Джереми Эллайр объявил о переносе штаб-квартиры Circle в США

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2021-09-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-09-14

Генеральный директор компании Circle, эмитента второго по рыночной капитализации стейблкоина USDC, Джереми Эллайр объявил о переносе штаб-квартиры компании в Нью-Йорк.

Джереми Эллайр (Jeremy Allaire) провел в соцсети Х виртуальный тур по новому офису компании в центральном здании комплекса Всемирного торгового центра в нижнем Манхэттене One World Trade Center.

«Сегодня мы празднуем открытие новой штаб-квартиры. К нам в Нью-Йорке присоединились представители отрасли, политики и ключевые партнеры, которые сыграли ключевую роль в росте и успехе Circle. Присоединяйтесь к нам на этом этапе нашего пути. Мы инвестируем в Нью-Йорк. Мы инвестируем в Америку», — написал Эллайр.

Глава Circle уточнил, что штаб-квартира Circle строится не как традиционный офис, а как пространство для создания новой финансовой интернет-системы и встреч для совместной работы заинтересованных лиц. Новый офис приступит к работе в начале 2025 года.

Слухи том, что холдинг Circle Internet Financial намерен перебазироваться из Ирландии в США, появились еще в мае. Официальным поводом для смены юрисдикции называлось намерение Circle провести IPO в Соединенных Штатах, о чем компания уведомила Комиссию по ценным бумагам и биржам США (SEC) в январе.

На тот момент в Circle уточнили, что подробности о количестве акций и ценах еще не определены, а смена юрисдикции будет совпадать по времени с выходом на IPO, которое зависит от рыночных условий и сроков одобрения SEC.

Ранее стало известно, что Circle получила лицензию от Electronic Money Institution (EMI) на операции со стейблкоинами, в соответствии с законом о регулировании криптовалют в Евросоюзе (MiCA).

Letture associate

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

Citi Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Lacks Substantive Progress, Faces Supply Bottlenecks in Short Term. Reuters reported on August 4th that the U.S. government and FCC are considering a ban on Chinese optical modules. Citi's August 9th report clarifies that optical modules are not listed on any effective FCC ban. The FCC's Order 26-50 established two restricted list mechanisms (based on manufacturer and production location), but optical modules were only mentioned once, as an example in a disclosure requirement, not as a restricted product. The reported ban remains at a proposal stage. Citi estimates Chinese suppliers provide 60-70% of high-speed optical modules for U.S. hyperscalers. Non-Chinese suppliers cannot fill this gap in the short term, making the immediate implementation of a genuine ban unlikely. Future regulatory paths could be manufacturer-based (least likely), location-based covering all offshore production (strictest), or location-based covering only China (more feasible but with unresolved definitions). A ban would pressure U.S. AI infrastructure, conflicting with stated policy goals. Citi sees low near-term implementation probability, with the issue potentially becoming a negotiation chip in bilateral talks. U.S. domestic capacity build-out is a key long-term variable. Among Chinese companies, XSENS and Dongshan Precision have the highest U.S. exposure, while Tianfu Communication, as a passive component supplier, is relatively insulated. Citi maintains Buy ratings on all three with respective price targets. The conclusion is that Chinese modules are currently irreplaceable in the U.S. AI supply chain, creating a longer timeline for potential restrictions than the market may expect.

marsbit19 min fa

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

marsbit19 min fa

Lead Analyst Claims Bitcoin is at a Critical Stage: 'We are at the Bear Market Bottom, What Happens Next…'

Renowned cryptocurrency analyst Benjamin Cowen, in his latest analysis video, examined recent events and historical cycles in the Bitcoin market. Noting Bitcoin's trading range of $64,000 to $65,000, Cowen stated that market dynamics and investor interest show similarities to past cycles, suggesting the upcoming period marks a critical turning point. Cowen observed a significant decline in public interest and investor enthusiasm for the crypto market, with social risk metrics falling to 0.2, far below levels seen four years ago. He added that market volatility has notably decreased, and a sense of distrust prevails among investors, drawing parallels to the ends of bear markets in 2018 and 2022. Historical data indicates Bitcoin markets typically bottom in summer months, followed by a period of stagnation with low volatility, implying a major move could occur in the year's final quarter. However, Cowen noted on-chain indicators like the MVRV Z-Score have not yet signaled a definitive bottom. Cowen believes an event in the coming weeks could shake the market, potentially triggering a final sell-off wave. Such an event, he argues, would bring investors back and pave the way for a new bull cycle. He predicts October as the most likely bottoming period, while acknowledging September or November are also possible, advising crypto users to remain cautious and prepared for a decisive market moment.

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

Lead Analyst Claims Bitcoin is at a Critical Stage: 'We are at the Bear Market Bottom, What Happens Next…'

cryptonews.ru28 min fa

Bitcoin Community in Uproar: Deciphering the New Scaling War Sparked by BIP-110

On August 10, Luke Dashjr, a long-time Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) editor and co-founder of Ocean mining pool, was removed from the BIP editing team for bypassing discussion protocols and preemptively assigning a number to BIP-110, a controversial soft fork proposal he helped draft. The conflict stems from Bitcoin Core's version 30 release in October 2025, which removed the default 83-byte limit on OP_RETURN, a field used for embedding non-transaction data. In response, BIP-110 aimed to enforce this limit as a consensus rule. It controversially lowered the activation threshold for miners to 55% and included a mandatory activation clause, causing significant community backlash. Major mining pools like Foundry USA and AntPool did not support it, with public criticism from figures like F2Pool's Wang Chun and Michael Saylor, who argued it compromised Bitcoin's neutrality. On August 8, at block height 961,632, nodes running the BIP-110 patch rejected the main chain block, causing a chain split. The minority chain, supported by only about 2.53% of the network's hash rate, produced just one additional block before stalling. The main chain quickly outpaced it by over 240 blocks. No major exchanges have supported the minority chain. The event highlighted Bitcoin's governance reality: while rules can be proposed by a few, ultimate authority lies with the economic majority—miners willing to expend hash power and users/exchanges recognizing a chain's validity. Following the failed split, BIP-110 proponents, including Luke Dashjr, have begun discussing a change to the proof-of-work algorithm to create a separate coin, though this remains in early discussion stages.

marsbit49 min fa

Bitcoin Community in Uproar: Deciphering the New Scaling War Sparked by BIP-110

marsbit49 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片