GSR Files for ETFs to Track Crypto Treasury Companies

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-09-25Last updated on 2025-09-25

Crypto trading and market-making firm GSR is planning to launch its first exchange-traded fund (ETF) focused on companies that hold digital assets.

According to a regulatory filing, the proposed GSR Digital Asset Treasury Companies ETF “will not invest directly in digital assets such as Bitcoin, Ether, or other cryptocurrencies.” Instead, it would invest in public companies that own cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ether, in their corporate treasuries.

GSR expects the ETF to hold around 10–15 positions, covering 5–10 companies, including firms investing in altcoins. Examples of companies that could be included are major players like Strategy Inc. (MSTR), CEA Industries (BNC), and Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR), along with other firms.

As per the filing, GSR plans to allocate at least 80% of its assets to publicly traded companies. It also read, “any company that generally maintains a significant portion of its assets in one or more digital assets.”

Other planned crypto ETFs

In addition to this treasury-focused ETF, GSR is planning four other crypto ETFs: Core3 ETF, Ethereum Staking Opportunity ETF, Crypto StakingMax ETF, and Ethereum YieldEdge ETF. These funds focus on staking and related strategies. Some will have offshore subsidiaries that will stake Ethereum or invest in other staking-related products.

Ethereum Staking and YieldEdge ETFs

GSR intends to organize the Ethereum Staking and YieldEdge ETFs via offshore wholly-owned subsidiaries so they can purchase and stake Ethereum while being governed by U.S. laws under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

The Ethereum Staking fund will predominantly invest in Ether staking ETFs offshore, and the YieldEdge ETF will utilize an actively managed derivatives strategy. The StakingMax ETF will invest in cryptocurrencies and securities relating to proof-of-stake networks, utilizing an offshore subsidiary.

Ethereum Staking Opportunity and Crypto Core3 ETFs

The GSR Ethereum Staking Opportunity ETF aims to track the movement of Ethereum (ETH) plus staking rewards. Investors in this fund would be charged a yearly management fee of around 1%, and other charges would be minimal.

The Crypto Core3 ETF is intended to follow Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana, and could directly hold the tokens. It is listed under the Securities Act of 1933 and intends to invest about one-third of its assets in each token to provide exposure to the three leading digital assets.

The launch comes as a result of a rising trend among asset managers providing ETFs tracking cryptocurrencies and staking strategies.

Also Read: SEC Clears Grayscale’s ETH ETFs Under New Generic Rules

Follow The Crypto Times on Google News to Stay Updated!

U.S. Stocks Trend (June 24): Korean Stock Plunge Ripples Global Chip Sector, Micron Tumbles Over 10%, Long-Term Supply Certainty Faces a 'Hard Test'

US Stock Market Trend (June 24): South Korean Market Plunge Disrupts Global Chips, Micron Drops Over 10%, Long-Term Supply Certainty Faces Hard Test On Monday, the South Korean KOSPI index plunged 10%, with SK Hynix and Samsung dropping over 12%, triggered by rumors that SK Hynix might slow its HBM4 production expansion. This shock quickly spread to the U.S. semiconductor sector. Micron plummeted 13.18% to $1,051.77, SanDisk fell 13.64%, and Marvell declined 8%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index closed down 7.87%, while the Nasdaq fell 2.21% to 25,587.04 points. The sell-off particularly hit memory chip stocks. Defensive sectors showed relative resilience, with gains in stocks like IBM and Johnson & Johnson. Market volatility spiked, with the VIX index jumping 12.79%. Commodities weakened, with WTI crude oil hitting a near three-month low and gold falling below $4,100. The core issue is not a challenge to AI demand itself, but a market reassessment of overly optimistic capacity expectations for memory chips, especially HBM. The rumor about SK Hynix undermined perceived certainty in the AI infrastructure cycle. Key upcoming events include Thursday's PCE inflation data, which will influence Fed rate expectations, and Micron's earnings report. The market will focus on Micron's HBM gross margins and its long-term capacity guidance. The shift indicates the AI investment cycle is moving from euphoria to rational pricing. Large institutions are questioning the sustainability of AI-related capital expenditure growth. Micron's repricing from an "AI infrastructure staple" to a more cyclical stock highlights this change. Thursday's data and earnings represent a critical juncture for assessing long-term supply certainty, which has now significantly decreased.

marsbit5m ago

U.S. Stocks Trend (June 24): Korean Stock Plunge Ripples Global Chip Sector, Micron Tumbles Over 10%, Long-Term Supply Certainty Faces a 'Hard Test'

marsbit5m ago

In the AI Era, What Kind of KOLs and Communities Will Not Be Completely Replaced?

In an interview with investor BitWu, the discussion centers on surviving and thriving in Web3 during AI's rise. Key points include: Crypto is shifting from retail speculation to financial infrastructure, with stablecoins, RWA, and AI as critical future trends. AI could transform Crypto into a financial rail for AI agents, enabling 24/7 programmable transactions. For Web3 gaming, past failures stemmed from prioritizing "play-to-earn" over fun; future success requires engaging AI, social features, and UGC. Regarding KOLs, those merely repackaging information may be replaced by AI, but authentic voices with experience, judgment, and trust will endure. Communities must evolve beyond airdrop chasing to build genuine trust, shared goals, and real-world connections. Newcomers should prioritize risk management over quick profits, learning from cycles rather than mistaking bull-market luck for skill. The overarching theme: long-term thinking, real utility, and human-centric value will define what survives in the AI era.

marsbit28m ago

In the AI Era, What Kind of KOLs and Communities Will Not Be Completely Replaced?

marsbit28m ago

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

Preferred Shares Are Not the Catalyst for Corporate Bankruptcy; MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027. This article analyzes the nature of preferred shares used by MicroStrategy (MSTR). Legally equity but economically similar to debt, these shares, including its Bitcoin-linked STR convertible preferred notes (STRC), offer fixed or floating dividends. Crucially, MicroStrategy's preferred shares lack rigid redemption clauses, meaning they are not classified as traditional debt. This eliminates principal repayment pressure and means missed dividends do not constitute default or trigger bankruptcy, creating a "self-contradictory virtuous cycle." The article clarifies that if funds are short, MicroStrategy can defer or suspend preferred share dividends (except for non-cumulative types like STRD) without immediate risk. The real potential crisis point lies with its convertible bonds. If a prolonged bear market prevents conversion, MicroStrategy might need to sell Bitcoin to repay these bonds starting from the earliest maturity in September 2027, potentially creating a downward spiral. Preferred dividend suspensions would only exacerbate market panic in such a scenario. Recent financial activity shows MicroStrategy strengthened its position through four weeks of common stock (MSTR) issuances, raising over $851 million without issuing new preferred shares. It increased its dollar reserves to approximately $1.4 billion, which is sufficient to cover all preferred share dividends and interest until around March 2027. While Bitcoin purchases slowed recently, this prioritization of cash reserves enhances the company's near-term financial safety. The analysis concludes that if the Bitcoin bear market ends by early 2025 as anticipated, MicroStrategy can resume issuing MSTR stock in a rising market to replenish reserves and manage future dividend obligations, thereby reducing the long-term pressure from its preferred share structure.

marsbit1h ago

Preferred Stock Is Not the Trigger for Corporate Bankruptcy, MicroStrategy's Dollar Reserves Can Cover Dividend and Interest Payments Until February 2027

marsbit1h ago

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbit2h ago

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbit2h ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手9h ago