Stablecoin USDX crashes 63% as founder faces liquidity drain allegations

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-11-06Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-11-06

Key Takeaways

What caused the USDX crash?

On-chain investigators linked USDX founder Flex Yang’s wallet to addresses that drained USDC, USD1, and USDT liquidity using USDX as collateral.

How did lending protocols respond?

Lista DAO passed emergency proposal LIP022 with overwhelming support, triggering liquidation proceedings that are now nearly complete.


USDX collapsed today, dropping from $1 to $0.37 in a dramatic 63% crash. Traders accused Stables Labs founder Flex Yang of draining liquidity from major DeFi protocols, sparking panic across the market.

USDX stablecoin depegUSDX stablecoin depeg

Source: CoinGecko

The stablecoin hit bottom around 4:15 PM GMT on 6 November. It briefly touched $0.37 before climbing back to $0.70, according to CoinGecko data. The token should trade at $1.

USDX founder accused of foul play

The trouble started early on 5 November. A crypto analyst on X posted findings that linked Flex Yang’s, the founder’s, wallet to addresses draining USDC, USD1, and USDT liquidity. 

The wallets used sUSDX and USDX as collateral across three protocols: Euler, Lista, and Silo.

“Someone drained all USDC / USD1 / USDT liquidity using sUSDX / USDX as collateral,” Arabe Bluechip wrote. “They’re paying 100% borrow interest with no intent to repay.”

The analyst questioned the strategy. Why borrow against USDX while burning 100% interest? Why not just redeem for USDT?

Protocol responds

Lista DAO confirmed the crisis at 9:23 AM GMT on 6 November. The lending protocol said it had been monitoring MEV Capital’s USDT Vault and Re7 Labs’ USD1 Vault. 

Lister DAO response to USDX stablecoin depegLister DAO response to USDX stablecoin depeg

Source: X

Both vaults showed collateral facing “abnormally high borrowing rates without repayment activity.”

Lista pushed MEV Capital and Re7 Labs to act. “Take immediate responsibility,” the protocol demanded. “Finalize decisions, communicate transparently, and work with us to protect users.”

Emergency action

Lista DAO called an emergency vote. The community passed proposal LIP022 with overwhelming support. The protocol moved fast to liquidate positions and protect users.

Lista later confirmed that liquidation was “nearly complete.” Re7 Labs cooperated, taking “proactive steps in users’ best interest.” The protocol cut the USDX/USD1 market interest rate to 3%. Any remaining positions were moved to a public liquidation pool.

What it means

Trading volume for USDX exploded during the crisis. The token swung wildly throughout the day. This depeg ranks among 2025’s worst stablecoin failures. It raises serious questions about collateral management in DeFi. 

According to a report from Rise, there have been over nine stablecoins depeg events in 2025. However, they were resolved within hours; the deviation was over 1%. 

Stables Labs has stayed silent. The company hasn’t addressed the allegations or explained the depeg. 

The DeFi community awaits answers regarding the liquidity drainage and recovery plans for affected users.

The situation continues to develop.

Share

Letture associate

Trump-Backed Company World Liberty Financial Partners with Chinese AI Company of Limited Access to Provide Artificial Intelligence Services

According to a Reuters report, Trump-backed cryptocurrency company World Liberty Financial is linked to WorldClaw, a Hong Kong-based platform providing access to Chinese AI models that the U.S. government has flagged as security threats. WorldClaw's platform features AI models from Chinese companies like Alibaba, Baidu, Z.ai, DeepSeek, and Moonshot, some of which are designated by U.S. entities as tied to the Chinese military or subject to export restrictions. The connection is facilitated by World Liberty's dollar-pegged stablecoin, $USD1, which is accepted for payment on WorldClaw. The Trump family benefits from interest generated by the stablecoin's reserves, and token sales have earned them over $1.4 billion. A World Liberty executive previously advised WorldClaw on integrating $USD1. Security experts warn that using these Chinese AI models could expose users to surveillance or malicious code. WorldClaw claims over 10,000 users and processes 50 million queries daily, partly due to the lower cost of Chinese models. Both companies and the White House deny any conflict of interest, stating the platform helps American AI firms access international markets and that listing models does not imply endorsement. External critics, however, argue it is hypocritical to profit from Chinese AI tools while the U.S. government aims to counter the rise of Chinese AI.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trump-Backed Company World Liberty Financial Partners with Chinese AI Company of Limited Access to Provide Artificial Intelligence Services

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Moscow's Mining Ban Takes Effect: What Will Be the Consequences?

Mining has been banned in Moscow, the Moscow region, and parts of the Kursk region from August 15, with the prohibition set to last until December 31, 2032. The measure, requested by regional authorities, aims to prevent electricity shortages caused by energy-intensive mining equipment. This follows the legalization of cryptocurrency mining in Russia in November 2024, with restrictions now in place across 16 regions. Initially a blanket ban, an exception was introduced in March 2025 for miners using their own power generation, such as gas piston units or diesel generators, independent of the national grid. Major industry players had already begun shifting to on-site gas generation near gas fields to bypass grid limitations. While a trend emerged in 2025 to combine mining with AI computing infrastructure, this was complicated by authorities granting data centers (with a ban on mining inside them) preferential status as communication facilities. Experts state the new Moscow-area ban will significantly reshape Russia's mining geography but have a minimal global impact on Bitcoin's hash rate. The primary consequence will be a stronger industry shift to regions with energy surpluses, clear connection terms, and willingness to handle such loads. Moscow was already a contentious location due to high competition for power from data centers, industry, and urban infrastructure. For the Kursk region, the ban is also linked to infrastructure stability in border areas. The ban accelerates a market split. Large, legal operators will relocate equipment or seek sites with self-generation, while smaller or semi-legal miners operating in urban or industrial networks face higher costs and potential displacement into illegality. Industry participants note that post-2024 legalization had an unintended effect, with some major companies closing due to financial issues. Russian miners also face global pressures like low Bitcoin prices relative to mining costs, rising electricity prices, and the approaching 2028 halving, forcing some to shut down equipment.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Moscow's Mining Ban Takes Effect: What Will Be the Consequences?

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片