股价新高之际,解析Microstrategy的上涨“永动机”

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-10-10Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-10-10

Introduzione

“Microstrategy已成为了一头怪物,它可能变成世界上最具价值的公司。”

原文作者:Glenn Hodl

编译|Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

译者|Azuma(@azuma_eth

编者按:

加密货币市场的走势仍扑朔迷离,但与比特币强绑定的 Microstrategy(MSTR)近期却创下了股价的历史新高 —— 美股行情显示, 10 月 9 日 MSTR 一度逼近 200 美元大关,最高冲至 198.35 美元。 

近期,海外 KOL Glenn Hodl 针对 Microstrategy 的强劲表示给出了自己的分析。Gelnn 认为即便是在比特币价格不再增长的情况下,Microstrategy 也可利用市场对于商品和公司的估值模式差异来创建可持续推高自身市值的“永动机”,这最终将使 Microstrategy 成为世界上市值最大的公司。

以下为 Gelnn 原文内容,由 Odaily 星球日报编译。

股价新高之际,解析Microstrategy的上涨“永动机”

Microstrategy 的首席执行官 Michael Saylor 似乎已找了一个“永动机”般的经济模型。

我不确定该机制能否被阻止,但如果该机制继续运转下去的话,Microstrategy 很有可能会成为世界上最具价值的公司。

究其原因,对某家公司进行估值的方式与对比特币等商品进行估值的方式存在着本质的区别,这就使得市场在对 Microstrategy(MSTR)进行估值时产生了一个悖论 —— 商品总是以当前的价格进行交易;而公司则会以其未来价值的折扣价格进行交易。

因此,如果你相信比特币在未来的某个时候会变得更值钱,那么 Microstrategy 所持有的比特币也将会且应该变得更值钱。 

这就可能造成一个“二阶效应”,即 Microstrategy 可以不断地去捕捉这一溢价预期,这即增强了其叙事的吸引力,也能助推其市值的不断走高。

可能有些读者依旧不太理解,以下是一个静态的超简化版本。

现在有一家公司,该公司发行了 10 股股票,同时持有 10 个比特币。

假设当前比特币的现货价格为 2 美元,而市场则预计它将涨至最少 4 美元。依照对公司进行估值的模式(以其未来价值的折扣价格进行交易,假设折扣率为 50% ),该公司的股价将为 3 美元,较其资产净值溢价 50% 。

该公司的老板发现这里存在一个机会,于是他又以市场价格发行了 2 股新股,再用这 6 美元从市场上收购了 3 枚比特币。

现在,这家公司一共发行了 12 股股票,持有 13 枚比特币,“比特币持仓 / 股票发行量”的比例从 1: 1 变成了 1.08: 1 。

关键点在于,现在这家公司的市值为 36 美元,财库价值则为 26 美元,溢价率已缩减到了 38% (反之即折扣率放大到了 62% ),但市场仍将以未来价值的 50% 折扣率来对该公司进行估值,这将助推该公司的市值上涨至 39 美元,对应单股价格为 3.25 美元。

溢价修复后,该公司的老板可以再次重复上述路径,即以市场价格发行 2 股新股,再用这 6.5 美元从市场上买进 3.25 枚比特币。

现在,股票发行量达到了 14 股,比特币持仓则到了 16.25 枚,“比特币持仓 / 股票发行量”的比例从 1.08: 1 变成了 1.16: 1 。

之后,随着市场再次依照“以未来价值的 50% 折扣来对该公司进行估值”的路径修复溢价状况,该公司的市值将被推高至 48.75 美元,对应股价略低于 3.5 美元。

到现在为止,虽然比特币的价格并未发生任何变化,溢价率也回归了 50% ,但该公司“比特币持仓 / 股票发行量”的比例已增长了 16% ,股价同样增长了约 16% 。

至此,一个怪物的雏形就已经诞生。该公司可以不断重复上述流程,利用市场对商品及公司估值模式的差异来创造永动机,而市场则将不断提高对该的估值,一是因为比特币的未来价值将会增加,二是因为该公司“比特币持仓 / 股票发行量”的比例也在在不断提高。 

Microstrategy 就是这只怪物,它有望将成市值最大的公司。

Letture associate

Competitors Going Public, Kimi Can't Sit Still

Competitors Go Public, Kimi Feels the Pressure Yue Zhi An Mian (Moonshot AI), the company behind the AI assistant Kimi, has begun dismantling its VIE and red-chip structure, clearing a key obstacle for a potential Hong Kong IPO. This marks a significant shift from six months ago when founder Yang Zhilin stated the company was in "no hurry" to list. The move comes as rivals like Zhipu AI and MiniMax have successfully listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in early 2026, experiencing massive surges in market value. This has reset valuation logic for AI companies, turning "going public" from an end goal into a competitive necessity. Analysts suggest Kimi is both seizing a favorable market window and responding to competitive pressure. Kimi's valuation has skyrocketed from around $3 billion at its 2023 founding to over $20 billion by May 2026. Capital is betting on its potential as a future AI platform and gateway, though some caution this "emotional valuation" depends on sustained technological leadership and successful commercialization. Traditionally focused on core model R&D over user growth, Kimi has recently pivoted strategy. While its monthly active users declined through 2025, it shifted focus to Agent development and reducing marketing spend. The release of its K2.5 model in early 2026 reportedly generated substantial revenue, with annual recurring revenue reaching $200 million by April, driven by subscriptions and API services. A $2 billion D-round financing in May signaled investor approval of this commercial shift. However, listing will bring new pressures. Experts predict a listed Kimi would face stricter scrutiny on financial controls, compliance, and R&D efficiency. The narrative must evolve from pure technological breakthroughs to demonstrating clear commercialization paths, sustainable income, and a defensible valuation, balancing model superiority with business performance.

marsbit7 min fa

Competitors Going Public, Kimi Can't Sit Still

marsbit7 min fa

End of the 'Gray Era' for Hong Kong and US Stock Trading Accounts: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

Hong Kong and US stock “grey account opening era” ends, where can your money go? In a coordinated regulatory crackdown starting May 22nd, Hong Kong's SFC and China's securities regulator have targeted the previously common but legally ambiguous practice of mainland Chinese investors opening accounts with Hong Kong brokers to trade Hong Kong and US stocks. The SFC issued a stern circular after a review of 12 brokerages, citing major deficiencies including inadequate due diligence, acceptance of suspicious or forged documents, and weak management of cross-border relationships. New requirements mandate mainland clients to submit a written declaration confirming their investment funds originate from *outside* mainland China, the account has never been closed for using suspicious documents, and agreeing to information disclosure. Brokers must immediately close accounts opened with suspicious documents and dormant accounts. Simultaneously, Chinese authorities launched a two-year campaign to rectify illegal cross-border securities activities. Key internet brokers like Futu, Tiger Brokers, and Longbridge are facing penalties, with existing accounts allowed only to sell/withdraw funds, not add new ones. The impact is immediate. Reports from social media and financial news outlets confirm that individuals traveling to Hong Kong to open accounts are now required to sign the new declaration. However, even after signing, applications are frequently rejected. The declaration shifts compliance responsibility to the client and acts as a filter, as most mainland investors' funds do not legally meet the "from outside China" criterion. Major brokers like Futu and Tiger have stopped accepting new mainland clients. A few, such as uSmart Securities, Fosun Wealth, and Cheerful Investment, still offer limited channels, but approvals have tightened significantly. Crucially, funding must now come exclusively from the investor's own bank account in Hong Kong or a qualified jurisdiction, blocking previous workarounds like using money changers or stablecoins. For mainland investors, compliant pathways still exist but are narrower. Individuals with overseas status (students, work visa holders) and verifiable offshore funds may still qualify. Official channels like Stock Connect, QDII, and the Cross-boundary Wealth Management Connect remain fully compliant options, albeit with product and quota limitations. On-chain alternatives exist but carry their own regulatory uncertainties and often exclude mainland users. The crackdown signals the end of the lax expansion period for Hong Kong brokers targeting mainland clients. While investment opportunities persist, the era of easy, low-compliance access is over. Investors must now carefully assess their eligibility and understand that signing the new declaration carries personal legal liability.

Odaily星球日报55 min fa

End of the 'Gray Era' for Hong Kong and US Stock Trading Accounts: Where Can Your Money Go Now?

Odaily星球日报55 min fa

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: A Quick Guide to 17 Related Stocks

**Title: SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: Analysis of 17 Related Stocks** SpaceX is set to IPO on Nasdaq with a $1.75 trillion valuation. The real value driver is Starlink, contributing 61% of Q1 revenue with high margins. Its valuation heavily depends on future execution, including user growth despite falling ARPU. Key stocks have already surged pre-IPO. Tesla (TSLA, +10%) is a primary beneficiary due to deep integration with SpaceX in chip design and AI. Rocket Lab (RKLB, +89%) is seen as a "mini-SpaceX," but faces risk from potential Neutron rocket delays. AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) competes in the same satellite-to-phone market as Starlink. Firefly (FLY, +70%) is a strong government contractor in lunar services. Partners like EchoStar (SATS), Planet Labs (PL), and T-Mobile (TMUS) will see revaluation. Suppliers like Qualcomm (QCOM, +57%) are critical ecosystem "picks and shovels." Investment vehicles like DXYZ (+80%) hold significant SpaceX stakes but trade at high premiums, which may collapse post-IPO. Redwire (RDW) is highlighted as an under-the-radar "pick and shovel" play in space components, with growth in defense contracts and microgravity pharmaceuticals. The article warns that much of the positive news is already priced in, and a post-IPO sell-off is possible. Large IPOs often underperform initially. Key risks include Starship delays, ARPU decline, and unforeseen black swan events affecting Elon Musk or space operations. Investors are advised to focus on companies with solid fundamentals and manage overall sector exposure carefully.

marsbit57 min fa

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: A Quick Guide to 17 Related Stocks

marsbit57 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片