Дитон считает, что движение Ripple по скрытой дороге является лучшим примером конвергенции криптовалют и Уолл-стрит

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2024-12-28Last updated on 2025-04-28

  • Джон Дитон утверждает, что сделка Ripple Hidden Road является примером конвергенции DeFi и TradFi.
  • Чамат Палихапития отмечает, что количество сделок с криптовалютами утроилось в 2024 году всего за четыре месяца.
  • Ripple расширяет предложения по хранению и токенизации для удовлетворения институционального спроса

Адвокат Джон Дитон рассматривает приобретение Ripple Hidden Road за $1,25 млрд как ключевой пример слияния децентрализованных финансов с традиционными финансами. Его комментарии последовали за обновлением аналитика Чамата Палихапитии, показывающим, что слияния и листинги криптовалют в США уже достигли $8,2 млрд по 88 сделкам в начале 2025 года, что уже утроило общий объем за весь 2024 год.

Палихапития выделил пять основных тенденций сделок. Сюда входят слияния традиционных финансовых и криптоинфраструктурных компаний, поглощения биткоин-казначейства и консолидации бирж. По его словам, эти сдвиги закладывают основу для более полной интеграции криптофинансовой экосистемы.

По теме: Моника Лонг из Ripple о полезности XRP и почему ясность регулирования предшествует IPO

Палихапития выделил пять основных тенденций сделок. Сюда входят слияния традиционных финансовых и криптоинфраструктурных компаний, поглощения биткоин-казначейства и консолидации бирж. По его словам, эти сдвиги закладывают основу для более полной интеграции криптофинансовой экосистемы.

Дитон указал на действия Ripple в отношении Hidden Road как на хрестоматийный пример того, куда движется отрасль. Hidden Road — это первоклассная брокерская фирма, обрабатывающая более 3 триллионов долларов в год для более чем 300 институциональных клиентов. После приобретения Ripple Hidden Road будет использовать XRP Ledger (XRPL) для расчетов после торговли.

Интеграция сокращает время расчетов с 24 часов до 3-5 секунд. Более того, стейблкоин Ripple RLUSD служит обеспечением, связывая традиционные финансовые транзакции с технологией блокчейна.

Большая ставка Ripple: кастодиальное хранение, стейблкоины и институциональные услуги

Стратегия Ripple не ограничивается ускорением расчетов. Дитон также отметил более широкое продвижение Ripple в сфере услуг по хранению. Он сослался на приобретение Ripple Standard Custody вместе с Metaco с целью предложить учреждениям полный спектр решений на основе блокчейна. Ripple Custody дополняет платежные и стейблкоин-предложения компании, создавая универсальный магазин для финансовых учреждений.

По прогнозам Boston Consulting Group, к 2030 году объем рынка кастодиальных услуг превысит 16 триллионов долларов, и Ripple готовится к будущему росту.

По теме: Стейблкоин RLUSD от Ripple запущен для кредитования и заимствования на Aave V3

XRPL станет основой институциональной токенизации

Примечательно, что ожидается, что инфраструктура хранения Ripple будет поддерживать токенизацию как услугу. Банки вскоре смогут токенизировать традиционные активы, такие как акции, облигации и недвижимость на XRPL.

Между тем, RLUSD также будет играть ключевую роль в поддержке этих транзакций, помогая XRPL стать глобальным хабом для токенизированных активов. Дитон сказал, что агрессивные шаги Ripple отражают стремление восстановить импульс после ее юридической битвы с Комиссией по ценным бумагам и биржам США.

Related Reads

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

TRON's Nile testnet has deployed an upgrade implementing quantum-resistant signature cryptography, a proactive step to secure its ledger against potential future decryption threats from quantum computing. This development, confirmed via official sources like nileex.io and github.com, represents a notable Layer 1 security enhancement. The report emphasizes its relevance within the current market focus on stablecoins. Crucially, the upgrade is currently active only on the testnet, not the TRON mainnet. While providing a verified data point for the market to weigh, the article cautions that this single development should be considered alongside broader market factors and does not guarantee any specific price action. It stands as a snapshot of ongoing protocol development.

bitcoinist23m ago

TRON Nile Testnet Deploys Quantum-Resistant Signature Cryptography

bitcoinist23m ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

The BIS report, "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins," highlights that the primary risks of stablecoins extend beyond potential de-pegging. It argues that the core challenge is whether stablecoins can be integrated into a financial system that is identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable. While acknowledging efficiency gains like faster payments and programmability, BIS emphasizes that money requires an institutional framework—including legal certainty, liquidity support, and financial integrity controls—which many stablecoins currently lack. The report details compliance risks, noting that while blockchain transactions are transparent, address visibility does not equate to identity or purpose clarity. This creates a systemic risk as pseudonymity, non-custodial wallets, and cross-chain bridges can undermine AML/CFT controls. Furthermore, these risks can spill over into the traditional financial system through on- and off-ramps. The future direction, per BIS, is not to prohibit innovation but to embed regulatory rules—such as identity verification and transaction screening—directly into the technological infrastructure of tokenized finance. The key takeaway for compliance is that any new financial instrument must clearly address questions of customer identification, transaction monitoring, accountability, and cross-border rule consistency to be viable as a mainstream payment tool.

marsbit52m ago

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The True Risks of Stablecoins Go Beyond 'De-pegging'

marsbit52m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

When Silicon Valley Giants Turn to Chinese AI Models to Cut Costs A surprising trend is emerging: major U.S. tech companies are significantly reducing AI costs by switching to Chinese models. Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, reportedly halved its AI spending after migrating to China's GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7 models, despite increasing usage. They achieved this through a sophisticated three-part strategy: implementing an automatic routing system to select the most cost-effective model per task, boosting cache hit rates from 5% to 60% to reuse computations, and employing "context engineering" to provide AI with more precise, less cluttered information. They are not alone. AI startup Lindy switched from Claude to DeepSeek, saving millions, while Snowflake's tests found GLM-5.2 solved 66% of coding tasks compared to Claude Opus's 67%—but at a fraction of the cost (output pricing is 5-7 times lower). While the top Western models may offer slightly better stability, the massive price differential is leading many businesses to reconsider their value proposition. This shift signals a deeper change in the AI industry, moving beyond pure performance benchmarks to a fierce cost competition. As pressure mounts, even OpenAI and Anthropic have begun slashing prices. For users, this means more choices, lower costs, and a crucial lesson: using multiple models based on task complexity, optimizing with caching, and keeping contexts lean are now key to leveraging AI efficiently and affordably.

marsbit59m ago

When US Giants Collectively "Defect" to Chinese AI Models

marsbit59m ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

BIS Report Compliance Observations: The real risks of stablecoins go beyond "depegging" The BIS report "Anchoring trust in money: innovation beyond stablecoins" argues that while stablecoins and tokenization offer efficiency gains, their primary risk lies in fitting into an identifiable, monitorable, accountable, and regulatable financial system. Money's trust stems not just from technology but from institutional arrangements: a common unit of account, guaranteed redemption at par, liquidity support, regulatory frameworks, and financial integrity requirements. Stablecoins, operating on permissionless blockchains with pseudo-anonymity and non-custodial wallets, create systemic compliance gaps: unclear customer identity, incomplete fund origins, unexplained transaction purposes, fragmented cross-chain paths, and ambiguous liability. On-chain transparency does not equal compliance transparency. Public addresses don't reveal identity or intent. While blockchain analytics aid law enforcement, they cannot replace routine, large-scale AML/CFT controls. Effective compliance requires a closed-loop process encompassing customer onboarding, transaction monitoring, investigation, reporting, and audit. Stablecoin risks are not confined to the blockchain; they re-enter the traditional financial system via on/off-ramps, exchanges, and payment institutions. This forces banks to monitor client accounts for activity linked to virtual assets. The future direction is not to prohibit innovation but to embed rules into the technology. Tokenized finance should integrate with the existing two-tier monetary system, embedding compliance—like customer identification, pre-transaction screening, and auditable data trails—directly into the transaction flow. For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is that any new financial instrument must answer core questions: Who identifies the customer? Who monitors transactions? Who handles exceptions? Who is liable? Compliance is not the antithesis of innovation but the essential infrastructure for its sustainable growth.

链捕手1h ago

BIS Report Compliance Watch: The Real Risks of Stablecoins Are Not Just 'De-pegging'

链捕手1h ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

Summary: The trend of major U.S. technology firms adopting more cost-effective Chinese AI models is gaining momentum. A prime example is Coinbase, the largest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, which reportedly halved its AI expenditure by switching to Chinese models GLM-5.2 and Kimi 2.7, while its usage volume increased. This was achieved through a sophisticated cost-saving system featuring intelligent model routing (selecting the most suitable model per task), dramatically improving cache hit rates from 5% to 60%, and implementing "Context Engineering" to streamline prompts. This shift is not isolated. Other companies like the AI startup Lindy and data cloud firm Snowflake are making similar moves, drawn by the significant price disparity. For instance, GLM-5.2 costs $1.40/$4.40 per million tokens (input/output), compared to $5/$25 for Claude Opus 4.7. While top Western models may offer slightly higher stability or speed in complex tasks, the performance gap is narrowing, making the price difference harder to justify for many enterprise use cases. The implications are significant for both businesses and individual users. It highlights the importance of a multi-model strategy based on task requirements, the value of caching and reusing outputs, and the effectiveness of providing concise context. Ultimately, this migration signals a potential reshaping of the AI industry's pricing model, moving competition from pure performance benchmarks to practical cost-effectiveness, with increased choice and downward price pressure benefiting end-users.

链捕手1h ago

When American Giants 'Defect' to Chinese AI Models

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow