CluCoin创始人承认电汇欺诈

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-22

币界网报道:

CluCoin和CLU背后的奥斯汀·迈克尔·泰勒刚刚承认欺骗了投资者。犯罪?从ClubCoin投资者那里获得114万美元,并将其全部用于在线赌博。

据美国证券交易委员会称,泰勒在推出CluCoin时非常清楚自己在做什么。他在社交媒体上有相当不错的粉丝,所以他决定大肆宣传CLU。

如果你在加密货币领域已经呆了五分钟以上,你就知道这个过程——ICO、白皮书、整个过程。

Taylor向投资者推销了CLU的ICO会很特别的想法,甚至承诺它将以慈善为重点。人们纷纷买入,2021年5月19日,CluCoin的首次代币发行(ICO)正式上线。

在获得投资者丰厚的现金后,泰勒并没有只坚持代币。他开始谈论新的项目,比如NFT、视频游戏,甚至元宇宙平台。

但当泰勒决定在迈阿密举办一场名为“NFTCon:Into the Metaverse”的活动时,事情开始变得不明朗。整个事件于2022年4月4日和5日在一家酒店发生。

泰勒希望继续炒作,并推动对CLU和与CluCoin相关的一切进行更多投资。就在这次活动之后,事情急剧恶化。

到2022年5月,泰勒已经找到了一种方法,可以在投资者资金流动的加密货币地址获得资金。

你猜怎么着?他没有将这笔钱投入他承诺的任何项目,而是直接将约114万美元转入他的个人账户。

但不是为了任何合法的东西。然后,泰勒拿走了这笔钱,在当年5月至12月期间在多家在线赌场挥霍一空,损失了每一美元。

现在,泰勒面对音乐。他定于10月31日上午10点举行量刑听证会,美国地区法官杰奎琳·贝塞拉将决定他的命运。他正在考虑的最高刑期是在联邦监狱服刑20年。

泰勒的法律团队可能会要求宽大处理,指出他之前没有犯罪记录,甚至可能声称他沉迷于赌博。

但这并不能改变他从信任他的人那里偷钱的事实。法院还将考虑美国量刑指南,但这只是一个起点。贝塞拉法官在宣判前将权衡所有因素。

Letture associate

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

In a concentrated move over the past week, several Wall Street giants have advanced their tokenized money market fund initiatives, signaling a strategic shift driven by impending U.S. stablecoin regulations. JPMorgan Chase launched its second such fund, JLTXX, on Ethereum, explicitly targeting future stablecoin issuer reserve needs. Concurrently, Franklin Templeton partnered with Kraken to integrate its BENJI tokenized funds onto the exchange platform for use as collateral and cash management tools. BlackRock further solidified its position by filing for two new tokenized funds with the SEC, aiming to convert its massive traditional stablecoin custody business into a tokenized model. These parallel developments represent a multi-pronged institutional "compliance hunt" to capture future crypto liquidity. BlackRock and JPMorgan are focusing on the backend, preparing to serve as the core reserve and settlement infrastructure for compliant stablecoins as outlined by the GENIUS Act. This act defines strict "qualified reserve asset" requirements for stablecoin backing while prohibiting interest payments to holders. Franklin Templeton and Kraken, however, are exploiting a potential regulatory gap. By offering a tokenized fund (BENJI) that is not a stablecoin, they aim to provide yield-bearing, collateralizable digital cash instruments, circumventing GENIUS Act's ban on stablecoin yield. The impending CLARITY Act, which will delineate digital asset market structure, is seen as a complementary piece to GENIUS. Its treatment of passive income could solidify the niche for instruments like BENJI. With conservative market size estimates for tokenized money market funds reaching hundreds of billions by 2030, Wall Street institutions are positioning themselves early, using on-chain settlement as a key competitive differentiator to offer superior liquidity and composability for the next generation of dollar reserves.

marsbit1 h fa

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

marsbit1 h fa

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

In a California court, Sam Altman testified for the first time in the ongoing legal battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI. Altman made a striking claim: Musk once suggested that control of OpenAI could one day be passed down to his children. This statement reframes the long-standing conflict not as a simple governance dispute but as a foundational power struggle. Altman sought to counter the narrative that OpenAI betrayed its original non-profit, idealistic mission. He argued that from the beginning, it was Musk who sought increasing control over the organization, including a larger equity stake and ultimate decision-making authority. Altman opposed this, citing OpenAI's core principle that AGI should not be controlled by any single individual. He also addressed the key point of contention about OpenAI's shift to a for-profit structure, claiming Musk was aware of and initially supportive of exploring such a model to secure the massive funding needed for advanced AI research. Altman framed the change as a practical necessity, not a betrayal. Further testimony revealed internal concerns after Musk left OpenAI's board, with worries he might take retaliatory action. Altman critiqued Musk's management style as unsuitable for a research lab, damaging morale and culture. Throughout his testimony, Altman's focus appeared to shift from technological idealism to the realities of organizational governance and resource requirements. Regarding his brief ouster in 2023, Altman stated he seriously considered joining Microsoft but ultimately returned because OpenAI was too important to abandon.

marsbit2 h fa

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片