从 4500 万到千亿利润:Hyperliquid 如何酝酿万亿市值神话?

比推Published on 2025-09-10Last updated on 2025-09-10

作者:Pima,ContinueCapital 联创

原文标题:从4500万到千亿利润,拆解Hyperliquid冲击万亿市值的底层逻辑


Crypto 领域最赚钱的业务,合约市场,目前一年全市场大概 200-300 亿美金的利润,这在过去 2 年中以大概年化 100% 的增速迅猛发展,反而现货市场被碾压,利润分配大概合约:现货=3:1

按照美股 25 倍 PE,我们可以大概知道合约市场能支撑 5000-7500 亿市值公司,假如币安一家拿走 40% 的市场份额,大概 2000-3000 亿市值,假如 Hyperliquid 拿走 30% 的市场,大概对应 1500-2200 亿市值;为什么币安得不到如此高 PE?我认为一方面是财务透明度问题,(安然造假对资本市场的冲击是灾难性的)另一方面是管道问题,需要触及更多的渠道让资本市场介入(DAT/ETF/Robinhood 等)第三就是收入多元化问题(订阅模式比抽佣模式享受更高的估值)随着时间的推移,上述阻力都在向好。

$HYPE 能用多久拿到 30% 市场份额?分析未来的前提是能认清当下,你未来的业绩靠现在以及过去的表现来动态预估。

2024 年 12 月 HYPE 月收入 4500 万,25 年 8 月月收入 1.1 亿美金,月营收复合增速 11.8%,按照这个增速,要实现单月收入 10 亿美金,大概还需要 19 个月,也就是年收入 120 亿美金,PE 25 对应 3000 亿公允市值;假设边际增速降低,( 体量增大 / 竞争加剧 ) 月营收增速 5%,从 0.45-10 亿总共需要 64 个月也就是目前还需要 55 个月,年化增速 80%,即实现 120 亿美金年化收入大概还需要 4.5 年。

在合规加持万物上链一切泛金融化的趋势下,合约市场整体依然保持高速增长,假设按照年化 30% 增速,5 年后的合约市场利润在 740-1110 亿美金,千亿利润是完全可以支撑 2 万亿的市值,你只要能拿到 30% 的市场份额,6000 亿市值是完全公允估值。要明白美股 MEGA 7,(除了 TSLA)不是靠 PE 推动,绝大部分是靠 EPS 推动,每个 2 万亿以上的公司的背后都是年利润千亿美金。

在此并没有预测 HYPE 上 的稳定币市场收入 / 现货市场收入 / 未来 HIP-3 带来的生态市场收入等等,只是盯着主要矛盾和最优解,(当然支付市场也是很庞大,需要单独另表)整体逻辑和思路搭建了个框架,有兴趣可以自行延展

透明的力量,无许可的力量是无穷的,与其哀叹为什么项目踯躅不前,不如好好研究公司如何在未来赚取更多的现金流。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手7h ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手7h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手7h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手7h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit7h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片