以太坊价格分析:在37%的暴跌之后,以太坊的最糟糕时期是否已经过去?

币界网Published on 2024-08-11Last updated on 2024-08-11

币界网报道:

在大幅下跌37%之后,以太坊在2.1万美元支撑区附近遇到了大量购买活动,导致看涨反弹。

然而,当前的价格走势表明,ETH可能正在完成回调至2.8K美元的楔形下限,这可能预示着看跌趋势的延续。

技术分析

作者:Shayan

每日图表

仔细查看以太坊的日线图,可以发现在关键的2.1万美元支撑位附近出现了强烈的看涨反应,导致价格迅速飙升。这一走势表明需求强劲,约为2万美元,投资者对较低的价格表现出兴趣,反映了他们对以太坊长期潜力的信心。

然而,ETH现在遇到了一个相当大的阻力位,其中包括之前突破的楔形下限和关键的2.8K美元阈值。

该区域可能会阻止上涨势头并引发逆转,标志着有效回调至突破水平。如果发生这种情况,以太坊的下一个目标可能是心理和决定性的2K美元支撑位。

来源:TradingView

4小时图表

在4小时图上,加密货币在2K美元的重要支撑位附近显示出复苏的迹象,导致小幅回调。

然而,价格现在已经达到了一个临界阻力区,以0.5和0.618斐波那契水平为界。预计该区域将面临更大的抛售压力,并可能是当前调整运动的主要目标。

鉴于这种阻力,ETH似乎可能面临该地区的拒绝,可能会继续其对2K美元支撑的看跌趋势。然而,如果出现意外的看涨突破,价格可能会经历强劲飙升,旨在夺回楔形的下限和关键的2.8万美元大关。

来源:TradingView

链上分析

作者:Shayan

以太坊最近经历了大幅下跌,导致投资者猜测看跌趋势是否会继续。然而,期货市场数据表明,逆转可能即将到来。

提供的图表突出了以太坊的长期清算,衡量长期永久头寸的清算情况。在牛市中,随着期货市场的稳定和现货购买压力的接管,重大清算事件后通常会出现价格反弹。

最近的级联引发了大规模的长期清算,达到了自2022年11月以来从未见过的水平。这种大规模的清算级联可能表明期货市场降温,许多杠杆头寸已被清空。

随着期货市场的潜在重置,如果需求恢复,以太坊可能会在长期内再次出现冲动的牛市。

来源:CryptoQuant

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片