Команда Symbiotic объявила о запуске основной сети для разработчиков

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2021-12-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-12

  • Команда протокола Symbiotic запустила основную сеть для разработчиков.
  • В ней доступны ключевые функции проекта.
  • Релиз публичной версии основной сети запланирован на III квартал 2024 года.
  • Проект позиционируется как аналог EigenLayer с поддержкой ERC-20.

Команда протокола рестейкинга Symbiotic объявила о запуске основной сети для разработчиков (devnet). Релиз публичного мейннета ожидается позднее в III квартале 2024 года.

SYMBIOTIC DEVNET IS LIVE

Any builder or network can now test the integration of restaking into their stack with Symbiotic’s feature-complete shared security sandbox environment. pic.twitter.com/1N3WtrxjRq

— Symbiotic (@symbioticfi) August 12, 2024

В сети уже доступны основные контракты, включая хранилище и систему обеспечения. Последняя позволяет размещать активы для повышения безопасности сторонних проектов.

Согласно релизу, полученному The Block, команда Symbiotic заявила, что это первая в истории реализация слэшинга среди протоколов рестейкинга для предупреждения возможных нарушений со стороны операторов узлов.

Разработчики отметили, что такие проекты, как Ethena, LayerZero и Bolt уже изучают возможности платформы. Она содержит модульную конструкцию и позволяет запустить рестейкинг любой комбинации активов, подчеркнули они.

«С этим релизом мы предоставляем полнофункциональную общую среду безопасности-песочницу для нашей быстрорастущей экосистемы разработчиков. Впервые команды теперь могут начать внедрять и тестировать свою логику слэшинга — огромный шаг к тому, чтобы сделать возможными многие инновационные варианты использования рестейкинга», — заявил глава экосистемы Symbiotic Феликс Латч.

Релиз публичной версии основной сети ожидается позднее в III квартале 224 года. Перед этим проект должен пройти аудит таких фирм, как Chainsecurity, Statemind, Certora, Ottersec и Zellic.

Напомним, в июле 2024 года общая заблокированная стоимость (TVL) активов в протоколе Symbiotic превысила $1 млрд.

У Incrypted есть гайд по активностям в этой экосистеме:

Непосредственно сам проект позиционируется как конкурент протокола рестейкинга EigenLayer. Ключевое отличие Symbiotic выражается в поддержке активов стандарта ERC-20.

Letture associate

Kalshi's Biggest Rival is Not Polymarket

Kalshi's CEO Tarek Mansour has identified the company's primary competitors not as the crypto-based prediction market Polymarket, but as established financial and gaming giants: CME Group, Robinhood, and DraftKings. This reflects a shift in the prediction market landscape, where the 2026 FIFA World Cup is expected to bring massive new trading volume. Traditional platforms are increasingly integrating prediction markets as a feature within their existing ecosystems. Robinhood has seen rapid growth with its prediction markets, contributing significantly to its "other transaction revenue." Similarly, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) integrates contracts from Kalshi and CME Group, while DraftKings and FanDuel (via CME) have launched their own prediction products. This allows these firms to leverage their vast user bases and infrastructure at low marginal cost, turning prediction markets from standalone apps into embedded functionalities. In response, prediction market platforms are evolving along two paths. First, they are expanding into new event categories like sports (e.g., the World Cup) and financial data to reduce reliance on election cycles. Second, they are moving towards becoming infrastructure and liquidity providers for distribution platforms. Kalshi's lead over Polymarket in trading volume is partly attributed to this channel strategy, integrating with brokers like Robinhood, Coinbase, and Webull. However, this strategy faces a challenge as distributors like Robinhood begin building their own in-house prediction market capabilities (e.g., Rothera), potentially threatening the value of pure infrastructure providers. The situation parallels historical tech battles, such as Zoom competing with Microsoft Teams and Google Meet, where embedded features in larger platforms reshape market dynamics. The future of standalone prediction market leaders like Kalshi and Polymarket will depend on their ability to navigate this new competitive landscape dominated by integrated financial and gaming titans.

链捕手3 min fa

Kalshi's Biggest Rival is Not Polymarket

链捕手3 min fa

Are the AI Giants' 'Token Subsidy Wars' Almost Over?

The article "Are AI Giants' 'Token Subsidy Wars' Nearing an End?" examines the ongoing price competition in AI token pricing, arguing that current subscription costs are heavily subsidized, with services like OpenAI and Anthropic reportedly subsidizing tokens at up to 70 times the subscription fee. Unlike past tech "subsidy wars" (e.g., ride-hailing, food delivery), AI tokens lack strong lock-in effects; users can easily switch providers if prices rise, making sustained subsidies risky. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry: giants like Google can fund subsidies with massive advertising revenue, while rivals like OpenAI and Anthropic rely on investor capital. Google Ventures founder Bill Maris suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors, especially as model capabilities converge. The article posits two potential endgames: a "winner-takes-all" monopoly scenario (like internet platforms) or a "utility" model where tokens become a low-margin, standardized commodity like electricity. Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. This implies a prolonged, profitless competition where the primary goal for companies is to stay in the game, not to achieve dominance. For users, this may mean continued access to heavily subsidized AI services for the foreseeable future.

marsbit46 min fa

Are the AI Giants' 'Token Subsidy Wars' Almost Over?

marsbit46 min fa

Trends in US Stocks (June 22): Strait of Hormuz Agreement Changes Course, Thursday's PCE and Micron to Determine Chip Sector Direction

U.S. Stock Market Outlook (June 22): Strait of Hormuz Deal Falters, Thursday's PCE & Micron to Set Chip Sector Direction. Geopolitical tensions resurged over the weekend as Iran's IRGC announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and its negotiation team walked out after threats from Trump, pausing U.S.-Iran talks. This renewed risk premium is weighing on U.S. equity futures ahead of the open. Last week's market was driven by chip stocks, with the Philly Semiconductor Index hitting a record high. While the Fed's hawkish tone was overshadowed by initial deal optimism, the S&P 500 gained 0.9% for the week. SpaceX debuted strongly but ended with two down days. Key events this week: The status of U.S.-Iran negotiations remains the immediate variable for oil and energy stocks. Monday sees Marvell and Flex added to the S&P 500. Tuesday's MSCI reclassification could benefit South Korean semiconductors and memory stocks. **Thursday, June 25th, is the critical day**, featuring the May Core PCE report and Micron's earnings. Hotter PCE data could solidify expectations for two 2024 rate hikes, while softer data would rapidly reprice rate cut bets. Micron's report is a key test for the AI narrative; the market will scrutinize its 2027 HBM supply visibility, HBM4 progress, and its position in Nvidia's Vera Rubin supply chain. Nvidia's AGM and a potential OpenAI GPT-5.6 release will make Thursday a pivotal 24 hours for AI. Friday concludes with the Russell reconstitution, elevating small-cap volatility. In summary, last week's gains face a true test. The path hinges on two concurrent threads: geopolitical developments with Iran and the AI narrative defined by Micron's guidance and Nvidia's updates. The chip sector's record highs are vulnerable if Thursday brings hot PCE data and conservative guidance from Micron. Conversely, positive outcomes could reaffirm the AI bull case, making this week's volatility a potential entry window.

marsbit1 h fa

Trends in US Stocks (June 22): Strait of Hormuz Agreement Changes Course, Thursday's PCE and Micron to Determine Chip Sector Direction

marsbit1 h fa

Viewpoint: The Impossible Triangle is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

"The Cryptography System That Can't Keep a Secret" Blockchain is a slow, expensive, shared computer owned by no one, whose only advantage is permissionless access and trustless verification. While "scalability" was solved, the true barriers to mass institutional adoption are two inherent design features: legal ambiguity and radical financial transparency. The industry found its killer app—pure ledger-based assets like money (e.g., $300B+ stablecoins)—but serves a narrow band of users. Large capital (family offices, sovereign funds) stays away because it's legally uncertain and operationally exposes every position and transaction to the public and predatory MEV, which acts as a quantifiable tax. We built a powerful cryptographic system yet failed to encrypt user activity. Privacy is not the enemy of compliance. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables proving facts (solvency, KYC, risk limits) without revealing the underlying data. This resolves the transparency vs. privacy false dilemma. "Default privacy with provable compliance" is a pure upgrade, retaining auditability for regulators while eliminating the leak. It's the bridge for the next trillion dollars of capital, finally allowing the most powerful cryptography to do what it was always meant to: keep a secret.

marsbit1 h fa

Viewpoint: The Impossible Triangle is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit1 h fa

OpenAI's "Most Open" Move: Codex No Longer Exclusively Favors GPT

OpenAI has significantly opened up its Codex programming agent by introducing a "model provider" configuration layer that allows users to connect it with various open-source models, not just its proprietary GPT. Through a configuration file or a simple `--oss` command-line flag, Codex can now route requests to local services like Ollama or LM Studio, or to third-party APIs such as Mistral or DeepSeek. This move is seen as one of OpenAI's most "open" steps, potentially lowering costs and enhancing privacy for developers who can run code generation offline. However, integration isn't seamless for all models. Codex primarily uses OpenAI's newer Responses API, while many open-source models rely on the older Chat Completions interface. This creates compatibility issues, especially for advanced features like function calling. The developer community is already building "routing" or adapter layers (e.g., CC Switch, LiteLLM) to translate between these protocols, enabling hybrid setups where GPT handles planning and open-source models handle execution. Analysts interpret this as a strategic shift for OpenAI: from competing solely on model superiority to controlling the platform and interface standards. By making Codex a flexible, pluggable entry point for AI-assisted programming, OpenAI aims to become the central hub in the developer toolchain ecosystem, even as users gain the freedom to switch underlying models.

marsbit2 h fa

OpenAI's "Most Open" Move: Codex No Longer Exclusively Favors GPT

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片