告别高估值泡沫:探索更可持续的代币发行模式

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-12

币界网报道:

作者:Ethan Luc 来源:coindesk 翻译:善欧巴,

阻碍主流区块链采用的主要因素仍然是普遍的看法,即该领域仍然过于注重投机。为了建立可持续的生态系统并吸引更多用户,协议必须从根本上重新考虑代币的分配方式。重点必须从虚高的估值和投机性价格行为转向长期效用和透明度。

今年,加密货币市场见证了代币发行的复苏,其中许多都采用了“低流通量、高完全稀释价值 (FDV)”策略。该计划很简单:以高价发行,以数十亿美元的估值领先,并围绕项目的潜力进行炒作。这种策略受到了广泛的批评,但对于许多追逐关注的项目来说,它已被证明是不可抗拒的。问题是什么?它完全是人为的。

“低浮动量、高 FDV”模式涉及将总代币供应量(浮动量)的一小部分释放到市场,同时为每个代币分配高价。这为项目创造了一个具有欺骗性的 FDV,许多代币持有者未能说明仍有待流通的剩余代币供应量。

虽然这种方法可以产生巨大的初始兴趣,但采用这种模式的许多项目看到的只是短期利益,而长期利益会逐渐瓦解。这不是一种可持续的方法,会分散所有加密项目的注意力,而这应该是真正的重点——长期实用性和协议采用。比特币花了数年时间才建立起用户群——而如今,项目只需一次大规模发布就能做到这一点。

加密货币必须做出更大胆的赌注,重新将行业重点放在分销和效用上,同时避免价格投机。

有一种更好的方法来管理代币发行——一种优先考虑长期效用和有机增长而不是投机收益的方法。协议开始尝试替代模型。例如,基于区块链的社交平台 FRIEND 以 100% 的浮动发行,从第一天起就将所有代币分发给社区。在 Lava Network 采取了截然不同的方法后,我相信行业必须采用区块链项目应如何处理代币分配和估值的新标准。

市场导向方法

通过分享区块链访问层 Lava 的经验和见解,我希望我们能够激发人们转向更负责任和可持续的代币发行实践。共同打造一个更强大、更具弹性、让所有参与者受益的区块链生态系统。

这种替代代币发行策略以通过去中心化交易所 (DEX) 交易实现的市场衍生 FDV 为中心,旨在减少投机行为并有机地培养信徒和长期网络参与者社区。通过确保更高的初始流通量和上限供应量,这种方法将重点更多地放在代币的内在效用和项目的实际潜力上,而不是投机定价。

这一策略有几个主要好处:

  1. 减少投机:有了更高的初始流通量,市场可以根据代币的效用和需求(而不是投机性炒作)更准确地为其定价。

  2. 有机增长:市场衍生的 FDV 培育出一个专注于项目长期成功和效用的社区。

  3. 透明度和信任:通过避免估值过高的陷阱,这种方法可以与社区和利益相关者建立更大的信任,确保未来的道路更加稳定和可预测。

尽管有些人可能认为市场衍生的 FDV 方法可能会导致初始增长放缓或低估的风险,但稳定、可持续的协议的长期利益远远超过这些短期担忧。

区块链领域最近的评论也强调了变革的必要性。例如,Azeem Khan 在 CoinDesk 上发表的一篇文章正确地主张,应放弃虚高的估值,以吸引散户投资者并重振 VC 代币市场。虽然这种观点承认高 FDV 的缺点,但它主要侧重于通过保持较低的估值和制造市场炒作来吸引散户投资者。

然而,这还远远不够。长期可持续的方法不应仅仅降低估值,而应创造真正的价值和效用,让散户投资者和更广泛的社区产生共鸣。重点应放在透明度、现实的估值和促进有机增长上,而不仅仅是眼前的市场兴奋。

构建可持续的区块链生态系统

区块链行业仍处于起步阶段,而如今代币发行的管理方式将决定生态系统的未来。市场衍生的 FDV 方法呼吁其他项目优先考虑透明度、长期效用和社区信任,而不是短期收益。

区块链行业正处于十字路口。继续走低流通量、高 FDV 发行的道路只会导致更多的市场不稳定和投资者的失望。通过采用市场衍生的 FDV 方法,项目可以建立更强大、更具弹性的生态系统,让所有参与者受益。现在是时候让行业专注于打造真正的产品了,而不是专注于下一个闪亮的新代币。

Letture associate

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbit41 min fa

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbit41 min fa

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbit56 min fa

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbit56 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片