今日 Meme 角度大赏:魔性狗子 + 可爱小猫,半天之内再现千倍涨幅?

链捕手Published on 2024-09-29Last updated on 2024-09-29

作者:深潮 TechFlow

 

今天是 2024 年 9 月 29 日,一个普通的休(补)息(班)日,链上行情同样没有休息。从夜里到上午,勤奋的链上选手们又有新的收获,出现几个新角度的 Meme 金狗:狗币 $Doge 创始人 Shibetoshi Nakamoto 的新小猫 caramelo、魔性狗子 Point of dog.....

这些新概念是什么情况,又有哪些同名金狗跑出来?话不多说,Let‘s 盘点!

注:Meme 代币价格波动剧烈,存在高度风险,投资者应充分评估风险,谨慎参与。本文仅根据市场热点进行信息搬运分享,作者及平台对文章内容的完整性、准确性不做任何担保,同时本文无任何投资建议。

魔性狗子 Point of dog

今天刚睁眼,又被新的狗子 Meme $POD 的热度与涨幅刷屏。稍微了解一下,发现这次的狗子 Meme 不是某个名流政要或者创始人的宠物,而是一个比较“Meme”的抽象形象:Point of dog(狗子视角)

从刷屏的图片来看,Point of dog 更多像是一个纯 Meme 角色,整体形象只有一个狗子的后脑勺,植入各种图片,起到一个「观察者」的形象,这种抽象+方便快速二创的 IP 算是 Meme 爱好者比较中意的标的。(Belike 另一个爆火的 Solana Meme $MICHI )

当然光有好玩的 IP 只是第一步,阴谋集团虽迟但到。$POD 今天凌晨 2 点上线 Pump.fun,半小时左右直接打满。

从 Pump.fun 发射后就是熟悉的手法,一路狂拉,上线半天不到最高市值超过 1000 万美元,现回落至 460 万美元附近,上线 12 小时成交额已经有 2200 万美元成交额。

阴谋集团的痕迹着实明显,一句废话也没有,纯纯拉盘,别的不干。

狗币创始人的新猫 caramelo($melo)

这边魔性狗子 $POD 的拉盘还没结束,前几天 ETH 主网大热的「狗币创始人」概念主角 Shibetoshi Nakamoto 在上午 9:41 分又发推文晒出新的家庭成员小猫 caramelo,并“贴心”地给出了小猫的缩写 melo。(深潮注:小猫是挺可爱的)

Shibetoshi Nakamoto 这边推文刚出,同名代币 $melo 立马安排上,熟悉的大写vs小写、ETH vs Solana、缩写vs全名......

更有甚者推文刚发出不到俩小时项目就已经完成 CTO 了哈......

当前 melo 概念交易量比较大的有以下几个代币:

  1. melo($melo)- ETH

24H 交易量:290 万美元

当前市值:77 万美元

最高市值:100 万美元

当前 ETH 链市值最高的 melo 概念币,从名字上看算是占了“小写”的坑。GMGN.AI 监测工具显示 DEV 自己买入了很多次, TOP10 持仓较多。

  1. Caramelo($MELO)- ETH

24H 交易量:330 万美元

当前市值:56.7 万美元

最高市值:200 万美元

当前 ETH 链交易量最高的 melo 概念币,名称大写,代币一开始冲高后回落,应该是一开始大家猛冲的大写分支。

  1. caramelo($MELO)- ETH

24H 交易量:14.6 万美元

当前市值:50 万美元

最高市值:62 万美元

这个代币发币比前两个晚,市值与交易量也小了不少,截至撰稿还未出现深度回调。但是仍有较多的狙击用户手中筹码未清,且 TOP10 的持仓占比较高,潜在抛压很大。

  1. Caramelo($MELO)- Solana

24H 交易量:360 万美元

当前市值:510 万美元

最高市值:1010 万美元

ETH 主网的 $melo 们争奇斗艳,Solana 这边就比较专一。从 Pump.fun 中跑出来的 $MELO 顶着拉满的风险提示直接冲击千万市值,颇有阴谋集团的作风。

Meme 参与风险非常之高,机会无限,本金有限。不要 Fomo,不要梭哈,Over。

Related Reads

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbit3h ago

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbit3h ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit4h ago

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片