8月观察:趋势尚在,但高位波动与成交量同步放大需格外谨慎

Odaily星球日报2024-08-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

此处切忌被价格的大幅波动而折损心态与净值,做好下一阶段行情的准备工作是更好的选择。

加密市场二级基金 Metrics Ventures 8 月市场观察导读

1/  如笔者在 7 月月报中提到的,流动性没有明显拐点的情况下,宏观上的变化主导了场内的情绪,从降息、衰退到日元流动性收缩,引发了波动性的极速扩大。

2/  截至本月报撰写之日,市场形成了较为强势的反弹,但既定事实是在相对高位上全球美元体系风险资产普遍出现了极大的成交量和波动性,意味着筹码已然在逐步换手,后续的走势必须付诸最高的谨慎心态细细观察。

3/  从大势来看,比特币等主流币种放量回踩了年线后极速反抽,大势尚在,但以太坊走势如我们预料明显弱于其他,已然跌破上升趋势,后续仍需谨慎,但此位置无需过于看空汇率。

市场总体行情与市场走势的盘点和点评

数月的低波动行情后, 8 月初的市场给参与者始料未及的突然袭击。从 7 月初周末不再明显缩量开始,市场的波动性明显加大,这次更是在周六日便形成了带量的下跌,情绪的宣泄如水银泻地,美股市场的 VIX 飙升至 2020 年 3 月同期水平,风险资产波动率同步放大,BTC 形成了本轮周期来最大的单日成交。

这里我们主要注意到的现象是:

①随着 ETH 的汇率对再次来到下降通道下轨,大量山寨币回到了年内新低甚至是历史新低,但在市场对于山寨的情绪过于一致的悲观下,已有部分调整时间超 3 个月的山寨开始出现筑底现象、

②市场在周末的成交量再次回归,意味着波动率的收敛或许再次启动,我们可能在此处继续见证 BTC 为代表的大市值代币在扩散通道内的无序波动,但流动性不足的大背景下,上下的行情演绎将更加顺滑,分歧次数也会变少。

③市场已经超过 3 个月没有任何赚钱效应,链上的 GAS 也每日新低,我们正处于情绪、资金、热点的三重冰点,已然进入热身好时机。

整体来看,我们观测到了乐观的信号,但最重要的事情仍然是 BTC 在此处与全球风险资产共同形成的高成交高位换手,这意味着在流动性没有变化的前提下,我们必须保持谨慎的心态,在下一次出现疲软行情态势时做出保守主义的操作,上文提到的乐观信号更多是战术上的乐观主义思考,此处切忌被价格的大幅波动而折损心态与净值,做好下一阶段行情的准备工作是更好的选择。

山寨币板块

山寨币市场走势分化严重,比较混沌。某些强势山寨币行最近走出了反弹筑底,如 saga, sui, tia, sats 等,但是并未形成板块联动效应。有些依然跌破形态创造新低走势,结合场内流动性的缺失,山寨币的交易依然难度很大。建议观望为主,等趋势走出以后再介入。

İlgili Okumalar

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Market' Script

The article "When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook" discusses Solana's struggles to maintain its "internet capital markets" narrative by 2026. Despite its initial success as a high-performance "Ethereum killer," SOL's price has underperformed, dropping significantly compared to other major cryptocurrencies. Solana's vision of a global, on-chain trading network for all assets is being challenged not primarily by Ethereum, but by Hyperliquid. Hyperliquid, evolving from a perpetual contracts platform into a dedicated financial infrastructure Layer 1, has become a major beneficiary of the shift of derivatives trading from centralized exchanges to on-chain. The article argues that for high-frequency financial trading, a specialized, performance-focused chain like Hyperliquid may be more suitable than a general-purpose ecosystem like Solana. Further compounding Solana's issues was a major $200+ million exploit on its key perpetual protocol, Drift, in April, which damaged market confidence. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the protocol Phoenix as a replacement, boosting its visibility but not its trading volume, which remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters have launched a public critique of Hyperliquid's decentralization, pointing to its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics, however, note Solana's own declining validator count and centralization metrics. This strategy has also caused internal friction, with developers of other Solana protocols expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The conclusion is that Hyperliquid's rise represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that the core of a capital market might be a specialized trading engine rather than a broad ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in derivatives, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" while its grand "internet capital markets" ambition slips away.

marsbit1 saat önce

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Market' Script

marsbit1 saat önce

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

The article discusses how Solana's grand vision of becoming an "Internet Capital Markets" platform is facing significant challenges in 2026, primarily from the unexpected rise of Hyperliquid. Solana's performance has weakened, with its token SOL experiencing the largest price decline among major cryptocurrencies. Its core narrative of building a global, chain-based marketplace for all assets is under pressure both internally and externally. Hyperliquid, originally a perpetual futures exchange, has evolved into a dedicated Layer 1 financial infrastructure network. Its focused, trading-centric approach is attracting capital and challenging the assumption that a "general-purpose" ecosystem like Solana is necessary for a capital market. Hyperliquid's success suggests that for high-frequency trading, superior performance, liquidity, and user experience may be more critical than a broad application ecosystem. Internally, Solana's strategy suffered a blow from a major hack on the Drift Protocol in April, resulting in over $200 million in losses. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko has heavily promoted Phoenix as a new decentralized perpetual futures platform on Solana. While this boosted Phoenix's visibility, its trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana's community has launched a rhetorical attack against Hyperliquid, questioning its decentralization due to its limited validator set and closed-source code. Critics, however, point out Solana's own decreasing validator count and increasing centralization of stake. This focus on "decentralization metrics" has also caused internal friction, with other Solana ecosystem developers expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The article concludes that the rise of Hyperliquid represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that an efficient trading engine might be more central to a capital market than a vast ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in the derivatives space, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" rather than achieving its ambition of hosting global assets.

链捕手1 saat önce

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

链捕手1 saat önce

Samsung Bets on Mobile HBM: AI Moves from Cloud to Palm, a New Frontier in Semiconductor Investment?

Samsung is betting on bringing high-bandwidth memory (HBM) technology from servers to mobile devices, aiming to enable powerful on-device AI features in smartphones and tablets. This move is driven by the booming AI market, where HBM demand from data centers has fueled Samsung's record profits, with HBM4 already in mass production. By integrating mobile HBM, Samsung seeks to transform user AI experiences—making tasks like image generation and real-time translation faster, seamless, and more private by processing data locally. Strategically, this allows Samsung to leverage its vertical integration in memory, advanced packaging, and Exynos processors to differentiate its Galaxy devices against competitors like Apple and Qualcomm. It also opens a new consumer growth avenue, reducing reliance on volatile server HBM demand alone. The initiative is expected to benefit the broader supply chain, boosting demand for advanced packaging materials, thermal solutions, and other components. While promising, risks include potential delays in mobile HBM mass production beyond 2027, high initial costs, and the cyclical nature of the memory market. Nonetheless, Samsung's push signals a broader industry shift toward hybrid cloud-edge AI computing, positioning it as a key player in defining the future of AI-powered devices and presenting a potential long-term investment theme in semiconductors.

marsbit1 saat önce

Samsung Bets on Mobile HBM: AI Moves from Cloud to Palm, a New Frontier in Semiconductor Investment?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片