В сентябре криптопроекты понесли потери более чем на $127 млн из-за атак хакеров

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2025-04-01Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-10-02

  • В сентябре 2025 года эксперты PeckShield зафиксировали около 20 крупных атак на криптопроекты.
  • Совокупный ущерб составил примерно $127 млн – на 22% меньше, чем в августе.
  • Больше всего пострадали UXLINK, SwissBorg, Venus, Yala и GriffAI.
  • Часть средств, похищенных из кошелька пользователя Venus, удалось вернуть.

В сентябре 2025 года криптоиндустрия потеряла около $127 млн в результате хакерских атак. Об этом сообщает аналитическая компания PeckShield.

#PeckShieldAlert September 2025 saw ~20 major crypto exploits, resulting in total losses of $127.06M.
This marks a -22% decrease from August's $163M.

In a positive development, ~$13M drained from a Venus user in a #phishing attack has been recovered.

Top 5 Hacks:
🔺 #UXLINK –… pic.twitter.com/ebUYM3Xwnh

— PeckShieldAlert (@PeckShieldAlert) October 2, 2025

Всего за месяц произошло не менее 20 крупных взломов. По сравнению с августом 2025 года, когда потери достигли $163 млн, сумма убытков снизилась на 22%.

Самой масштабной атакой стал инцидент с UXLINK — проект потерял более $44 млн. На втором месте SwissBorg с почти $41,5 млн убытков.

Третье место — пользователь децентрализованного протокола Venus, который из-за фишинговой атаки потерял $13,5 млн. Впрочем, согласно обновленным данным, злоумышленники согласились вернуть часть средств. Из $13,5 млн, похищенных у пользователя Venus, удалось восстановить $13 млн.

В список крупнейших атак месяца также вошли:

  • Yala — $7,64 млн;
  • GriffAI — $3 млн.

Напомним, ранее криптоисследователь ZachXBT заявил о возможном взломе SBI Crypto на $21 млн.

Letture associate

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

A hacker group called "CyberLeek" has leaked gameplay footage of the highly anticipated video game *GTA 6*, which is slated for release in 2026. Simultaneously, the group launched a meme token, $CYBERLEEK, on Solana. The leaks, which include maps and gameplay clips, are heavily watermarked with advertisements urging viewers to buy the token. Investigations of blockchain data reveal that the token was created and funded from a single wallet approximately eight hours before the first leak was released, suggesting a coordinated plan. The group has implemented a voting system where token holders can "vote" for the next type of content to be leaked by sending $CYBERLEEK tokens to a designated wallet—a process that permanently transfers the tokens to the hackers. This creates a self-sustaining cycle where interest in the leaks drives token purchases. Financially, the operation involved minimal upfront costs (less than $3,500 in out-of-pocket expenses) but generated significant revenue. On its first day, the token saw $15 million in trading volume, netting the creators an estimated $30,000 from transaction fees alone. While the group later burned a large portion of its developer-held tokens (worth over $1 million) to build trust, the fee-generating mechanism remains intact. The game's publisher, Take-Two Interactive, has initiated legal proceedings to identify the hackers. Despite this, the case demonstrates a new model where leaked intellectual property is used as leverage to promote and profit from a cryptocurrency, with meme token markets serving as an additional revenue stream.

marsbit3 h fa

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片