SignalPlus宏观分析:非农疲软引发连锁反应,市场走向新的拐点?

marsbitPubblicato 2025-08-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-05

涨多终将回调。在经历了一段「只涨不跌」的行情后,风险资产在全面低于预期的非农就业数据打击下走低。整体就业数据疲软(失业率由 4.117% 升至 4.248%),再次印证了就业市场放缓的趋势,此外,美国劳工统计局也发布了近年来(除疫情期间外)最大规模的两个月就业数据下修(-25.8 万)。

非农就业数据


雪上加霜的是,ISM 制造业就业指数跌至 2020 年第二季度以来的最低水平,而其他领先指标也预示著就业市场恐将进一步恶化。


非农就业数据


市场反应迅速且剧烈,美国股市收盘下跌 2% 至 3%,美元兑日圆下跌 2.2% 至 147,而对比前一日,利率市场定价所反映的年底前降息预期几乎增加了 25 个基点。


收益率变化特别显著,2 年期收益率当日崩跌近 30 个基点,是近五年来最大单日跌幅之一。上周结束时,市场对今年降息预期升至约 60 个基点,而前一天仅为 35 个基点左右,这促使 Trump 总统猛烈抨击美联储主席 Powell 未能及时降息,并批评美国劳工统计局公布「不准确」的就业数据。


非农就业数据


「我们需要准确的就业数据……现在的数据是 Biden 政府任命的人做的。」


「在我看来,现在的就业数据是被操纵过的,目的就是为了让共和党和我丢脸。」—Trump 总统


非农就业数据

上周五市场的剧烈反应也盖过了近期美联储偏鹰派的会议内容。会中 Powell 强调,美联储已在尽力透过维持利率不变以应对商品通胀。同时,随著美联储理事 Kugler 辞职,Trump 总统可能在短期内提名新的人选,对美联储的施压只会进一步升高。


非农就业数据


谈到政策影响,Trump 总统也再次延后实施新一轮关税,从原定的 8 月 1 日延后至 8 月 7 日,为本周的密集谈判铺路。谈判焦点将放在瑞士(关税高达 39%)、台湾、加拿大和巴西,同时市场也将持续关注俄乌局势升温,以及美国部署潜舰的后续发展。


尽管外界对关税谈判存在各种意见和嘲讽,但美国 7 月份收入确实达到创纪录的 1500 亿美元,前一个月也实现了 270 亿美元的盈余,大幅扭转了一年前 710 亿美元的赤字。此外,随著美国例外论叙事回归,市场对美国资产的需求自 5 月以来大幅反弹,任何资本外流的担忧都已烟消云散。


美元亦顺势反弹,美元指数从近期低点回升超过 3%,黄金等避险资产则开始转弱。


非农就业数据


非农就业数据


股市方面,财报季迄今表现不俗,Visa、Mastercard 和 Amex 均报告了支付量和消费动能的稳健增长,而银行的财报也大致符合预期。科技板块方面,消费者在商品和运输领域持续展现韧性,Meta 和 Microsoft 盈利表现出色,但最终被 Amazon 和 Coinbase 令人失望的财报所拖累。


非农就业数据


最后,在加密货币方面,Coinbase 营收年增 3.3% 至 15 亿美元,但未达分析师预期,且低于 2025 年第一季度的 20 亿美元。净利润受到加密货币和 Circle 持仓未实现收益的提振,不过全球和美国现货交易量在第二季度整体偏淡。


Coinbase 股价已自 7 月高点回落 25%,随著整体市场情绪走弱,BTC 价格也下跌至 11.2 万美元,上周五有超过 10 亿美元的多头期货遭到清算,是 5 月以来最惨烈的一次。


非农就业数据


不出所料,BTC 与 ETH 上周均出现显著资金流出,BTC 在周四/周五出现 10 亿美元的流出,为年内单日最差表现之一,而 ETH 也结束了近一个月的连续净流入,在上周五流出 1.52 亿美元。


非农就业数据


整体而言,鉴于资金外流的速度和规模,市场表现其实已较预期稳定,而这也与 BTC 与 Altcoins 的市场深度明显提升有关。随著机构资金与专业投资者加入,次级市场流动性已有改善,避免了 ETF 推出前那种剧烈抛售的情况。


非农就业数据


展望未来,市场目前处于一个微妙的关口,预期多空双方将陷入拉锯,短期内尚难分出胜负。多头阵营认为市场对非农就业数据过度反应,而空头则会指出,鉴于过去三个月的过热行情,这将是市场转向的初步信号。持续不断的关税消息与 Trump 日益激进的言论,势必进一步加剧市场杂讯,而随著夏季进入后段,整体交易活动减少,市场波动可能会被进一步放大。


我们预期短期内不会出现明确的方向性突破,本月价格走势也将较 7 月更为震荡。第四季度将十分关键,届时美联储会全面恢复运作,而关税与通胀的叠加效应也将开始对实体经济产生影响。在此背景下,我们认为现在是适度降低风险敞口的良机,以迎接忙碌的 9 月和年底。祝各位操作顺利,交易愉快!

Letture associate

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit14 min fa

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit14 min fa

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit54 min fa

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit54 min fa

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit1 h fa

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片