作者起诉Anthropic涉嫌使用盗版书籍训练人工智能聊天机器人

币界网2024-08-20 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-08-20 tarihinde güncellendi

币界网报道:

总部位于加利福尼亚州的人工智能公司Anthropic因未经许可使用受版权保护的作品来训练其人工智能聊天机器人Claude而被起诉。三位作者Andrea Bartz、Charles Graeber和Kirk Wallace Johnson于周一在加利福尼亚州的一家联邦法院提起集体诉讼。他们声称,Anthropic使用了他们书籍和其他许多书籍的盗版来开发聊天机器人。

作者的指控是,Anthropic在开发Claude的过程中,将这些作品变成了其业务的一个组成部分。因此,它声称,当Anthropic使用这些材料时,没有适当的许可,这侵犯了作者的知识产权。

作者和创作者对人工智能公司采取法律行动

该诉讼是人工智能公司在培训大型语言模型时部署受版权保护的作品所面临的一系列法庭案件的又一个补充。作者对Anthropic的索赔是摄影、新闻和音乐版权所有者向科技公司寻求法律补救的更广泛模式的一部分。这些案例围绕着在训练生成性人工智能算法的过程中对其材料的假定无约束使用。

在一个无关的案件中,其他作者作为单独的团体起诉了OpenAI和Meta Platforms,指控他们在构建自己的人工智能聊天机器人时滥用了受版权保护的作品。这些案例表明,随着越来越多的创作者和所有者希望在数字时代保护他们的知识产权,人工智能公司的活动和数据使用实践正受到越来越多的关注。

Anthropic得到了亚马逊、谷歌和前加密货币亿万富翁Sam Bankman Fried等主要金融支持者的支持,现在将不得不应对其第二起重大诉讼。这是在去年音乐出版商提交的文件之后,他们指控他们在训练同一个人工智能系统克劳德时使用了受版权保护的歌词。

作者推动人工智能公司承担法律责任

最新诉讼的作者声称,除了侵犯他们的权利外,Anthropic还通过使用他们的作品获得了巨额利润。他们表示,克劳德已经通过使用盗版书籍作为培训数据,以牺牲创作者的利益为代价,发展成为一家价值数十亿美元的企业。该诉讼要求未指明的金钱赔偿,并寻求对Anthropic的禁令,永久禁止其在未经适当同意的情况下继续使用作者的作品。

截至周二,Anthropic尚未公开回应这起诉讼。此外,代表作者的律师没有就此案发表任何补充意见。事实上,人工智能公司如何出于培训目的处理受版权保护的作品,可能取决于这一诉讼结果,这将塑造人工智能的发展和未来的知识产权格局。

İlgili Okumalar

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbit10 dk önce

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbit10 dk önce

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbit35 dk önce

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbit35 dk önce

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

The title "Building the Plank Road Openly While Secretly Crossing at Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September 'Rate Cut'?" suggests Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Walsh's hawkish stance may be a deliberate smokescreen. Academy Securities analyst Peter Tchir argues in a report that markets, currently pricing a 75% chance of a September hike, are missing a potential path to a September rate cut that Walsh himself might be quietly preparing. Tchir posits that Walsh's hawkish rhetoric aims to suppress long-term yield risks (with the 10-year Treasury yield falling recently) while creating room for a narrative shift based on upcoming data. The potential political endgame, according to this view, could be rate cuts in September and October, ahead of the midterm elections. This hinges on a political logic where the Trump administration's preference for lower rates remains unchanged. A core part of Tchir's argument involves redefining inflation metrics. He contends the Fed under Walsh may deprioritize the PCE index, criticizing its lagging components like Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER). Instead, he points to alternative, more real-time indicators like the New Tenant Repeat Rent Index (NTRR) and the Truflation daily index, which shows core inflation around 1.45%. He suggests the Fed could shift its data narrative to justify policy easing. Furthermore, Tchir downplays AI-driven inflation fears. He argues that consumer price sensitivity, evidenced by negative market reactions to price hikes (e.g., Apple), contradicts persistent inflation narratives. He also separates AI/data center spending—which he sees as relatively rate-insensitive—from broader consumer affordability issues, implying rate hikes are misdirected. Based on this analysis, Tchir sees a re-pricing of rate cut expectations as likely, creating opportunities in short-duration Treasuries. He maintains a neutral-to-slightly-bullish view on the long end of the yield curve. For equities, he recommends a significant overweight in energy (especially global nuclear assets) and, within defense/security themes, an overweight in biotech/pharma versus an underweight in semiconductors, expressing caution on AI/data center valuations.

marsbit1 saat önce

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片