CoinW亮相Coinfest Asia 2025:锁定亚洲市场新机遇,打造未来金融入口

深潮Pubblicato 2025-08-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-25

CoinW正努力为用户提供优质体验,打造未来金融入口,推动全球数字经济的发展。

2025年8月21至22日,备受瞩目的Coinfest Asia 2025在印度尼西亚巴厘岛努阿努创意城圆满落幕。作为全球领先的加密货币资产交易平台,CoinW币赢以活动赞助商和重磅演讲嘉宾身份亮相,与来自90多个国家的超过10,000名参会者共同见证这场亚洲最大规模的区块链行业盛会,充分展现了其推动全球加密货币生态系统创新与合作的坚定承诺。

本次活动期间,CoinW首次线下集中展示其投资产品生态,涵盖PropW、GemW、DeriW、WConnect等产品。此次展示为参会者提供了了解CoinW产品矩阵及整体业务布局的机会,体现了其在多元化金融服务方面的探索。

值得特别关注的是,CoinW首席战略官(CSO)Nassar Ackchar作为重要嘉宾深度参与了大会期间的多场边会活动,就区块链技术发展趋势、数字资产投资策略以及全球加密货币市场监管等前沿话题发表了深刻见解。

独家洞察:CoinW首席战略官解读加密市场新趋势

本届Coinfest Asia以“满月”为主题,寓意Web3正迈向主流应用的全新阶段。这一理念也为CoinW展示创新思路与合作愿景提供了理想舞台。大会期间,CoinW与行业领袖及更广泛的区块链社区展开深入交流,分享前沿洞见。

CoinW首席战略官 Nassar Ackchar 受邀参加了备受瞩目的圆桌论坛 「涨势背后:推动资金流动的技术」,与多位行业专家探讨加密市场的发展趋势。

在由印尼加密网络合作伙伴关系负责人Stanley Suhadi主持的对话中,Nassar指出:

「我们正见证一场深刻的金融变革:新兴市场用户正在重新定义货币的使用方式,稳定币正在构建一个独立于传统银行体系的平行金融基础设施。从跨境汇款到日常储蓄,再到零售支付,这一趋势不仅体现在CoinW交易数据的持续增长中,更预示着全球金融普惠的新纪元。」

沉浸体验:CoinW全生态产品现场亮相

大会期间,CoinW举办的Connecting Legends特别边会成为一大亮点,吸引了众多与会者驻足体验。CoinW在现场搭建的互动展示区,全面呈现了其创新产品矩阵,氛围热烈,参与度极高。

整个边会围绕CoinW整合投资后构建的全场景数字资产交易生态主题展开,系统展示了涵盖从中心化高效交易到去中心化创新探索的完整价值链。

作为边会的开场重头戏,CoinW首席战略官Nassar发表了主题演讲。Nassar特别强调了CoinW"用户至上"的核心产品理念,并通过实际数据和用户反馈案例,深入阐述了CoinW主站、GemW、WConnect如何协同构建完整的交易生态闭环,为现场观众展示了CoinW投资的产品生态布局。

  • CoinW综合交易平台:覆盖全球 200+ 国家和地区,支持多种主流及长尾交易对。平台结合 AI 策略工具与多层风控,实现订单智能路由与撮合优化,使用户在中心化交易环境中获得高效、安全的交易体验。
  • GemW:整合链上潜力及长尾资产,用户无需独立配置钱包或持有 Gas 代币,只需输入合约地址即可完成交易。平台基于 LENS 模型结合链上数据、社交热度及项目解析,为用户提供资产筛选参考。
  • WConnect:WConnect是由CoinW发起的旗舰线上系列活动,通过连接全球建设者、开发者和交易平台,推动全球区块链生态的交流与创新。

PropW团队在会上围绕PropW进行了专题分享,介绍了这一全球首个专注于加密货币自营交易的平台及其核心理念。他阐述其在提升交易效率和优化资源配置上的探索。团队表示表示,PropW不仅是一个创新产品,更希望推动行业模式的转变。同时他们还分享了PropW的市场表现:目前平台已在全球50多个国家和地区服务约10万名交易用户,呈现出持续增长的趋势。

DeriW团队进行了产品战略分享,从市场角度深入阐述了DeriW作为公链基础设施的商业价值和发展前景。Tharaka介绍了DeriW基于Rollup架构实现80,000 TPS处理能力的市场优势,以及零Gas永续合约交易模式如何重新定义用户交易体验。团队重点分析了DeriW在去中心化金融领域的战略定位,详细展示了高收益LP流动性池如何吸引更多用户参与,构建可持续的生态经济模型。

Connecting Legends主题边会不仅展示了CoinW的技术实力与产品生态,更通过现场互动深化了与社区的连接。许多参会者表示,通过亲身体验更加直观地感受到了CoinW在构建用户友好型加密货币生态系统方面的努力和成果。

迈向未来:CoinW在亚洲的创新布局

CoinW在Coinfest Asia 2025上的积极参与,再次彰显了其通过教育推广、技术创新与产业合作推动加密行业发展的持续努力。此次深度亮相印尼,也进一步凸显了CoinW对亚洲市场的战略重视。

作为全球数字资产采用增长最快的地区之一,亚洲展现出巨大潜力与创新活力。印尼等国正积极探索数字经济政策,当地年轻群体对新兴金融科技的接受度极高。

CoinW看好该地区的长期发展前景,并将以此次大会为契机,进一步深化本地化布局,精准回应用户需求,提供更贴合亚洲市场的产品与技术支持。

CoinW首席战略官Nassar会后指出:“我们高度重视亚洲市场的发展机遇,专注于建立真正的共赢合作关系,以增强整个生态系统活力并推动集体增长。”

这一理念也贯穿于CoinW的全球战略——通过不断优化产品与服务,CoinW正努力为用户提供优质体验,打造未来金融入口,推动全球数字经济的发展。

关于CoinW

CoinW币赢成立于2017年,现已成为全球领先的加密资产交易平台,为全球多个国家和地区的数字货币用户提供一站式数字资产服务入口。平台提供一站式智能交易服务,日均交易额超50亿美元,CMC合约排名第4,注册用户突破千万。CoinW致力于「助力用户财富增值」和「赋能区块链科技变革」,并持续优化产品架构,推出多条独立运作的创新产品线。自2022年起,CoinW通过赞助国际体育赛事和与足球传奇球星Andrea Pirlo合作,持续扩展品牌影响力。同时,CoinW始终秉持社会责任感,积极投身于公益事业,捐赠物资支持非洲孤儿院,并在台湾发起流浪动物慈善活动。未来,CoinW将继续推动全球普惠金融,领航加密行业发展,推动区块链和加密资产的全球普及。

了解更多信息,可访问CoinW官网,或关注CoinW的X账号以及加入CoinW电报群

Letture associate

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit19 min fa

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbit19 min fa

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手29 min fa

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手29 min fa

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit54 min fa

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit54 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片