По какому курсу стоит продать Solana для получения максимальной прибыли?

investing.ruPublished on 2024-11-17Last updated on 2024-11-17

Happycoin.club - 17 ноября на рынке Solana произошёл очередной прорыв, поэтому назрел вопрос о том, по какому курсу стоит продать криптовалюту для максимизации прибыли.

В воскресенье стоимость Solana пробила верхнюю границу сокращающегося треугольника, который начал формироваться 12 ноября. Учитывая ширину фигуры, становится очевидным, что монета подорожает как минимум до $250 в ближайшее время.

Пробитие сокращающегося треугольника на графике изменения цены Solana

Технические индикаторы указывают на продолжение бычьего ралли. Например, на суточном графике индекс Average Directional Index существенно превышает 25 и составляет 35,37, что свидетельствует о сохранении восходящей тенденции, а индекс RSI, достигший 74, пока не попал в зону перекупленности.

Показатели блокчейна Solana тоже сигнализируют о восходящем движении. Стоимость стейкинговых SOL резко увеличилась и превысила $8 млрд, а объём торгов на децентрализованных биржах, работающих в сети SOL с 10 по 15 ноября, достиг очень высокого показателя на отметке $16 млрд.

Изменение стоимости заблокированных монет Solana

Все вышеперечисленные факторы говорят о том, что быки не остановятся на $250. Скорее всего, памп продолжится, и цена Solana обновит исторический максимум, зафиксированный в ноябре 2021 года в районе $260.

В этом случае стоимость SOL должна повыситься до отметки $321, расположенной на 1,236 уровня Фибоначчи от предыдущего максимума. Соответственно, Solana можно будет продать по курсу $321, заработав таким образом прибыль в размере 35% в случае покупки монет по текущей цене.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Happycoin.club

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbit4h ago

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbit4h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit4h ago

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片