市场复苏 、ETH有望达到 3,000 美元

币界网Published on 2024-08-07Last updated on 2024-08-07

币界网报道:

以太坊价格有望重新测试 3,000 美元,每周以太坊 ETF 流入量转为正值

v2-02cd9c19b90b01c34502c7533ee69ec0_720w.webp

以太坊 ETF 已从周一的大幅下跌中反弹,尽管市场存在不确定性,但流入量仍转为正值。周二以太坊价格的回升表明看涨趋势正在形成,以太坊能否在 8 月达到 3,000 美元?

以太坊 ETF 每周流入量达 4900 万美元

在加密货币市场下滑期间,ETH 的网络活动十分活跃。以太坊的价格飙升超过 3%,达到每日最高 2,547 美元。截至发稿时,ETH 的交易价格为 2,521 美元,以太坊也受益于整体市场趋势。山寨币的市值已恢复至3000 亿美元,加密货币的交易价格为 2,500 美元及以上。尽管市场复苏,但投资者仍继续购买现货以太币交易所交易基金 [ETF],流入资金达 4,900 万美元。自 7 月推出以来表现惨淡的 ETH ETF 现已重回正轨,周一净流入量达到 4900 万美元。这比上周五的 5430 万美元总净流入量有了显著改善。

v2-06e7420e27730b473b9a7896381af6b1_720w.webp

对于 ETF 来说,继续获得正向资金流入至关重要,这将提振投资者士气并增加对 ETH 的需求,从而支持可持续的上升趋势。

在这其中,一个名为“7 Siblings”的团体利用最近的下跌,在此时购买了大量 ETH 代币。根据 Lookonchain 的数据,该实体当时秘密购买了 56,093 个 ETH,成本为 1.293 亿美元。根据区块链数据,7 Siblings 昨天以约 2,600 美元的价格开始囤积以太坊,并一直购买,直到价格跌至 2,191 美元。购买 56,093 个 ETH 的平均成本为 2,305 美元。

v2-76357b9982c229b596457f2b78f9e34f_720w.webp

累积狂潮持续了12个小时。该钱包利用Uniswap和1inch等多个平台将价值1.293亿美元的USDC[USDC]兑换成ETH。

以太坊价格突破 2,500 美元,下一步将如何?

在成功守住 2,100 美元的支撑位后,交易员,投资者和一些团体开始买入,推动ETH 价格反弹。资金流量指数 (MFI) 从超卖转入中性区域证实了这一势头转变,推动以太坊价格突破 2,500 美元。每日收盘价必须高于 2,500 美元,才能验证看涨论点至 3,000 美元,此时多头将决定稍事休息,然后再继续推高至 3,500 美元。

v2-ffa1f4c4579c448e903c92a80a78b106_720w.webp

IOMAP 模型显示在 2,292 美元至 2,368 美元之间有着强劲支撑,众多投资者押注持续上涨。目前阻力位正在下降,可能会持续上涨超过 3,000 美元。

v2-55d2780e1241362281f61abb791ca811_720w.webp

先前的ETH 价格预测证实,每日时间范围内的死亡交叉模式可能会使多头的情况复杂化,阻碍进一步上涨至 2,500 美元以上。随着在阻力位上挣扎可能会经历一段长期的盘整,因为它在任何上行走势中都会遇到巨大阻力。

简单来说

随着多头和空头的较量,以太坊网络受到近期下跌的严重影响。不过以太坊 ETF 实现每周净流入 4900 万美元,引发复苏希望。 目前ETH 维持在 2,292 美元至 2,368 美元之间的关键支撑位上方,说明前景看涨。期货未平仓合约增加,交易量也在支持以太币的上涨。

目前经济衰退担忧有所减弱,在市场复苏的情况下 ETH 有复苏上涨的希望,机构团队大量囤积也说明其对 ETH 的兴趣高涨和看好, ETH ETF 的正向流入提振了市场情绪为价格回升至3000美元提供了助力,我认为随着上述因素与以太坊 ETF 流入量转为正值,预计以太坊价格会持续上涨,有望重新测试 3,000 美元并进一步突破。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit1h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片