From Rally to Correction

insights.glassnodePublished on 2025-09-24Last updated on 2025-09-25

Excerpt

Bitcoin shows signs of exhaustion after the FOMC rally. Long-term holders have realized 3.4M BTC in profits, while ETF inflows slowed. With spot and futures under stress, the short-term holder cost basis at $111k is the key level to hold or risk deeper cooling.

Executive Summary

  • Bitcoin has entered a corrective phase after the FOMC-driven rally, showing signs of “buy the rumour, sell the news” dynamics. The broader market structure points toward fading momentum.
  • On-chain drawdown remains mild at 8%, but realized cap inflows of $678B and 3.4M BTC in long-term holder profits highlight the unprecedented scale of capital rotation and distribution.
  • ETF inflows, once a key absorber of supply, slowed sharply around the FOMC as long-term holder distribution accelerated, creating a fragile balance in flows.
  • Spot volumes spiked during the sell-off, futures markets saw heavy deleveraging, and liquidation clusters revealed vulnerability to liquidity-driven swings on both sides of the market.
  • Options markets repriced aggressively, with skew surging and puts in high demand, signalling defensive positioning. Combined with peak gamma conditions, the macro backdrop suggests a market increasingly exhausted.
💡
View all charts in this edition in The Week On-chain Dashboard.

From Rally to Correction

Following the FOMC-driven rally that peaked near $117k, Bitcoin has transitioned into a corrective phase, echoing a textbook “buy the rumour, sell the news” pattern. In this edition, we step back from short-term swings to assess the broader market structure, using long-term on-chain indicators, ETF demand, and derivatives positioning to evaluate whether this pullback reflects healthy consolidation or the early stages of deeper contraction.

On-Chain Analysis

Volatility in Context

Building on this, the current drawdown from the $124k ATH to $113.7k is just 8%, mild compared to the cycle’s 28% drawdown or the 60% declines of prior cycles. This aligns with the long-term trend of diminishing volatility, both across macro cycles and within intra-cycle phases, resembling the steady advance of 2015–2017, so far without its late-stage blow-off rally.

Live Chart

Cycle Duration

Extending the view, overlaying the last four cycles highlights how peak returns have diminished over time, even as the present trajectory remains closely aligned with the prior two cycles. Assuming $124k marked the global top, this cycle has lasted roughly 1,030 days, very close to the ~1,060-day lengths of the previous two cycles.

Live Chart

Capital Inflows Measured

Beyond price action, capital deployment provides a more robust lens.
Realized Cap, measuring the cumulative capital invested to absorb older supply at higher values, has risen in three waves since November 2022. Lifting the total to $1.06T, reflecting the scale of inflows underpinning this cycle.

Live Chart

Realized Cap Growth

To contextualize:

  • 2011–2015: $4.2B
  • 2015–2018: $85B
  • 2018–2022: $383B
  • 2022–Present: $678B

This cycle has already absorbed $678B in net inflows, nearly 1.8x larger than the prior cycle, underscoring its unprecedented magnitude in capital rotation.

Live Chart

Profit Realization Peaks

Another difference lies in the inflow structure. Unlike the single prolonged waves of earlier cycles, this cycle has seen three distinct multi-month surges. The Realized Profit/Loss Ratio shows that each time profit-taking exceeded 90% of coins moved, marking cyclical peaks. Having just stepped away from the third such extreme, probabilities favour a cooling phase ahead.

Live Chart

LTH Profit Dominance

The scale is even clearer when focusing on long-term holders. This measure tracks cumulative LTH profits from a new ATH to the cycle peak. Historically, their heavy distribution marks the tops. In this cycle, LTHs have realized 3.4M BTC, already surpassing previous cycles, highlighting both cohort maturity and the magnitude of capital rotation.

Live Chart

Off-Chain Analysis

ETF Demand vs LTHs

This cycle has also been shaped by the tug-of-war between long-term holders distributing supply and institutional demand via US spot ETFs and DATs. With ETFs a new structural force, price now reflects this push-pull: LTH profit-taking caps upside, while ETF inflows absorb distribution and sustain the cycle’s advance.

Live Chart

Fragile Balance

ETF inflows have so far balanced LTH selling, but with little margin for error. Around the FOMC, LTH distribution surged to 122k BTC/month, while ETF netflows (7D-SMA) collapsed from 2.6k BTC/day to nearly zero. The combination of rising sell pressure and fading institutional demand created a fragile backdrop, setting the stage for weakness.

Live Chart

Spot Market Stress

This fragility was visible in spot markets. During the post-FOMC sell-off, volumes spiked as forced liquidations and thin liquidity exaggerated the move lower. Aggressive sell flows overwhelmed order books, accelerating the decline. While painful, this absorption formed a temporary foundation just above the short-term holder cost basis near $111.8k.

Live Chart

Futures Deleveraging

At the same time, futures open interest fell sharply from $44.8B to $42.7B as Bitcoin broke below $113k. This deleveraging event flushed out leveraged longs, amplifying downside pressure. While destabilizing in the moment, the reset helped clear excess leverage and restore balance to derivatives markets.

Live Chart

Liquidation Clusters

Perpetual liquidation heatmaps add colour. As price broke $114k–$112k, dense clusters of leveraged longs were wiped out, driving heavy liquidations and accelerating downside. Risk pockets remain above $117k, leaving both sides of the market vulnerable to liquidity-driven swings. Without stronger demand, fragility around these levels increases the risk of further sharp moves.

Live Chart

Options Market

Volatility Response

Turning to the options market, implied volatility provides a clear lens on how traders navigated a turbulent week. Two major catalysts shaped the landscape: the first rate cut of the year and the largest liquidation event since 2021. Volatility climbed into the FOMC as hedging demand built, only to fade quickly once the cut was confirmed, signaling the move was largely priced in. However, the sharp Sunday night futures liquidation reignited demand for protection, with one-week IV leading the rebound and strength extending across maturities.

Live Chart

Skew Repricing

After the FOMC, BTC skew briefly approached equilibrium, with downside puts carrying little premium over calls. That calm quickly faded. On Friday, 1W skew spiked from ~1.5% to 17%, a sharp repricing that also lifted longer expiries.

While skew is often more reactive than predictive, in this case it revealed aggressive demand for puts — either as protection against a sharp drawdown or as a way to monetize volatility. Just two days later, the market delivered on that signal with the largest liquidation event since 2021.

Live Chart

Put/Call Flows

Following the sell-off, the put/call volume ratio has trended lower as traders locked in profits on in-the-money puts and others rotated into cheaper calls. Skew reinforces this picture: short- and mid-dated options remain heavily tilted toward puts, leaving downside protection expensive relative to upside. For participants with a constructive view into year-end, this imbalance creates opportunities — either by accumulating calls at relatively low cost or financing them through selling richly priced downside exposure.

Live Chart

Gamma Overhang

Total options open interest is hovering near all-time highs and will unwind sharply at Friday morning’s expiry, before rebuilding into December. For now, the market sits in a peak gamma zone, where even small price swings force aggressive dealer hedging. Dealers are positioned short gamma on the downside and long gamma on the upside, a structure that amplifies sell-offs while capping rallies. This dynamic skews near-term volatility risk to the downside, reinforcing fragility until expiry clears and positioning resets.

Live Chart

Conclusion

Bitcoin’s retreat following the FOMC reflects a textbook “buy the rumour, sell the news” pattern, but the broader backdrop points to growing exhaustion. On-chain, the current 8% drawdown is modest compared to past cycles, yet comes after three major waves of capital inflows that lifted realized cap by $678B, almost double the prior cycle. Long-term holders have already realized 3.4M BTC in profits, underscoring the heavy distribution and maturity of the rally.

At the same time, ETF inflows that previously absorbed supply have slowed, creating a fragile balance. Spot volumes spiked on forced selling, futures saw sharp deleveraging, and options markets priced in downside risk as skew surged. Together, these signals suggest a market running out of fuel, with liquidity-driven swings dominating.

Unless demand from institutions and holders aligns again, the risk of deeper cooling remains high, highlighting a macro structure that increasingly resembles exhaustion.


Disclaimer: This report does not provide any investment advice. All data is provided for informational and educational purposes only. No investment decision shall be based on the information provided here, and you are solely responsible for your own investment decisions.

Exchange balances presented are derived from Glassnode’s comprehensive database of address labels, which are amassed through both officially published exchange information and proprietary clustering algorithms. While we strive to ensure the utmost accuracy in representing exchange balances, it is important to note that these figures might not always encapsulate the entirety of an exchange’s reserves, particularly when exchanges refrain from disclosing their official addresses. We urge users to exercise caution and discretion when utilizing these metrics. Glassnode shall not be held responsible for any discrepancies or potential inaccuracies. 

Please read our Transparency Notice when using exchange data.



Related Reads

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

The core of recent semiconductor stock volatility is not about daily price swings, but rather the market questioning whether AI-driven semiconductor pricing has entered a new phase. Following a sharp sell-off in Korean stocks on June 23rd, led by Samsung and SK Hynix, a subsequent rebound is seen more as a technical positioning adjustment rather than a confirmed trend reversal. The key variable is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), essential for AI chips. Its supply-demand imbalance granted memory makers significant pricing power. The current market focus is on whether this dynamic remains strong enough to justify elevated valuations. All eyes are on Micron's upcoming earnings report. The critical factor is not whether results meet already high expectations, but whether the company's guidance confirms that AI memory pricing power, order visibility, and future margins are still expanding. Micron's outlook will serve as a crucial test for the broader AI semiconductor chain, including Samsung, SK Hynix, and other infrastructure players. The recent bounce appears to be a pre-earnings positioning repair. For it to evolve into a sustained uptrend, concrete evidence is needed that the AI infrastructure expansion cycle's fundamentals—particularly for high-end memory—remain robust and can continue to surpass elevated market expectations. The risk is that strong demand alone may not be sufficient if future guidance hints at peaking momentum or increasing supply-side pressures.

marsbit25m ago

Semiconductor Stock Rebound: Is the Technical Correction Over or a Trend Reversal?

marsbit25m ago

Global Tech Stocks Plunge: Another Stress Test for the AI Bull Market

Global tech stocks plummeted in a sharp selloff on June 23, with South Korea's KOSPI index crashing nearly 10%, triggering a trading halt. The plunge was led by semiconductor giants Samsung and SK Hynix, dragging down major Asian and US tech indexes and levered ETFs. The immediate trigger was a confluence of three signals within 24 hours: 1) reports that SK Hynix was slowing HBM4 expansion, raising doubts about a key AI chip bottleneck; 2) profit-taking ahead of Micron's earnings report after its massive year-to-date rally; and 3) a warning from Korean regulators about the risks of single-stock leveraged ETFs. The selloff's severity was amplified by Korea's uniquely leveraged market structure: record-high retail margin debt, over $30 billion in volatile single-stock leveraged ETFs requiring daily rebalancing (which creates selling pressure during declines), and the surprising shift of the National Pension Service from a net buyer to a net seller. The event reignited debates about an AI bubble. Analysts differed on timing—some warned of imminent rupture, others saw a temporary liquidity-driven correction—but agreed that sky-high valuations, a shift to retail/leveraged buying, and rising rates created a fragile setup. The parallel steep drop in SpaceX's stock, alongside its massive debt raise for AI infrastructure, underscored a broader market shift from narrative-driven "infinite imagination" to a "return on investment" calculation phase. All eyes are now on Micron's upcoming earnings report, seen as a key test for the AI hardware trade's fundamental logic. A strong report could stabilize markets, while a miss could validate deeper fears. The episode serves as a stark warning: when a bull run becomes dependent on leveraged bets on a single narrative, a violent and rapid correction should not be a surprise. The core question for investors is how much drawdown they are willing to tolerate to stay invested.

marsbit27m ago

Global Tech Stocks Plunge: Another Stress Test for the AI Bull Market

marsbit27m ago

Ethereum Foundation Cuts 20% of Staff, 54 Depart: The Survival Logic Behind the Restructuring

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major restructuring, resulting in the departure of 54 staff members, representing approximately 20% of its workforce. This reorganization is not merely a cost-cutting measure but a strategic refocusing. The EF will now concentrate its resources on what it deems critical and unique tasks, structured around five new operational clusters. The new structure comprises clusters dedicated to: the Protocol Layer (ensuring Ethereum's core properties like censorship resistance and security); the Access Layer (enabling trusted, non-intermediated user interactions); the User Layer (grounding decisions in real user needs and constraints); the Community Layer (representing EF's stance and building alliances); and the Institutional Layer (engaging with enterprises, governments, and academia to promote principled adoption). The foundation stated that the layoffs were a difficult but necessary step to align its organization and spending with its long-term mandate, insulating its core work from short-term market fluctuations. Affected employees were offered a severance package and transition support. The restructured EF emerges as a leaner and more focused organization, poised to prioritize the development and preservation of Ethereum's foundational promise of self-sovereignty. Further details on the new operational model are expected in the coming weeks.

marsbit29m ago

Ethereum Foundation Cuts 20% of Staff, 54 Depart: The Survival Logic Behind the Restructuring

marsbit29m ago

Talking About Returns But Not Collection? Goldfinch's Liquidation Sounds the Alarm for RWA Credit

Goldfinch, a crypto lending platform connecting investors with real-world borrowers, has proposed a full wind-down via governance proposal GIP-87. The plan would halt all new development, shut down its flagship Goldfinch Prime product, and allocate 150,000 USDC to manage the collection of outstanding loans. While the proposal is under community vote, it highlights a critical shift for the RWA (Real World Asset) lending sector: the transition from a growth phase focused on yields to a difficult recovery phase focused on collections. The proposal reveals that while the protocol's on-chain TVL is low, it still holds tens of millions in active, non-performing loans off-chain. This gap underscores that tokenizing debt makes tracking exposure transparent but does not simplify the offline, labor-intensive, and legally complex process of loan recovery. The case of the Lend East pool, where only an estimated 42% of a $10.15 million loan may be recovered, exemplifies the potential for significant investor losses. The wind-down plan forces token holders to govern not expansion but the maintenance of a debt collection system, including funding legal trust structures and preserving user access for repayments. This move starkly contrasts with the sector's typical narrative of rapid, AI-powered underwriting and high yields, exposing the often-overlooked necessity for robust borrower vetting, standardized disclosure, and sustainable collection mechanisms. Ultimately, Goldfinch's situation serves as a crucial stress test for the entire RWA lending space. It demonstrates that a platform's true resilience is tested not during capital deployment but during the protracted, costly, and uncertain process of recovering defaulted loans from real-world borrowers, a challenge blockchain transparency alone cannot solve.

Foresight News34m ago

Talking About Returns But Not Collection? Goldfinch's Liquidation Sounds the Alarm for RWA Credit

Foresight News34m ago

Meta Launches Prediction Market, Code-Named "Arena": Not Using Real Money, 3.56 Billion Daily Active Users Are Its Biggest Bargaining Chip

Meta, under the codename "Arena," is developing a standalone prediction market application, according to a June 23 report by The New York Times. Initially, the app will operate on a points-based system rather than real-money betting, though future integration of financial transactions is not ruled out. Meta plans to leverage its vast ecosystem of apps, boasting 3.56 billion daily active users, to distribute the product. The strategy aims to lower user acquisition costs and navigate regulatory complexities associated with real-money prediction markets, which are overseen by bodies like the CFTC. News of Meta's entry caused stock dips for established players like DraftKings and Robinhood, reflecting market concerns over Meta's potential to disrupt incumbents like Polymarket and Kalshi with its massive scale. The prediction market sector has seen explosive growth, with monthly trading volume on major platforms surging to approximately $24 billion as of April 2026. This marks Meta's second foray into the space, having launched and later shut down a similar virtual-points app called Forecast in 2020. While Arena poses a competitive threat to crypto-based platforms like Polymarket, its mainstream reach could also significantly expand the overall user base and awareness for prediction markets. The project remains in development with no public launch timeline, but its announcement has already impacted market sentiment.

marsbit40m ago

Meta Launches Prediction Market, Code-Named "Arena": Not Using Real Money, 3.56 Billion Daily Active Users Are Its Biggest Bargaining Chip

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片