at 66.01 leans bullish but nears overbought territory.

Pudgy Penguins has launched the Visa network-based Pengu Card, in partnership with KAST. It can be used in more than 170 countries worldwide and at over 150 million merchants. With the Pengu Card, payments can be made, and the cardholders can receive rewards of up to 12%.

Meanwhile, the token, PENGU, rose 6.76%, trading within the $0.007460 mark at the time of writing. The market cap is settled at around $468.93 million, and the daily trading volume of Pudgy Penguins has increased by over 19.22%, reaching the $102.6 million range.

Upon the bullish impulse intensifying in the four-hour trading window, the Pudgy Penguins price could rise to the $0.007658 resistance level. If the upside pressure stays and turns sturdy, the golden cross might take place and send the price toward $0.007839 or even higher.

Assuming PENGU initiates a move on the downside, the price might slip to the support range at $0.007240. With an extended bearish correction, the death cross would unfold, which may push the asset’s price to the former low, below the $0.007002 mark.

Pudgy Penguins Technical Outlook: Bullish or Bearish Signals?

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line of PENGU is above the zero line, but the signal line is still below it, which indicates that the early bullish momentum is building up. The trend is turning upward, and if this continues, it will develop a stronger bullish move.

Additionally, Pudgy Penguins’ Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator resting at 0.07 suggests mild buying pressure. There is a steady inflow of money, but it is not aggressive, with quiet accumulation. Notably, this points to a slight upward bias, as long as that inflow continues.

PENGU’s Bull-Bear Power (BBP) reading of 0.000508 is almost flat, with a bare difference between buyers and sellers right now—no strength on either side. The market is undecided, pointing to sideways movement, unless the momentum starts to build.

Moreover, the daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) is stationed at 66.01 infers the market is strongly leaning bullish. Buyers are in control, and the price has been moving up. It may approach the overbought zone, and if it climbs further, it may get stretched.

Top Updated Crypto News

Solana (SOL) on Edge: Building Strength or Showing Signs of Weakness?

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

Bitcoin is diverging from a record-high global M2 money supply (over $135 trillion), challenging the historical assumption that rising liquidity directly lifts BTC prices. While a bullish view suggests Bitcoin is merely lagging and will eventually catch up as capital rotates into riskier assets, a more cautious "regime-change" argument posits that factors like spot ETFs, institutional flows, and a stronger dollar may have weakened the direct correlation. For traders, this divergence presents a clear macro question to monitor: whether Bitcoin's price will confirm a delayed rally or signal a lasting change in its relationship with global liquidity. The outcome will shape how future liquidity data is interpreted.

bitcoinist24m ago

Bitcoin Decouples From Global M2 Liquidity As Money Supply Hits Record High

bitcoinist24m ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit34m ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit34m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit44m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit44m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit54m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit54m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit1h ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy PENGU

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)After purchasing your Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Pudgy Penguins (PENGU)Easily trade Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.12.23Updated 2026.06.02

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PENGU (PENGU) are presented below.