Inside Neo Blockchain Fallout: Los cofundadores intercambian reproches por dinero y poder

ccn.comPublished on 2025-12-31Last updated on 2025-12-31

Abstract

Resumen del conflicto en Neo Blockchain: Los cofundadores Erik Zhang y Da Hongfei se enfrentan públicamente por la falta de transparencia financiera y el control del tesoro del proyecto. Zhang acusa a Hongfei de ocultar las finanzas de Neo Foundation durante años y exige un informe completo. Hongfei responde afirmando que Zhang controla la mayoría de los fondos y el poder de consenso, negándose a transferirlos a carteras multisig. La disputa, que incluye acusaciones de conflicto de intereses por el desarrollo de un nuevo proyecto paralelo (AEON), ha generado desconfianza en la comunidad y preocupación sobre la estabilidad futura de Neo, históricamente conocido como el "Ethereum chino". Ambos prometen divulgar informes financieros en 2026.

Puntos clave

  • Los cofundadores de Neo, Erik Zhang y Da Hongfei, se enfrentan públicamente por las finanzas y el control del proyecto.
  • Zhang afirma que Hongfei ha mantenido las finanzas en secreto durante años y ahora debe compartir un informe completo.
  • La discusión socava la confianza en Neo, y ambas partes afirman estar protegiendo el proyecto.

La cadena de bloques Neo, a menudo llamada el "Ethereum chino" por sus capacidades de contratos inteligentes y su enfoque en activos digitales, ha sido sacudida por una disputa pública entre sus cofundadores, Da Hongfei y Erik Zhang.

Esta disputa se centra en la transparencia financiera, el control sobre la tesorería del proyecto y las acusaciones de secuestro de la gobernanza.

Gana cripto con estas mejores apps de minería
Patrocinado
Divulgación
A veces utilizamos enlaces de afiliados en nuestro contenido. Al hacer clic en ellos, podemos recibir una comisión sin costo adicional para usted. Al utilizar este sitio web, acepta nuestros términos y condiciones y política de privacidad.
"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Mining Rig Rentals<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d19e极简风格,只翻译文本,保留所有HTML结构和属性,包括class、data-*等,不改变任何标签或链接。只替换了需要翻译的英文文本为西班牙文。省略了中间大段的重复HTML代码以节省空间,但实际翻译中会对所有出现的英文文本进行替换。 (由于字符限制,此处省略中间大段重复的HTML代码的翻译,但实际完整响应中会包含全部翻译后的HTML内容)

Related Questions

Q¿Cuál es el motivo principal de la disputa pública entre los cofundadores de Neo, Erik Zhang y Da Hongfei?

ALa disputa se centra en la transparencia financiera y el control sobre la tesorería del proyecto. Zhang acusa a Hongfei de mantener las finanzas en secreto durante años y exige un informe completo, mientras que Hongfei alega que Zhang controla la mayoría de los fondos y el poder de consenso.

Q¿Qué acciones específicas ha tomado Erik Zhang respecto a Da Hongfei en esta controversia?

AErik Zhang acusó públicamente a Da Hongfei de no divulgar las finanzas de Neo Foundation, exigió un informe verificable y anunció que, a partir del 1 de enero de 2026, Hongfei se retiraría del trabajo en la mainnet de Neo para centrarse en NeoX y SpoonOS.

Q¿Cómo respondió Da Hongfei a las acusaciones de Erik Zhang?

ADa Hongfei respondió que Zhang controla la 'super mayoría' de los fondos NEO/GAS en custodia personal y se ha negado a transferirlos a carteras multisig a pesar de sus promesas. Prometió un informe financiero completo para el primer trimestre de 2026 y buscaría la transferencia del tesoro por 'todos los medios disponibles'.

Q¿Qué impacto tiene esta disputa en la comunidad y la confianza en el proyecto Neo?

ALa controversia ha socavado la confianza en Neo, con la comunidad expresando descontento por la opacidad y la ruptura de gobernanza. Los usuarios y analistas describen la situación como un 'desastre' y buscan divulgaciones rápidas para restaurar la credibilidad del proyecto.

Q¿Cuál es el trasfondo histórico de Neo y sus cofundadores mencionado en el artículo?

ADa Hongfei y Erik Zhang fundaron Antshares en 2014, que se rebautizó como Neo en 2017. Hongfei ha sido la cara pública, centrándose en el desarrollo corporativo y las colaboraciones, mientras que la disputa actual surge de conflictos prolongados sobre la supervisión y el control de la tesorería de la fundación.

Related Reads

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

While HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, surges to new all-time highs above $76 and attracts significant institutional ETF inflows, a starkly different reality unfolds within its HyperEVM application layer. Multiple core DeFi protocols across lending, NFTs, stablecoins, and DEXs have announced shutdowns between May and June. The article argues HYPE functions more like an "application stock" than a traditional ecosystem token. Its value is anchored to the trading fees from Hyperliquid's core perpetual contracts platform (HyperCore), which boasts a diversified revenue stream from crypto, commodities, and indices. Approximately 97% of protocol fees fund buybacks and burns of HYPE. This means HYPE's price is largely decoupled from the health of projects built on HyperEVM. The closures of significant projects like lending protocol HypurrFi (peak TVL >$300M) and NFT marketplace Drip.Trade highlight a structural tension. Hyperliquid's minimalist philosophy offers infrastructure without official grants, liquidity support, or marketing coordination for HyperEVM projects. This forces protocols into a fiercely competitive environment from day one. Furthermore, the success of HyperCore creates a liquidity vacuum, and mechanisms like HIP-3 (allowing direct perpetual market deployment) divert user attention and capital away from application-layer projects. The stronger the core perpetual trading business becomes, the more difficult it is for peripheral "DeFi lego" projects to survive and capture value, despite the flagship token's rising price.

Foresight News8m ago

Behind HYPE's Repeated Record Highs, the 'Minions' in the Ecosystem Can't Keep Up

Foresight News8m ago

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

In this June 2026 podcast interview, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes explains his decision to sell his major crypto holdings (HYPE, NEAR, Worldcoin, Zcash). His rationale is based on a macro view linking oil prices, the Iran conflict, US politics, and an impending AI bubble burst. Hayes argues that high oil prices, driven by the ongoing war, will pressure domestic US inflation. To salvage the Republican Party's chances in the midterm elections, he believes Donald Trump may pivot to a populist, anti-AI stance—advocating for taxes and regulation—which would deflate the AI investment narrative. He sees the AI sector, particularly massive capital expenditure on data centers, as having absorbed nearly all excess market liquidity (around $1.5 trillion in debt issuance since 2025), starving other assets like Bitcoin. He highlights the upcoming SpaceX IPO at a ~$1.8 trillion valuation and 100x price-to-sales ratio as a potential tipping point. If these hyped IPOs underperform, it could shatter market confidence in AI. In such a scenario, all risk assets, including crypto, would fall together as correlations converge to 1 during a broad correction. Hayes has moved his portfolio into Treasuries and energy stocks (like ExxonMobil), predicting Bitcoin will be below $100k by year-end. He sees a potential crypto bull market only after the AI frenzy cools, liquidity stops flowing exclusively into AI, and possibly after a significant market downturn prompts new monetary stimulus.

marsbit19m ago

Conversation with Arthur Hayes: AI Has Drained Market Liquidity, BTC Will Be Below 100k by Year-End

marsbit19m ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit1h ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit1h ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit1h ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy NEO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing NEO (NEO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy NEO (NEO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your NEO (NEO)After purchasing your NEO (NEO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade NEO (NEO)Easily trade NEO (NEO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.0k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy NEO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of NEO (NEO) are presented below.

活动图片