Injective的‘供应紧缩’提案以99%的赞成票通过——INJ接下来会怎样?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Injective(INJ)以99.89%的高票通过了一项名为“供应挤压”的激进通缩提案,旨在通过结构性代币经济升级大幅减少代币供应。根据提案IIP-617,INJ的总供应削减率将提高100%,具体措施包括将年度通胀率(目前为5%-10%)减半,并增加社区回购力度。此前该链已通过回购计划销毁超过680万枚INJ。 尽管提案通过后INJ短暂上涨4%,但因比特币受特朗普对欧关税政策影响跌至9万美元,INJ价格回落至12月低点约4.4美元附近。期货市场需求指标(Cumulative Volume Delta)持续走低,未平仓合约量也未明显变化,显示市场整体疲软态势暂时掩盖了该利好。未来价格能否因通缩政策提振仍有待观察。

Injective将推进其激进的通缩计划。该区块链在声明中表示,这项被称为"供应紧缩"的提案获得一致通过,赞成票比例高达99.89%。

该Layer 1链补充道

"INJ的新篇章现已开启,将大幅减少代币供应,使INJ逐渐成为最具通缩性的资产之一。"

该提案于1月16日首次提出,旨在为INJ代币社区回购计划提供补充性固定解决方案。

根据IIP-617号提案,INJ的总供应量减少率将翻倍。换言之,作为"INJ代币经济学的结构性升级"的一部分,供应减少量将增加100%。

需要说明的是,Injective [INJ]初始发行总量为1亿枚代币,是Injective生态系统的治理代币。

Injective作为质押奖励分配的年通胀率或排放量是动态的,根据85%的质押比率在5%到10%之间波动。

过去,该链的通缩计划涉及使用收集的费用推动代币回购。通过回购计划,已有超过680万枚INJ代币从供应中移除。

但新计划将更进一步:通过将排放量减半并增加回购来收紧供应。

通缩计划会改善INJ的前景吗?

然而,对于Hyperliquid [HYPE]、Pump.fun和Jupiter [JUP]等不同链上的回购计划,其结果和看法褒贬不一。

有些人将其称为"代币价值增值",而像Jupiter这样的其他项目则认为,如果代币价格不上涨,回购就是浪费资源

INJ的双管齐下方法能否消除Jupiter的疑虑尚不清楚。

与此同时,INJ更倾向于跟随整体市场情绪,而非这一利好消息。

消息公布后INJ上涨了4%,但随着美国总统特朗普对欧洲加征关税后比特币[BTC]跌至9万美元,截至撰稿时INJ已回吐部分涨幅。

在跌破5美元后,INJ一度跌至12月低点4.4美元附近,如果压力持续,可能会重新测试支撑位或跌至4.42美元。

此外,期货市场的整体需求仍然低迷。

过去一周,期货CVD(累计成交量delta)即期货市场对INJ的需求,从1月15日起越来越负面,尽管有"供应紧缩"的更新,但仍进一步下跌。

事实上,尽管有利好的代币经济学更新,未平仓合约(OI)仍保持在2500万美元附近不变。

综上所述,这些数据集表明,整体市场情绪掩盖了INJ的积极发展。价格后续是否会跟上还有待观察。


最终观点

  • Injective批准了一项计划,将其当前5%-10%的动态年排放量减半。
  • 尽管利好消息公布后出现了4%的小幅反弹,但投机兴趣和需求仍然低迷。

Related Questions

QInjective的‘供应紧缩’提案获得了多少比例的投票支持?

AInjective的‘供应紧缩’提案获得了99.89%的投票支持,几乎全票通过。

QIIP-617提案的核心内容是什么?

AIIP-617提案的核心内容是将INJ代币的总供应量减少率提高一倍,即增加100%的供应减少,作为对INJ代币经济学的结构性升级。

QINJ代币的初始总供应量是多少?

AINJ代币的初始总供应量是100,000,000枚。

Q新的通缩计划对INJ的排放和回购有何影响?

A新的通缩计划将使排放量减少一半,并增加回购力度,以进一步收紧供应。

Q尽管有利好的代币经济学更新,INJ的市场反应如何?

A尽管有利好的代币经济学更新,但INJ的价格在短暂上涨4%后部分回吐涨幅,期货市场需求指标(如Cumulative Volume Delta)持续为负,未平仓合约也未见显著变化,显示整体市场情绪仍然低迷, overshadowed 这一积极发展。

Related Reads

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbit1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片