Ripple To Replace SWIFT? XRP Analyst Breaks Down Recent Developments

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-07-04Last updated on 2025-07-05

Abstract

The long-standing and controversial question of whether Ripple payments could one day replace the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The long-standing and controversial question of whether Ripple payments could one day replace the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is gaining renewed attention in the crypto market. A prominent XRP analyst has highlighted a significant shift in the Ripple payment infrastructure that could represent a potential turning point in the crypto company’s bid to challenge SWIFT’s decades-long dominance in global cross-border settlements

XRP Analyst Unveils Ripple’s Latest Moves

In his latest X social media thread, crypto market analyst Pumpius explains how Ripple could eventually supersede SWIFT as a cross-border payment infrastructure and settlement layer for banks. The analyst highlights recent developments that continue to fuel Ripple’s growth and position it as a prime candidate for transforming global financial messaging. 

According to Pumpius’s report, Ripple has taken a significant step forward in its bid to transform the global financial system, as recent developments show deepening infrastructure integration. The XRP analyst disclosed that Ripple payments have officially integrated with EUR and GBP International Bank Account Numbers (IBANs), marking a critical evolution in its offering. This suggests that Ripple is no longer just processing payments, but enabling institutional-grade banking functionality within its ecosystem.

Through partnerships with OpenPayd, Ripple is granting financial institutions access to programmable dollar liquidity. OpenPayd clients can now mint and burn the Ripple on-chain stablecoin, RLUSD, in real-time. The XRP analyst has called this new development a faster and potentially more efficient programmable USD liquidity on demand. He highlights that this capability also unlocks automated FX, compliance solutions, and seamless cross-border fund movement. 

Pumpius describes Ripple’s latest developments as a game-changing moment for blockchain-based finance. Rather than acting as a parallel system, the crypto company is now positioning itself as a new banking layer, built entirely outside the legacy infrastructure, but fully equipped to serve its institutional clientele.  

How Ripple Could Replace SWIFT’s Legacy

Pumpius’s X report suggests that Ripple’s evolution isn’t limited to just speed or low-cost payments. The core technology behind XRP and Ripple’s APIs aims to replace key functions of the SWIFT network, which currently facilitates interbank financial messaging and settlements globally. 

The analyst notes that Ripple’s model delivers what SWIFT does not, including real-time foreign exchange, end-to-end automated banking APIs, instant stablecoin-to-fiat conversion, and settlements via XRP. What makes the potential transition from SWIFT to Ripple even more tangible is the live infrastructure now running behind the crypto payment company’s system. 

According to Pumpius, liquidity corridors are no longer theoretical for Ripple, but operational. The company’s stablecoin rails are also highly active, while XRP has evolved from its status as a speculative asset into being used for final settlements in real financial flows. Overall, the integration of IBANs and the launch of RLUSD make Ripple a direct competitor to SWIFT. And as the analyst notes, these developments are more than incremental signs of growth—they mark a potential turning point in Ripple’s goal to replace SWIFT.

Ripple
XRP trading at $2.23 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

On June 28, 2026, an event titled "New Opportunities in AI Hardware: The Battle for Interactive Entry Points Begins" was held in Beijing. It featured a report from ITJuzi and discussions with experts from SoundAI, Ling Universe, One Reed Capital, and Zhongbo Juli on the opportunities and challenges in China's AI hardware sector. Key report findings highlight the sector's intense activity: 327 out of 431 startups founded post-2023 have secured funding, with 179 investments in H1 2026 alone. The landscape is dominated by embodied intelligent robots, while wearable tech like smart rings and AI glasses shows rapid growth. Geographically, Shenzhen leads, leveraging its superior hardware supply chain, followed by Beijing and Shanghai. The overarching trend is for companies to focus on micro-innovations within specific scenarios rather than reinventing foundational technology. Industry leaders shared several critical insights: 1. **Balancing Innovation & Market Readiness**: Entrepreneurs face the "hammer looking for a nail" dilemma. Success requires balancing technical capability with user acceptance, cost control, and incremental design improvements rather than chasing disruptive innovation. 2. **Competitive Landscape**: The future interactive entry point may not be a single super-device but a mix of universal terminals and specialized, scenario-specific hardware. While large companies have ecosystem advantages, startups can win by deeply targeting vertical markets and specific user groups. 3. **Core Challenges & Business Models**: Key hurdles include deep understanding of AI models and navigating non-transparent hardware supply chains. Viable business models may involve selling hardware at cost and generating revenue through software subscriptions, but this requires tight control over both hardware BOM and model inference costs. 4. **The Road to Commercialization**: The ultimate test is market validation—achieving sales growth and sustainable cash flow. Companies must find the right application scenario, use edge computing effectively, and close the loop from technology to commercial success. 5. **The Future of Interaction**: Proactive, context-aware interaction is the next frontier, though it's currently limited by issues like model hallucinations and environmental perception. The near-term focus should be on identifying target users and creating a coherent experience in specific domains, such as health wearables. In summary, to succeed in the competitive AI hardware arena, companies must strategically choose their niche, build a team with the right geographical advantages (e.g., leveraging Shenzhen's supply chain), and most importantly, execute a flawless commercialization strategy that translates technology into market-accepted products and sustainable business growth.

marsbit14m ago

Dialogue with Yihui Capital, SoundAI Technology, Ling Universe, and Zhongbo Jili: Opportunities and Challenges in the AI Smart Hardware Track

marsbit14m ago

CryptoQuant Founder: The Cost to Double BTC Has Increased by 20,000 Times, Where Will the $100 Billion Buying Power Come From?

CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju analyzes Bitcoin's current capital challenge. He notes that the cryptocurrency market has grown too large for retail-driven momentum alone to generate massive price increases as in past cycles. His calculations show that in 2011, approximately $2.7 million in capital inflow could push BTC's price up by 550x, whereas the current cycle requires an estimated $101 billion in new capital just for a 100% price increase. This shift underscores that sustaining a bull run now depends on attracting large-scale, long-term institutional capital rather than short-term speculative trading. Recent outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs, totaling nearly $10 billion since May, highlight the fragility of current demand and challenge the narrative of deep institutional support. While surveys indicate continued institutional interest, these entities prioritize regulated products, risk management, and portfolio integration over speculative gains. For the next significant bull market, Bitcoin must transition to being a core macro asset. The key drivers are no longer just more buyers, but capital allocation from larger, slower-moving entities like wealth advisors, corporate treasuries, banks, and sovereign wealth funds. This new phase pits Bitcoin against other major asset classes like AI for a share of institutional capital, making its growth trajectory dependent on sustained, high-quality inflows from diversified financial balance sheets.

marsbit18m ago

CryptoQuant Founder: The Cost to Double BTC Has Increased by 20,000 Times, Where Will the $100 Billion Buying Power Come From?

marsbit18m ago

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Circle and USDC Are Moving Beyond the Crypto World, Cross-Border Payments and AI Agents Become New Battlegrounds

Goldman Sachs published a summary of its meeting with Circle Internet Group (issuer of USDC) on July 5th. The core takeaway is that stablecoins, led by USDC, are evolving from a crypto-native tool into foundational infrastructure for traditional finance and the AI economy. USDC's use cases are rapidly expanding beyond crypto trading into cross-border payments, e-commerce, capital market settlements, and notably, payments for AI agents. Circle's management emphasized that stablecoin growth is now decoupled from crypto market cycles, driven by this diversification. They outlined five key application layers and highlighted USDC's network effects, global liquidity depth, and regulatory compliance as competitive moats. Circle distinguishes USDC from bank-issued tokenized deposits, arguing the former is an open, internet-native system without bank credit risk. Strategically, Circle is building a broader fintech platform with its Arc Layer 1 blockchain, the Circle Payments Network for cross-border transfers, and an "Agentic Stack" to serve AI agent economies, where USDC already dominates. Regarding regulation, Circle views potential U.S. legislation like the CLARITY Act as a catalyst for growth rather than a constraint, expecting it to encourage broader institutional adoption and active usage. Goldman Sachs maintains a Neutral rating on Circle with a $96 price target, noting the company's shift from a pure stablecoin issuer to a financial infrastructure provider. Key risks include competition from USDT and potential earnings pressure from declining interest rates on its reserve assets.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Circle and USDC Are Moving Beyond the Crypto World, Cross-Border Payments and AI Agents Become New Battlegrounds

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片