Bitcoin’s ’10 AM dumps’ stop as Jane Street gets sued: ‘That’s all it took!’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-26Last updated on 2026-02-26

Abstract

For months, Bitcoin experienced predictable "10 AM dumps" at the New York open, but this pattern recently broke as BTC surged over 4% instead. Traders linked the change to Jane Street, especially after its X account went blank and a lawsuit emerged. The Terraform Labs estate alleges a former intern turned Jane Street employee shared sensitive information, and a Jane Street-linked wallet sold $85 million in UST minutes after Terraform withdrew funds, potentially contributing to Terra's $40 billion collapse. Jane Street denies the allegations. Analysts caution that one rally doesn’t confirm a bull market; sustained momentum above $74,000 is needed. The case shifts focus from market failure to who may have profited from the crash.

For months, crypto traders had grown used to the so-called “10 A.M. dump,” where Bitcoin [BTC] would face heavy selling right at the New York open.

Gains would vanish within minutes, and many began to see it as a predictable pattern.

But this week, the pattern broke. Instead of falling at 10 A.M., Bitcoin surged more than 4%, climbing past $68,000 and triggering a short squeeze. The sudden absence of selling quickly became a major talking point.

Attention turned to Jane Street, especially after traders noticed that Jane Street’s X account appeared blank, sparking talk of a possible social media purge.

The growing speculation around Jane Street

While some say the firm rarely posted anyway, the timing, alongside the disappearance of the “10 A.M. dump,” added to speculation.

In an email sent to AMBCrypto, Nic Puckrin, co-founder of Coin Bureau and lead market analyst, said,

“We’ve seen one bounce in crypto prices and suddenly Crypto Twitter is convinced the bull market is back. This is a dangerous assumption.”

Puckrin added,

“The reality of Bitcoin market dynamics is much more nuanced. Regardless of whether market manipulation has taken place, Bitcoin’s price isn’t driven by just one firm, no matter how influential. It isn’t a memecoin.”

He further highlighted that at the macro level, geopolitical tensions, tighter global liquidity, and AI-driven volatility in the tech sector, long correlated with Bitcoin, are enough to explain the current crypto bear market.

Whether Bitcoin has already formed a bottom can only be confirmed by data. One strong up day is not enough.

A true recovery would require sustained momentum, a reclaim of the $74,000 level, and steady gains over several weeks. Until then, everything else is just noise.

The Terraform lawsuit

But the lawsuit filed by the estate of Terraform Labs has intensified scrutiny.

It alleges that a former Terraform intern who later joined Jane Street maintained a private chat group where sensitive information may have been shared.

The complaint claims that on 7th of May, 2022, Terraform withdrew 150 million UST from Curve’s 3pool.

Within 10 minutes, a Jane Street-linked wallet sold $85 million in UST, an action the lawsuit argues helped trigger the $40 billion Terra collapse.

Though Jane Street has denied the allegations, calling them baseless, the detailed claims have unsettled the industry.

At the same time, the social activity around Jane Street has significantly increased. The rise is largely linked to its $120 million stake in MicroStrategy.

While this looks bullish, analysts say large market makers often trade delta-neutral, using positions like MicroStrategy and ETFs such as BlackRock

In fact, the suspicion has also spread beyond Jane Street. Binance recently dealt with rumors of a “10/10” crash after claims about a liquidation event circulated on X.

However, in the end, the “10 A.M. dump” remains a compelling but unproven theory.

What’s more?

Terra and FTX became symbols of retail losses. The case against Jane Street, however, frames the situation differently.

Instead of being another victim of the crash, the firm is accused of positioning itself to profit from it.

These are still allegations, and Jane Street has denied wrongdoing, but the narrative has shifted from simple market failure to questions about who may have benefited most from the collapse.


Final Summary

  • Allegations tied to Terraform Labs suggest the 2022 collapse may involve more than flawed code and leverage, but the claims are still unproven.
  • One strong rally does not confirm a bull market. Sustained price action above $74,000 is needed to signal structural recovery.

Related Questions

QWhat was the '10 AM dump' phenomenon in the Bitcoin market, and why did it stop recently?

AThe '10 AM dump' was a pattern where Bitcoin faced heavy selling right at the New York open (10 AM), causing gains to vanish within minutes. It stopped recently as Bitcoin surged over 4% instead of falling, coinciding with speculation around Jane Street after its X account appeared blank and a lawsuit was filed against it.

QWhat allegations does the Terraform Labs lawsuit make against Jane Street?

AThe lawsuit alleges that a former Terraform intern who later joined Jane Street maintained a private chat group where sensitive information may have been shared. It claims that on May 7, 2022, a Jane Street-linked wallet sold $85 million in UST within 10 minutes after Terraform withdrew 150 million UST from Curve's 3pool, an action that helped trigger the $40 billion Terra collapse.

QAccording to Nic Puckrin, what factors explain the current crypto bear market beyond potential market manipulation?

ANic Puckrin highlighted that at the macro level, geopolitical tensions, tighter global liquidity, and AI-driven volatility in the tech sector (long correlated with Bitcoin) are enough to explain the current crypto bear market, emphasizing that Bitcoin's price isn't driven by just one firm.

QWhat does the article suggest is needed to confirm a true recovery in Bitcoin's price?

AA true recovery would require sustained momentum, a reclaim of the $74,000 level, and steady gains over several weeks. One strong up day is not enough to confirm a bull market or a bottom.

QHow does the case against Jane Street differ from the narratives around Terra and FTX collapses?

AWhile Terra and FTX became symbols of retail losses, the case against Jane Street frames the situation differently—instead of being a victim of the crash, the firm is accused of positioning itself to profit from it, shifting the narrative from market failure to questions about who benefited most from the collapse.

Related Reads

Don't Just Focus on Iran, the US Private Credit Crisis is Step by Step Repeating the 'Subprime Crisis'

Amidst geopolitical tensions, a private credit crisis is rapidly unfolding within the US financial system, drawing parallels to the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis. Major asset managers are facing significant stress: BlackRock restricted redemptions from its $26 billion HPS Corporate Lending Fund (HLEND), capping repurchases at 5% despite 9.3% redemption requests to avoid forced asset sales. Similarly, Blackstone’s $82 billion private credit fund (BCRED) saw a record 7.9% in redemption demands, prompting internal capital injections to avoid gating. Blue Owl Capital, whose stock fell below its $10 SPAC IPO price, sold $1.4 billion in loans to manage redemptions, exacerbating liquidity fears. PIMCO issued a stark warning, predicting a "full default cycle" for direct lending due to relaxed underwriting standards, overexposure to the software sector (vulnerable to AI disruption), and insufficient liquidity compensation for investors. The crisis highlights structural vulnerabilities: semi-liquid funds offering quarterly redemptions are backed by long-duration private loans, creating a mismatch. Redemptions force asset sales, driving down valuations and triggering further withdrawals—a vicious cycle reminiscent of 2008. With the private credit market valued at $1.8 trillion, systemic risks from opacity, concentration, and liquidity mismatches are now under severe strain.

比推10m ago

Don't Just Focus on Iran, the US Private Credit Crisis is Step by Step Repeating the 'Subprime Crisis'

比推10m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片