Romance Crypto Scams on the Rise: Accounted for $185M in Losses for Americans

CryptoPotato2022-07-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-07-11 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

US residents have parted with over $1b due to crypto scams between January 2021 and March 2022 as romance frauds accounted for $185m.

According to an analysis conducted by Bankless Times, cryptocurrencies have grabbed the attention of a significant chunk of America’s population. However, scammers have used this growing popularity to con people in various methods. Romance scams are among the most employed technique since US citizens have parted with $185 million due to such schemes between January 2021 and March 2022.
‘The Heart Is Not so Smart’
Fraudulent schemes involving digital assets have emerged as a concern in numerous countries across the globe. A recent Federal Trade Commission (FTC) report estimated that such scams had affected 46,000 Americans between January 2021 and March 2022, while those victims parted with over $1 billion worth of crypto.
Bankless Times further observed that $185 million was lost due to romance schemes. Criminals often target lonely individuals by pretending they are interested in love affairs with them. They develop intimate online contacts with their victims and create trust before stealing some of their funds. Jonathan Merry – Bankless Times CEO – explained in detail how the scheme works:
“Victims of romance scams learn that the heart is not so smart the hard way. Their search for love makes them easy pickings for conniving individuals that dupe them out of their money. They put on an elaborate con that has their victims swooning over them, and by the time the victim catches on, they’ll be several thousand dollars poor.”
Bankless Times estimated that younger people are more inclined to be conned by such scammers. According to statistics, most victims are 20 to 40 years old, while individuals in their thirties suffer the most (35% of all losses).
Earlier this year, CryptoPotato reported the story of a British man who lost $200,000 worth of bitcoin in a romance scam. The man started chatting with a woman called Jia from Hong Kong. The latter introduced herself as a successful cryptocurrency investor with “inside knowledge.” Once gaining his trust, she urged him to invest some of his savings into a dubious app, assuring that the profits would be great.
The British distributed around $200,000 when he found out that his balance “had been cleared.” The man admitted that right after he realized the scam, he wanted to commit suicide. Fortunately, his mother was there for him, and thanks to her support, he is still alive.
What Other Scams Do Americans Fall Victim to?
The aforementioned report revealed that Investment Related Fraud remains the top scam involving digital assets. Here, criminals portray victims in a picture where their investment in particular projects could lead to huge profits in a short period of time. They even allow “test withdrawals” so that people could think the scheme is legit and riskless.
Needless to say, when the real “investment” begins, victims are unable to withdraw their funds and lose everything they have allocated. Due to such schemes, US residents have lost nearly $600 million between early 2021 and March 2022.
Business Imposters and Government Imposters are also common as they have accounted for over $130 million of the total losses.

İlgili Okumalar

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

The Fate of Digital Banks: A Flashy App is No Match for a Banking License The article argues that despite attracting billions of users with fee-free checking accounts and sleek apps, most "neobanks" struggle to be profitable because their core business—transaction fees—is inherently low-margin. The real profit engine of banking is lending (credit), which generates interest income. However, many early neobanks operated without their own banking licenses, which restricted their ability to lend at scale. Examples like Nubank, Revolut, and Chime illustrate the point. While they gained users with free accounts, their eventual profitability came from rolling out credit products. The piece highlights systemic risks for neobanks that rely on third-party infrastructure, citing the Synapse bankruptcy, which froze user funds and revealed the fragility of such models. The solution, according to the author, is obtaining a formal banking license, like the U.S. OCC's national trust charter. This provides regulatory backing, allows direct custody of funds, and eliminates dependency on intermediary partners. The trend is now evident in the crypto sector, where companies like Kraken, SoFi, and others are actively pursuing such licenses. The article concludes that while technology changes, the fundamental business logic of banking—profiting from lending—remains constant. Successful digital banks ultimately conform to this old model, just with better interfaces and fairer terms.

Foresight News5 dk önce

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

Foresight News5 dk önce

In the Name of Charity, For the Benefit of the Family: How the Trump Family Turns Philanthropy into Profit?

Charity for Profit: How the Trump Family Turned Philanthropy into Personal Gain Amid a recent controversy over misleading claims about his cryptocurrency company American Bitcoin, Eric Trump invoked his children's cancer charity as evidence of his good intentions. While his Curetivity foundation (formerly the Eric Trump Foundation) has donated over $25 million to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, an investigation reveals a pattern of self-dealing and opaque practices that benefited the Trump family business. Internal documents show that from 2011 to 2016, over $500,000 from the charity was funneled back to Trump-owned properties for event costs, transactions often omitted from tax filings. This created clear conflicts of interest, with figures like former club manager and current White House aide Dan Scavino involved on both sides. Public claims of "one of the lowest expense ratios" were contradicted by records showing significant spending on entertainment, auctions, and transportation. Facing scrutiny in 2017, Eric Trump distanced himself from the board and rebranded the foundation. After a state investigation shifted focus to compliance rather than enforcement, he returned as the public face. Fundraising events, now less transparent, continue at Trump venues. Estimates suggest these events have directed over $1 million to the Trump Organization over two decades. The same playbook of optimistic claims and obscured financial realities is now evident in Eric Trump's role at American Bitcoin. He promoted it as a highly profitable venture with low mining costs, but reports indicate most Bitcoin was purchased with funds from constant stock issuance, not mined, with actual costs far higher than claimed. While the company's stock has crashed nearly 90% from its peak, Eric Trump's personal stake remains valuable. The recurring pattern involves aggressive public defense, legal maneuvering to bury records, making minimal changes to satisfy regulators, and eventually repackaging the venture to regain trust, often successfully.

marsbit14 dk önce

In the Name of Charity, For the Benefit of the Family: How the Trump Family Turns Philanthropy into Profit?

marsbit14 dk önce

Bernstein Report: Agentic AI Will Transform CPU from Supporting Role to Leading Role, Bullish on Hygon Information

Bernstein research report: Agentic AI will turn CPUs from supporting players to leading roles, bullish on Hygon Information. Analysts led by David Dai argue that AI is transitioning from the chatbot era to the agentic AI era. Unlike simple query-response models, agentic AI involves complex workflows including retrieval, planning, tool calling, and multi-step reasoning. This shift dramatically increases the demand for CPU compute to orchestrate these tasks, manage memory, and prevent expensive GPU idling. The report forecasts that the GPU-to-CPU ratio in inference clusters will reverse from 8:1 in 2025 to 1:1 by 2029. In agentic AI workloads, CPUs could account for 50% of the compute, on par with GPUs. Consequently, the server CPU Total Addressable Market (TAM) is projected to surge from $37 billion in 2025 to $223 billion by 2030, representing a 6x expansion. Arm is identified as a key beneficiary due to its superior performance-per-watt and a strategic shift from IP licensing to designing its own chips, targeting $15 billion in chip revenue by 2030. Bernstein raises Arm's price target to $500. For x86 vendors, the report is Overweight on AMD (target $600) and Hygon Information (target CNY 450), citing leadership and strong growth in the Chinese market respectively. Intel's target is raised to $100, reflecting upgraded earnings assumptions. The analysis acknowledges significant supply-side risks, questioning whether foundry and memory capacity can support such rapid CPU growth. The optimistic demand forecast also heavily relies on Nvidia's guidance for over $1 trillion in annual AI infrastructure spend by 2027.

marsbit22 dk önce

Bernstein Report: Agentic AI Will Transform CPU from Supporting Role to Leading Role, Bullish on Hygon Information

marsbit22 dk önce

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Can Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: Standard Chartered Bank predicts UNI token will reach $100 by 2030, based on the growth of tokenized assets fueling demand for open DeFi liquidity and Uniswap's potential to capture fees from that trading. However, institutional tokenized products like BlackRock's BUIDL fund show that strict access controls and permissioned systems remain major barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 price target for Uniswap's (UNI) governance token by 2030 projects massive growth from current levels. The bank's thesis hinges on tokenized real-world assets (RWA) reaching trillions in value and a significant portion flowing into open, decentralized markets for trading and liquidity, rather than remaining in closed, permissioned systems. Uniswap's position as a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) infrastructure could allow it to capture a major share of this future trading activity. A key challenge is whether tokenized assets like bonds, funds, and stocks will trade openly on DEXs or be restricted to controlled, institutional platforms. The case of BlackRock's BUIDL fund exemplifies this tension: while it uses Uniswap's technology for settlements, trading is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This hybrid model provides DeFi efficiency but maintains traditional access barriers. For UNI to achieve such a high valuation, Uniswap must not only see increased trading volume from tokenized assets but also implement effective value-capture mechanisms for token holders. Recent governance proposals aim to direct protocol fees to UNI stakers, creating a clearer link between platform usage and token value. Ultimately, the realization of Standard Chartered's prediction depends on the future structure of the tokenized asset market. If open liquidity pools and reduced restrictions prevail, Uniswap's role could expand far beyond crypto-native trading. If permissioned, walled-garden systems dominate, its growth from institutional tokenization may be limited. The prediction itself signals growing institutional recognition of DeFi's potential role in the future of finance.

marsbit30 dk önce

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Can Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

marsbit30 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片