一文盘点Pump.fun直播板块最新热门项目

深潮Published on 2025-09-14Last updated on 2025-09-15

Pump.fun 再次成为市场焦点，直播板块突然爆火。

撰文：Asher，Odaily 星球日报

 

Pump.fun 再次成为市场焦点。这一次，不仅因为其代币 PUMP 登上韩国交易所 Upbit、过去一周涨幅近 60%（Odaily星球日报将于另一篇文章中深度解析 Pump.fun 自身基本面变化），更因为其直播板块的突然爆火。据 GMGN 数据统计，Pump.fun 直播“毕业”板块中，市值突破 100 万美元的代币已达 39 个。

下面，Odaily星球日报为大家盘点近日 Pump.fun 直播板块的热门项目。

Odaily 提醒用户，Meme 币价格波动较大，投资者请注意风险。

Bagwork

项目介绍：Bagwork，意为“为你的袋子而战”，灵感源自拳击/健身领域的“bagwork”，象征着为自己的加密资产拼搏。项目将日常健身和拳击精神与加密交易结合，鼓励持有者成为真正的“bagworker”。上线仅数日，Bagwork 就因一系列大胆举动迅速走红。

在首日，开发者冲进洛杉矶道奇体育场并直播被捕，引发第一波关注；次日，他们在健身网红 Bradley Martyn 的 ZOO Culture 健身房偷帽子，被当场扇耳光，相关视频在 X 和 TikTok 上病毒式传播，推动代币价格暴涨，市值从 13 万美元飙升至 278 万美元，创作者单日获得 4.9 万美元费用。第三天，团队又飞往拉斯维加斯，直播 Canelo 对战 Crawford 的拳击赛。与此同时，他们拒绝 Twitch 挖角，坚持使用 Pump.fun 平台直播，并带动社区扩展到全球，例如英国团队直播“突袭麦当劳”，进一步放大声量。

二级表现：Bagwork 代币仅上线 4 天，9 月 13 日晚起，市值从 250 万美元开始暴涨，今晨市值最高突破 5000 万美元，目前市值为 3500 万美元。

合约地址：7Pnqg1S6MYrL6AP1ZXcToTHfdBbTB77ze6Y33qBBpump

KIND

项目介绍：项目采用慈善驱动的叙事，将 100% 的创作者奖励捐赠给小主播，主打公益与爱心。据悉，该项目的 Dev 是知名的 Web2 创作者。

二级表现：KIND 代币于 9 月 7 日上线 9 月 13 日晚起，，市场从 200 万市值开始暴涨，今晨市值最高触及 4500 万美元，目前市值为 2700 万美元。

合约地址：V5cCiSixPLAiEDX2zZquT5VuLm4prr5t35PWmjNpump

STREAMER

项目介绍：STREAMER 项目将交易费用用于捐赠热门主播，以换取他们的推广，从而吸引新用户。这种方式与 Web 3 版“抖音打赏”相似——用户付费支持，主播即时互动，形成强烈的参与感。平台会展示 LIVE DATA 排行榜，让成千上万的观众实时看到谁在为自己喜欢的主播贡献最多，目前项目已打赏超过 200 名直播主。

二级表现：STREAMER 代币于 9 月 3 日创建，昨日市值最高触及 4000 万美元，目前市值为 1600 万美元。

合约地址：3arUrpH3nzaRJbbpVgY42dcqSq9A5BFgUxKozZ4npump

BUN COIN

项目介绍：BUN COIN 是英雄联盟前职业选手 @BunnyFuFuu 直播时在 Pump.fun 平台上发的代币， Bunny 是 Web 2 直播网红，本人 YouTube 粉丝超过 150 万，X 平台粉丝超 21 万。

二级表现：BUN COIN 代币于昨日创建，市值最高触及 1000 万美元，目前市值为 770 万美元。

合约地址：HQDTzNa4nQVetoG6aCbSLX9kcH7tSv2j2sTV67Etpump

CLIP

项目介绍：CLIP 是一个基于用户生成内容（UGC）的奖励生态系统，用户通过创建和分享视频剪辑（需标记项目 @clipcoinpump）来获得加密货币奖励，最高可达 10 SOL，将短视频文化的病毒式传播与加密支付相结合，利用代币激励驱动内容创作和流量增长，从而形成正向循环。

二级表现：BUN COIN 代币于昨日创建，市值最高突破 600 万美元，目前市值为 340 万美元。

合约地址：9LjLmk78kDbpsR18kYcdbEJe9yWALwkkSWaXA76Epump

Related Reads

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

**Tau Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine for the Post-Moore Era** For 60 years, progress in semiconductors was driven by Moore's Law – making transistors smaller, denser, and cheaper. This path has now stalled due to plummeting returns below 7nm, astronomical lithography costs, and rising per-transistor expenses. After six years and testing 381 production chips, Huawei’s semiconductor team proposes a fundamental shift: **stop competing on size, start competing on time**. This is the core of their "τ (Tau) Scaling" theory. It treats *time* as the key optimization metric, compressing characteristic delays (τ) across all levels – from transistor switching (picoseconds) to data center tasks (seconds), spanning 12 orders of magnitude. **What is τ Scaling?** It holistically minimizes delay/time constants (τ) across four layers: transistors (switching speed), circuits (signal delay), chips (compute/memory access), and systems (end-to-end communication). The goal is to align optimization from process and circuit design to architecture and systems using this unified metric. **Mobile Application: LogicFolding** Without advancing the process node, this technique vertically stacks chips using ultra-precision hybrid bonding, distributing critical paths across layers ("stacking floors"). Results include a 55% transistor density increase, 41% better energy efficiency, over 40% higher SRAM frequency, and a roadmap targeting 4GHz by 2029. **AI Data Center Application: Full-Link Latency Compression** With 80% of AI cluster energy and 70% cost spent on data movement, the focus is slashing communication time. Key innovations include: 1. **Unified Bus:** Cuts multi-layer protocols, reducing remote access latency from microseconds to ~100 nanoseconds – 500x faster. 2. **Hi-ONE Optical Interconnect:** Replaces copper with fiber, enabling 8Tb/s per module and scaling distances from 1m to 100m for 10,000-chip clusters. 3. **3D Folding:** Solves the "interface bottleneck" of 2.5D packaging by vertically integrating memory, power, and optical I/O alongside compute, predicting over 100x integration density gain by 2035. **Re-fusion of Logic and Memory** The AI era, where data movement is more critical than computation, demands tight 3D integration of logic and memory, shifting industry influence towards memory and advanced packaging. **Remaining Challenges** include adapting EDA tools for 3D design, optimizing wafer-to-wafer process variation and vertical interconnect losses, and establishing new energy efficiency and benchmarking standards. **Conclusion:** The era of scaling physical dimensions is over. The era of scaling time has begun. By leveraging 3D stacking, system architecture, and interconnect optimization—rather than solely chasing advanced lithography—performance and efficiency can continue to advance. This is poised to be the semiconductor industry's core roadmap for the next decade.

marsbit8m ago

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

marsbit8m ago

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

**Summary: The Fundamental Flaws of NodeStrategy, the 'First Ordinals DAT'** NodeStrategy presents itself as the first Ordinals Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) on Bitcoin. Its model mirrors MicroStrategy's treasury narrative but for NFTs, specifically targeting the NodeMonkes collection (not officially affiliated). The project's core mechanism is a four-step flywheel: a 10% fee on all trades (90% to treasury, 10% to radFi/Bound marketplace) is used to buy NodeMonkes. These NFTs are then listed for sale on Satflow, with 100% of the sale proceeds used to buy back and burn the project's token, NODESTRAT, aiming to create a perpetual value cycle. However, the design contains critical, self-defeating flaws: 1. **Platform Lock-In:** As a Bitcoin Rune, NODESTRAT lacks smart contract functionality and cannot natively enforce the 10% fee. The fee can only be collected on the radFi/Bound marketplace itself. This makes the entire flywheel dependent on a single platform. If liquidity moves elsewhere, fee revenue drops to zero, halting the mechanism. 2. **Self-Suffocating Economics:** The 10% fee acts both as the flywheel's fuel and a major drag on demand. A buy/sell roundtrip incurs a 20% cost, creating a massive hurdle for traders. This strangles the very trading volume needed to generate fees. 3. **Ineffective Value Support:** The flywheel is starved. Low daily volume (~$9K) generates minimal fees for NFT purchases. The NFT "ladder" sales are slow and unpredictable (only 39 total sold), meaning buybacks are infrequent. While 30.77% of the supply has been burned, this supply reduction cannot lift price without corresponding demand, which is suppressed by the high transaction tax. 4. **Meaningless NAV:** The Net Asset Value (NAV), currently at a 0.46x discount to market cap, is merely a marketing figure. There is no redemption mechanism for token holders to claim the underlying NodeMonkes assets. Price is set by market liquidity flows, not by this theoretical backing. In essence, NodeStrategy's design forces its revenue source (trading fees) to simultaneously cripple the demand and liquidity required for its own success, trapping the project in a stagnant state.

marsbit14m ago

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

marsbit14m ago

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

"Agentic Design Patterns" is a 2025 book by Antonio Gullí, a Google engineering director, which offers a systematic framework for AI Agent development through 21 design patterns. A core contribution is the "Four Levels of Agency": Level 0 (bare LLMs) are not true agents. Level 1 agents actively decide when and how to use tools. Level 2 agents engage in strategic planning, context engineering (curating and filtering information), and self-reflection. Level 3 involves multi-agent collaboration with defined communication topologies. The book introduces **Context Engineering** as a superset of prompt engineering, managing four layers of information for the agent: system prompts, external data, implicit context (user history, environment), and feedback loops for automated optimization. A key pattern is **Reflection (Producer-Critic)**, where two distinct agents with different prompts collaborate iteratively—one produces output, the other critiques it—until quality is satisfactory or a max iteration limit is reached. For **Memory**, a three-layer model is proposed: Session (ephemeral conversation context), State (temporary task data), and Memory (persistent, long-term storage). Regarding **Multi-Agent Systems**, the book advises against unnecessary complexity, recommending simple topologies like Supervisor or Peer-to-Peer based on task needs. It emphasizes perfecting a single Level 2 agent before moving to multi-agent setups. The author concludes with three actionable takeaways: 1) Add a Critic agent to existing workflows, 2) Practice Context Engineering beyond simple prompts, and 3) Avoid premature multi-agent complexity; first master a robust single agent. The book provides a practical map, codifying common challenges like reflection, memory, and coordination into reusable patterns, saving developers from reinventing foundational solutions.

链捕手1h ago

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

链捕手1h ago

Will ETH See Fund Inflows Again? Sharplink and BitMine Make It onto the Russell Index List

Two Ethereum (ETH)-related public companies, Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR), will be added to the U.S. Russell Indexes on June 29, 2026. SBET is confirmed for the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000, while BMNR is on the preliminary list for the Russell 3000 and has a high chance of entering the Russell 1000. This inclusion acts as an "automatic shopping list" for massive passive investment funds like ETFs and pension plans, compelling them to buy these stocks to match the index composition. Consequently, millions of mainstream investors who do not directly trade crypto will automatically gain exposure to these Ethereum-linked equities through their index funds. This move channels significant passive capital—trillions of dollars track these indexes—into SBET and BMNR, integrating Ethereum-related investment opportunities into traditional financial portfolios. While the funds buy the companies' stocks, not ETH directly, this is expected to provide short-term price support for the stocks and increase their liquidity and institutional ownership. Over the long term, it could also indirectly incentivize the companies to acquire more ETH.

marsbit1h ago

Will ETH See Fund Inflows Again? Sharplink and BitMine Make It onto the Russell Index List

marsbit1h ago

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

An AI agent autonomously analyzed SpaceX's 226MB S-1 filing, purchased real-time market data on-chain for $1.87, and generated a comprehensive investment memo in 12 minutes. The memo concludes a "Hold" recommendation. Bull Thesis: SpaceX holds a near-monopoly in commercial launch (80% of global orbital mass since 2023), operates the profitable Starlink business (10.3M subscribers, $7.2B adj. EBITDA), and is vertically integrated from rockets to AI via the xAI acquisition. Starlink alone is a standout, high-margin business. Bear Thesis: The AI division is a massive cash burn ($6.4B operating loss on $3.2B revenue in 2025). True debt obligations approach ~$42B, not the headline $29B, due to bridge loans and X-related debt. Significant contingent liabilities exist, including a potential $10B fee from a Cursor option agreement. The company faces concentrated counterparty risk (e.g., a $45B Anthropic contract), slowing revenue growth, and complex governance as a controlled company with four share classes. Valuation anchors Starlink's standalone value at ~$84B (applying Iridium's 7.4x sales multiple), suggesting the current ~$500B+ IPO target prices in immense future execution risk for Starship and AI. Key risks include Starship delays, accelerating AI losses, and underwriter conflicts (the IPO's lead banks are also lenders on the $20B bridge loan it aims to refinance). Investment triggers: upgrade to "Overweight" if priced ≤$350B and Starship meets milestones; downgrade to "Pass" if priced >$510B or key risks materialize.

marsbit1h ago

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy FUN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing FUNTOKEN (FUN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy FUNTOKEN (FUN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your FUNTOKEN (FUN)After purchasing your FUNTOKEN (FUN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade FUNTOKEN (FUN)Easily trade FUNTOKEN (FUN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.06.25Updated 2025.07.03

How to Buy FUN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of FUN (FUN) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow