Bitcoin: Long-term holders dump, retail loads up – Who wins in BTC’s next move?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-21Last updated on 2025-10-22

Key Takeaways

What does BCMI at 0.5 mean for Bitcoin?

It shows the market cooling mid-cycle, not collapsing—suggesting valuation equilibrium before the next expansion leg.

Are traders preparing for a rebound?

Yes. Retail added $435 million BTC as whales sold 28K BTC, hinting at faith in recovery momentum near $111K resistance.


Bitcoin [BTC] has failed to close above the $111,000 threshold since the 15th of October, as prices continued to oscillate below that level.

Market data indicated that a potential recovery was still in sight. However, deep selling pressure from long-term holders could weigh on any rebound.

Bitcoin primed for a rally?

The Bitcoin Combined Market Index (BCMI) from CryptoQuant showed that while Bitcoin’s price weakened, its structural setup remained intact.

For the uninitated, the BCMI aggregates Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV), Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL), and Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR) to capture valuation, profit-taking, and sentiment.

At press time, the BCMI reading stood at 0.5, indicating that Bitcoin was in a neutral zone, also known as the mid-cycle equilibrium.

Bitcoin Combine Market Index (BCMI)

Source: CryptoQuant

Historically, a retest of this range (0.45–0.5) has preceded major expansions, where prices climbed as on-chain conditions reset.

That pattern suggests Bitcoin may be in a cooling phase before momentum rebuilds, potentially setting the stage for another push toward the $111,000 level.

However, long-term holders appeared to be resisting that recovery trend.

Long-term holders continue selling

Glassnode data confirmed that long-term holders have been distributing BTC steadily. Since the 15th of October, when Bitcoin last closed above $111,000, this cohort’s Total Supply dropped by around 28,000 BTC.

longterm total Bitcoin supply.

Source: Glassnode

Moreover, data showed a notable spike in selling activity. Average daily sales by long-term holders have increased from 12,500 BTC in July to 22,500 BTC per day in October.

This growing distribution trend, paired with weaker conviction among profit-holders, increased the pressure on short-term sentiment.

CryptoQuant data showed that Unrealized Losses totaled about $6.95 billion, signaling that several traders may still exit positions before a stronger rebound.

Even so, retail accumulation has begun to offset some of that distribution.

Retail investors counterbalance

CoinGlass data showed retail traders have been net buyers since the 20th of October, purchasing roughly $435 million worth of BTC within 48 hours—their largest inflow since the 10th of October.

Bitcoin spot exchange netflow

Source: CoinGlass

At press time, this group acquired an additional $20 million worth of Bitcoin, highlighting their confidence in the asset.

Sustained accumulation at this level could help counter bearish pressure from long-term holders and support Bitcoin’s momentum toward a new rally.

Share

Related Reads

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbit3h ago

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbit3h ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit4h ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片