DeFi Groups, a16z Urge SEC to Create Blockchain Safe Harbor

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-08-03Last updated on 2025-08-13

The DeFi Education Fund and venture capital giant Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) are calling on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to create a regulatory safe harbor for certain blockchain-based applications. 

In a joint letter sent Wednesday to SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, the groups proposed a framework that would exempt qualifying decentralized finance (DeFi) apps from broker-dealer registration requirements.

The proposal comes as the SEC, under the Trump administration, signals a shift in its approach to digital asset regulation. Over the past year, the agency has launched a crypto task force aimed at setting a “sensible regulatory path,” dropped investigations into several crypto companies, and introduced “Project Crypto” to modernize rules around digital assets. President Donald Trump has publicly vowed to make the United States the “crypto capital.”

The letter from a16z and the DeFi Education Fund specifically cites prior enforcement actions that the groups argue misapplied securities laws to blockchain software. The SEC had alleged that Coinbase Wallet functioned as an unregistered broker, a claim later dismissed by a court. Uniswap Labs and OpenSea were also previously investigated, but those inquiries were dropped.

Under the proposed safe harbor, applications would be excluded from broker-dealer oversight if they are non-custodial, do not make recommendations or exercise discretion, and are built on decentralized protocols. 

According to the letter, most blockchain apps are “fundamentally non-custodial, passive software tools that allow users to interact directly with public, decentralized network and protocol infrastructure.”

Amanda Tuminelli, executive director of the DeFi Education Fund, explained that the safe harbor aims to be flexible while offering much-needed clarity for developers. She noted that the proposal is intended to give front-end developers clear guidelines, allowing them to build without the fear of being subjected to unreasonable requirements that don’t align with the realities of the technology.

Andreessen Horowitz has a history of advocating for clearer crypto regulations in the U.S., frequently pressing for securities laws to be kept off activities that do not present traditional market risks. The latest petition aligns with growing support for DeFi from both the White House and SEC leadership.

“The guiding principle of the safe harbor is that only those apps which do not engender the risks that the Exchange Act’s broker-dealer regulatory regime was designed to address should be eligible,” the proposal states, adding that in such cases, requiring registration as a broker would be “unwarranted and inappropriate.”

Also Read: SEC’s Atkins Eyes Policy Reforms After Ripple Case Ends



Related Reads

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit1h ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit1h ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit1h ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit1h ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手1h ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片