大暴跌中,谁人“刀口舔血”狂赚上亿?哪些暴富机会近在眼前?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2025-10-13Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-13

原创 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth

继 312、519 之后,1011 注定会是被写在加密货币历史上一个日子。

昨日晚间,受特朗普突然的关税发言影响,全球金融市场暴跌,加密货币市场同样遭受重挫 —— BTC 一度跌至 101500 USDT,ETH 一度跌至 3373.67 USDT,SOL 一度跌至 144.82 USDT,BNB 一度跌至 860 USDT。

更为夸张的还是其他更小市值的山寨币,或受市场连环清算影响,多个山寨币短线跌幅超过 80% 甚至 90%。本人亲历过 312、519,但记忆中也未曾见过山寨币集体出现如此夸张的单日跌幅。

Odaily 注:清晨时的币安跌幅榜截图,这甚至还不是最低点的跌幅情况。

Coinglass 数据显示,截至今晨 7:40 左右,过去 24 小时全网爆仓总金额为 191.33 亿美元,爆仓人数多达 1,618,240 人。最大单笔爆仓为 Hyperliquid 平台某价值 2.03 亿美元的 ETH 多单。

极端行情之下,虽然绝大多数用户的仓位均遭受重创(比如麻吉一夜之间遭遇多次清算),但也有人“火中取栗”,捕捉到了极端行情下的暴富机会。

暴富机会一:直接做空

最简单的暴富机会自然是直接做空,这点不需细展开。

简单举个例子,Hypurrsan 数据显示,0x2ea18 开头的巨鲸地址过去 24 小时通过做空 BTC 和 ETH 盈利 7233 万美元,该巨鲸已将 6000 万美元 USDC 提回 Arbitrum,落袋为安。

暴富机会二:低位抄底

相对于合约玩家,现货用户最大的机会自然是低位抄底 —— 如果你昨夜在低位有挂单或是一夜未眠,你将有机会买到:

1.25 美元的 XRP;

0.095 美元的 DOGE;

0.55 美元的 SUI;

1 美元的 IP;

0.25 美元的 XPL;

0.1 美元的 ARB;

79 美元的 AAVE;

1.65 美元的 PENDLE;

0.05 美元的 JUP;

0.13 美元的 ENA;

2 美元的 UNI;

1.5 美元的 TRUMP;

0.001 美元的 ATOM(是的你没看错!);

0.00000 美元的 IOTX(是的你还是没看错!直接上图 ↓ )……

除了小市值山寨之外,ETH、SOL 等主流币种虽然看似跌幅不大,但也出现了绝佳的抄底机会 —— 受流动性限制影响,部分流动性衍生代币的价格出现了极大波动,其中 WBETH 一度跌至 430 美元,BNSOL 一度跌至 34.9 美元 —— 昨晚睡前谁敢想能看到 400 的 ETH 和 30 的 SOL 呢……

行情相对修复后,许多 KOL 都开始在 X 明牌晒单盈利状况,比如 Vida(@Vida_BWE)直接披露一夜盈利大概在 800 万美元左右。

暴富机会三:稳定币脱锚

除去仍有一定不确定性的山寨外,USDe 的短线脱锚也是昨晚的一大抄底机会。

或受市场流动性影响(部分用户需要将 USDe 换回 USDT 补充保证金),USDe 昨晚一度出现脱锚,在恐慌及连环清算之下一度跌至 0.6268 美元,部分用户借此机会抄底,在锚定修复之后赚了个盆满钵满。

事后,Ethena 官方于 X 发文表示确认 USDe 安全无虞,甚至协议借极端行情还多赚了些钱 —— “由于市场动荡和大规模清算,USDe 的二级市场价格出现波动。我们可以确认 USDe 的铸造和兑换功能始终保持运行,没有出现停机,且 USDe 仍然保持超额抵押。受清算影响,市场的合约交易价格一直低于现货价格,并且持续低于现货价格。由于 Ethena 会持有现货并做空合约,这使得 USDe 意外产生了更多额外收益。因此受突发事件的影响,USDe 的超额抵押率将比昨天更高。”

无需焦虑,盈利的只是少数,错过的都是命运

对于错过了昨夜行情的人(包括本人)而言,眼睁睁看着上述机会溜走,可能多少有些羡慕或是焦虑,但事实情况是可能只有不到 1% 的用户能够借此暴富,99% 以上的用户一觉醒来只能直面账户上的亏损。

一夜之间,近 200 亿美元在合约市场灰飞烟灭,这是市场财富大转移的一夜,也是许多用户倾家荡产的一夜……在行情波动如此极端的当下,我们能做的只有降低风险,保住子弹 —— 毕竟只有留在桌上,才能玩到最后。

相关阅读

惊魂暴跌夜:单日爆仓史上最高191亿美元,财富疯狂流动

加密史上最大爆仓日背后的巨鲸刺刀战:空军酒足,提刀离席

Пов'язані матеріали

The World Cup is Approaching: Sports Entering the Era of 'Fragmented Finance'

With the approaching World Cup, sports are entering an era of "fragmented finance." This shift is exemplified by FIFA's new rule requiring debutant players to wear a special "World Cup debut patch." Post-tournament, these patches will be authenticated, cut, and embedded into collectible cards, potentially transforming into high-value assets. The global sports trading card market, valued at over $11.5 billion, represents a sophisticated alternative asset class with deep secondary markets and distinct bull/bear cycles. While football has a massive fanbase, its card market has historically lacked the liquidity and unified narrative of the NBA's system. The NBA's success stems from its centralized, star-driven storytelling—from draft nights to championships—which perfectly fuels financialization. The World Cup patch initiative is FIFA's attempt to create similar "financial raw material" for football. The NBA card market, evolving over 70 years, has matured into a financial ecosystem. After a 1990s crash due to overproduction, the industry rebounded by embracing scarcity: limited editions, autographs, game-worn memorabilia (patches), and serial numbering. Today, it features professional grading (e.g., PSA, BGS), auction platforms, live "break" streams, and dedicated marketplaces, mirroring aspects of cryptocurrency markets with their volatility, speculation, and community-driven trading. The core driver is narrative. A card's value is tied to a specific historic moment or player potential—like Stephen Curry's 1/1 card commemorating his Olympic game-winning shot selling for $518,500. This trade in "ownership of history" or "future greatness" parallels prediction markets, both monetizing collective emotion. Unlike many NFT projects that struggle to generate sustained narratives, sports are a perpetual emotion-generating machine. Leagues like the NBA and UFC constantly produce real-world drama—rivalries, comebacks, and triumphs—that fuels ongoing interest and investment. For younger audiences consuming sports via highlights and social media clips, trading cards become a direct financial instrument for engaging with these narratives. Thus, traditional sports leagues are leading the charge in assetization, leveraging their unique advantages: real events, global fan consensus, and endless storytelling. They are becoming platforms for issuing financial assets, turning fragments of history—a patch, a signature, a moment—into tradable commodities.

Odaily星球日报19 хв тому

The World Cup is Approaching: Sports Entering the Era of 'Fragmented Finance'

Odaily星球日报19 хв тому

Vitalik's Latest Long Read: In the AI Era, How Can Code Become More Secure?

Vitalik Buterin explores the role of formal verification as a critical tool for software security, especially in the AI era and for blockchain systems. He defines formal verification as using machine-checkable mathematical proofs to verify that code meets specified properties, moving beyond manual auditing. The article highlights that while AI can generate code and find vulnerabilities rapidly, it also makes formal verification more accessible by assisting in writing proofs. This is crucial for Ethereum's complex components like STARKs, ZK-EVMs, consensus algorithms, and high-performance EVM implementations, where bugs can lead to irreversible losses. Vitalik argues that formal verification enables a powerful "separation of concerns": AI can write highly optimized (e.g., assembly) code for efficiency, while a separate, human-readable specification defines correctness. A machine-checked proof then verifies their equivalence. This paradigm can create a more secure "trusted core" of software. However, he cautions that formal verification is not a panacea. "Proven correctness" depends on the accuracy of the specifications and proofs themselves, which can be wrong or incomplete. Risks include unverified code sections, hardware-level side-channel attacks, and overlooked assumptions. The true goal is not absolute proof but increased confidence through redundant expressions of intent—using code, tests, types, and formal proofs—and automatically checking their consistency. The article concludes that AI and formal verification are complementary: AI enables scale, while verification ensures accuracy. For critical systems, this combination offers a path toward stronger security in a future with powerful AI adversaries, helping to maintain the defensive advantage essential for a decentralized internet.

marsbit1 год тому

Vitalik's Latest Long Read: In the AI Era, How Can Code Become More Secure?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片