Analyst Says Bitcoin 4-Year Cycles Are Over, Here’s Why

bitcoinistPublished on 2024-09-13Last updated on 2024-09-13

Abstract

Popular analyst Justin Bennett has explained why the Bitcoin four-year cycle might be over for the foreseeable future. He indicated...

Popular analyst Justin Bennett has explained why the Bitcoin four-year cycle might be over for the foreseeable future. He indicated that the crypto’s projected price surge in this market cycle might not happen as planned and that Bitcoin could suffer a severe price crash soon enough. 

Why The Bitcoin Four-Year Cycle Might Be Over

In an X (formerly Twitter) post, Bennett asserted that Bitcoin follows business cycles while explaining why the leading crypto might be on the verge of a new era. He noted that the leading crypto has been following the perfect four-year cycles since its inception, witnessing two years of a bear market and a bull market. 

However, he suggested that this could be set to change since Bitcoin’s correlation with business cycles means that a contraction would end these four-year cycles. To prove that Bitcoin follows business cycles, Bennett highlighted how Bitcoin has tracked the US Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) from the start. 

Bitcoin 4-year cycle
Source: X

This index measures an economy’s health using the manufacturing and service sectors. The accompanying chart shows that BTC’s price has risen whenever the PMI does and drops whenever the index declines. In line with this, Bennett claimed that the correlation will still exist during the next short-term or long-term contraction. 

Interestingly, this contraction might already be imminent, which is why Bitcoin’s four-year cycle could be over. The US PMI is at a current price level of 47.20, representing a contraction. A contraction is when a country’s economy is declining, which could be said of the US at the moment as the Federal Reserve struggles to bring inflation down to its desired target while avoiding a recession. 

It is also worth mentioning that the US’s economic situation has majorly contributed to BTC’s stagnant price action since it reached a new all-time high (ATH) in March. Bitcoin investors have remained cautious as the US inflation data and job reports have shown how frail the US economy is. 

What This Means For BTC’s Price

Bennett noted that Bitcoin’s correlation with business cycles doesn’t mean its price cannot move higher. However, he remarked that people need to understand that BTC is a risk asset fueled by the economic conditions of post-2008. He added that it is not “programmed to go up” as crypto analysts have projected, neither is it destined to follow a “rainbow chart or stock-to-flow model.” 

The analyst’s perspective has undoubtedly cast doubt on bullish predictions based on halving cycles. Historically, Bitcoin hits new highs 16 to 18 months after the halving event. However, with Bennett suggesting that this perfect cycle might be over, this might not be the case this time. This cycle has already proven to be different, considering the flagship crypto hit a new ATH before the halving, which has never happened before. 

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at around $57,900, down almost 1% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap. 

Bitcoin price chart from Tradingview.com
BTC price struggling to hold $58,000 | Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview.com
Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com
Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Related Reads

Morning Brief | Deloitte Acquires Crypto Infrastructure Firm Blocknative; Stablecoin Firm Checker Raises $8M; a16z Likely Becomes Largest External Holder of HYPE

ChainCatcher Daily Update - May 21st Major headlines include Deloitte's acquisition of crypto infrastructure firm Blocknative, signaling further traditional finance adoption. In funding news, stablecoin infrastructure company Checker secured $8 million, while decentralized derivatives platform Variational raised $50 million in a Series A round led by Dragonfly Capital. Significant corporate moves saw Tether acquire SoftBank's entire stake in Twenty One Capital (XXI), and Mastercard pivot its strategy by investing in BVNK for stablecoin payments after abandoning Zerohash. VC giant Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) is reported to be a major external holder of HYPE, with positions exceeding $356 million. On the institutional front, MicroStrategy's CEO noted that 13 of its top 15 institutional shareholders increased their $MSTR holdings in Q1 2026, with aggregate positions growing 27%. Meanwhile, the parent company of the NYSE, ICE, announced plans to launch a futures market for AI computing power ("hashrate"). The report also features a "Meme Hot List" ranking trending tokens on Ethereum, Solana, and Base networks, and highlights several key articles. These include an analysis of renowned investor Duan Yongping's first crypto investment in Circle, concerns over talent drain and institutional selling pressure at the Ethereum Foundation, the growing business of crypto asset recovery, and an examination of the trillion-dollar potential and remaining hurdles for the tokenized asset market.

链捕手4m ago

Morning Brief | Deloitte Acquires Crypto Infrastructure Firm Blocknative; Stablecoin Firm Checker Raises $8M; a16z Likely Becomes Largest External Holder of HYPE

链捕手4m ago

147 Trillion vs 70 Billion: The Rise of On-Chain 'Risk Managers' and the Potential Dawn of a New Era in DeFi Asset Management

"147 Trillion vs 70 Billion: The Rise of On-Chain 'Risk Managers' and the Potential Dawn of a New Era in DeFi Asset Management" Key Points: The role of professional asset managers is emerging in DeFi, ending the era where protocols and governance dictated everything. While early DeFi protocols like Aave and Compound bundled risk management within their code, innovations like Morpho have separated infrastructure from risk judgment. This allows specialized "Risk Managers" to operate independent lending vaults, acting as on-chain asset managers. The market, though early with ~$7B in assets under management (AUM), is rapidly consolidating around top performers like SteakhouseFi (RWA focus), SentoraHQ (AI-driven models), and Gauntlet (crisis management). This modular structure mirrors TradFi's division of labor: distributors (e.g., exchanges) source capital, Risk Managers design strategies and set standards, and underlying protocols handle custody and execution. For traditional asset managers, this familiar structure presents clear entry paths: 1) **Distribution**: Partnering with Risk Managers as a backend service. 2) **Supply**: Bringing real-world assets (RWA) on-chain as collateral. 3) **Operation**: Becoming a Risk Manager themselves (e.g., Bitwise). The core competency required is shifting from coding to traditional risk underwriting and financial expertise—areas where established institutions hold a natural advantage. While the current DeFi market (~$80B) is minuscule compared to global asset management (~$147T), it represents a significant growth runway. The teams that build the trusted standards and rails for risk-managed capital now are poised to define the market's future as institutional capital seeks secure on-ramps.

marsbit12m ago

147 Trillion vs 70 Billion: The Rise of On-Chain 'Risk Managers' and the Potential Dawn of a New Era in DeFi Asset Management

marsbit12m ago

Sui Launches Gasless Stablecoin Transfers, Supported by Fireblocks

Sui has officially launched "Gasless Stablecoin Transfers," a new protocol-level feature enabling users and enterprises to send supported stablecoins on Sui without paying gas fees or needing a separate SUI token balance. As the feature rolls out, stablecoin transfer fees on Sui are now effectively $0. Major stablecoins like USDsui, suiUSDe, AUSD, FDUSD, USDB, USDC, and USDY are already supported. This aims to simplify payments and remove a key barrier to mass adoption: requiring users to hold another token for gas. The enterprise platform Fireblocks, securing over $14 trillion in digital asset transactions, has integrated the feature in advance, enhancing institutional accessibility. Other wallets and custodians are also set to support zero-gas transactions. Sui co-founder Adeniyi Abiodun stated this brings Sui closer to being a global payment rail. Fireblocks' Ran Goldi noted it removes a major friction point for businesses building on-chain payments. This is a permanent structural change to Sui's mainnet, not a subsidy. It positions Sui as low-cost infrastructure for enterprises, traders, and AI agents. Sui's stablecoin transfer volume has surpassed $1 trillion since August 2025, with its architecture supporting high-frequency payments. Recent growth includes three SUI Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs) launching in 2026 and the expansion of major stablecoin projects like USDsui and SuiUSDe on the network. Zero-gas stablecoin transfers are now being gradually deployed on the Sui mainnet.

marsbit13m ago

Sui Launches Gasless Stablecoin Transfers, Supported by Fireblocks

marsbit13m ago

Major AI Collaboration Breakthrough! Stanford and NVIDIA Jointly Eliminate AI Communication Overhead, Boosting Reasoning Speed by 2.4x

Title: AI Collaboration Breakthrough: Stanford & NVIDIA Eliminate Communication Overhead, Boost Reasoning Speed by 2.4x A new approach called RecursiveMAS, developed by UIUC, Stanford, NVIDIA, and MIT, tackles the major bottleneck in multi-agent AI systems: the "language tax." Currently, AI agents collaborate by generating and reading natural language text, a slow, costly, and information-lossy process akin to inefficient radio communication. RecursiveMAS bypasses this by enabling agents to communicate directly through their "thoughts"—latent space vector representations—instead of text. Inspired by recursive language models, it treats each agent like a reusable layer in a recursive loop. A special lightweight module called RecursiveLink passes these high-dimensional, semantic-rich internal states between agents. Only the final agent decodes the last latent representation into human-readable text. This process, described as "telepathic" communication, dramatically cuts the overhead of encoding and decoding text at each step. The system is highly efficient; the core AI model weights remain frozen, and only the small RecursiveLink modules are trained, requiring updates to just 0.31% of total parameters. This reduces training costs by over 50% compared to full fine-tuning. Comprehensive evaluations across math, science, coding, and QA benchmarks show significant improvements: - **Accuracy:** Average increase of 8.3%, with gains up to 18.1% on complex math problems (AIME2025). - **Speed:** End-to-end reasoning is 1.2x to 2.4x faster, with greater speedups as recursive depth increases. - **Cost:** Token usage is reduced by 34.6% to 75.6%. The research suggests a new scaling paradigm for multi-agent systems: deepening recursive collaboration depth rather than merely adding more agents. This could address key production barriers like compute cost, latency, and memory limits. However, challenges remain, including the need for independent verification, compatibility between different AI models (heterogeneous agents), reduced interpretability of the "black-box" latent communication, and adaptation to complex real-world workflows involving tools and human interaction. If validated, RecursiveMAS could fundamentally change how AI agents work together, moving beyond inefficient "textual handoffs" to more seamless and powerful collaborative reasoning.

marsbit1h ago

Major AI Collaboration Breakthrough! Stanford and NVIDIA Jointly Eliminate AI Communication Overhead, Boosting Reasoning Speed by 2.4x

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片