TAO 现最强反弹,盘点子网 12 个有用的 AI 项目

深潮Published on 2024-08-07Last updated on 2024-08-07

Bittensor 上新增了12个子网,且每个子网都在一定程度上促进着 AI 相关的开发。

撰文:深潮 TechFlow

加密市场在经历了本周的“黑色星期一”后血流成河,但一天过后不同板块的代币均迎来反弹。

在这之中,最靓的仔要数 Bittensor (TAO)。

Coinmarketcap 数据显示,昨日市值前100代币中,Bittensor (TAO) 涨23.08%,位居反弹榜首位。

虽然AI叙事并没有年初那般火热,但游资的选择也代表着对板块头部项目的看好。

不过之前 Bittensor 也遭受了一定程度的 fud,社区认为项目名过其实,子网当中也并没有什么实际应用。

(相关阅读:FUD 风声鹤唳,AI 新王 Bittensor 会跌下神坛吗?

加密项目有没有用虽然并不与代币价格直接相关,但 Bittensor 就真的只是个空壳子么?

过去几个月,Bittensor 上新增了12个子网,且每个子网都在一定程度上促进着 AI 相关的开发,其中说不定也会跑出新的 Alpha 项目。

我们盘了盘这些新子网,在注意力都集中在 TAO 价格反弹的同时,一览其基本面的变化。

子网 38:Sylliba,支持70+语言的文本语音翻译工具

开发团队:Agent Artificial

简介:

Sylliba 是一个翻译应用程序,支持文本和语音的翻译,可以处理70多种语言。

值得一提的是,该程序可以为链上AI代理所用:

  • 自动化翻译流程:AI代理可以自动调用这个服务,实现跨语言的信息处理和通信。

  • 增强AI能力:使得不具备多语言能力的AI系统也能处理多语言任务。

  • 翻译请求和结果可以在区块链上验证,增加了系统的可信度。

  • 激励机制:通过代币经济,可以激励高质量的翻译服务提供者。

项目地址:https://github.com/agent-artificial/sylliba-subnet

子网 34:Bitmind,检测区分真实内容与虚假合成内容

开发团队:@BitMindAI

简介:

BitMind专注于开发去中心化的深度伪造检测技术。随着生成式 AI 模型的快速发展,区分高质量合成媒体和真实内容变得越来越复杂。

BitMind的 Subnet通过在 Bittensor 网络中部署强大的检测机制来解决此问题,使用生成式和判别式 AI 模型来有效识别深度伪造。

同时,BitMind API 使得能够利用子网的深度伪造检测功能来开发强大的消费者应用程序。具有图像上传界面的BitMind Web 应用程序可以使用 API 帮助用户快速识别图片是真还是假的可能性,从而提供易于访问且易于解释的反欺骗工具。

子网 43:Graphite,智能路径规划网络

开发团队:@GraphiteSubnet

简介:

Graphite是一个专门设计用于处理图形问题的子网,特别关注旅行商问题(TSP)。TSP是一个经典的优化问题,目标是找到访问一组城市并返回起点的最短可能路线。

Graphite利用Bittensor的去中心化机器学习网络来高效地连接矿工,以处理TSP和类似图形问题的计算需求。

目前,验证者生成合成请求并发送给网络中的矿工。矿工负责使用他们设计的算法解决TSP,并将结果发送回验证者进行评估。

子网 42:Gen42,GitHub 的开源AI编码助手

开发团队:@RizzoValidator@FrankRizz07

简介:

Gen42利用Bittensor网络提供去中心化的代码生成服务。他们的重点是创建强大、可扩展的工具,用于基于代码的问答和代码补全,这些工具由开源大型语言模型驱动。

主要产品:

a. 聊天应用:提供一个聊天前端,允许用户与他们的子网进行交互。这个应用的主要功能是基于代码的问答。

b. 代码补全:提供一个兼容OpenAI的API,可以与continue.dev一起使用。

矿工和验证者参与的方式详见项目 Github

子网 41:Sportstensor, 体育预测模型

开发团队:@sportstensor

简介:

Sportstensor 是一个致力于开发去中心化体育预测算法的项目,由 Bittensor 网络提供支持。

项目在开源的 HuggingFace 上提供基础模型供矿工训练和改进,同时能够基于历史和实时数据进行战略规划和性能分析,并奖励全面的数据集收集和高性能预测模型开发。

矿工和验证者功能:

  • 矿工:接收验证者的请求,访问相关数据,使用机器学习模型进行预测。

  • 验证者:收集矿工的预测,与实际结果比较,记录验证结果。

子网 29:coldint,小众AI模型训练

开发者:暂未发现,官网在此

简介:

SN29 coldint,全称为 Collective Distributed Incentivized Training(集体分布式激励训练)。

目标:专注于小众模型(niche models)的预训练。"小众模型"可能指的是那些不像大型通用模型那样广泛应用,但在特定领域或任务中非常有价值的模型。

矿工和其他角色参与及分工:

a) 矿工主要通过公开共享训练模型来获得激励。

b) 次要激励给予那些通过贡献代码库来分享见解的矿工或其他贡献者。

c) 通过奖励小的改进,鼓励矿工定期分享他们改进的工作。

d) 高度奖励能够将个人训练努力结合成更好的组合模型的代码贡献。

子网 40: Chunking,优化RAG(Retrieval-Augmented Generation,检索增强生成)应用的数据集

开发团队:@vectorchatai

代币:$CHAT

简介:

SN40 Chunking 就像是一个非常聪明的图书管理员,具体的做法是把大量的信息(文字、图片、声音等)分成小块。这样做是为了让AI更容易理解和使用这些信息。如果书架整理得很好,你就能很快找到。

SN40 Chunking就是在帮AI "整理书架"。

不仅仅是文字,SN40 Chunking还能处理图片、声音等多种类型的信息。这就像一个全能的图书管理员,不仅管理书籍,还管理照片集、音乐CD等。

子网 39: EdgeMaxxing,优化AI模型以在消费者设备上运行

开发团队:@WOMBO

简介:SN39 EdgeMaxxing是一个专注于优化消费者设备AI模型的子网,从智能手机到笔记本电脑。

EdgeMaxxing子网采用了一种竞争性的奖励系统,每天都会进行一次竞赛。目的是鼓励参与者不断优化AI模型在消费者设备上的性能。

参与者角色和分工:

矿工(Miners):

主要任务是提交经过优化的AI模型检查点

他们使用各种算法和工具来提高模型性能

验证者(Validators):

必须在指定的目标硬件上运行(例如NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090),每天收集所有矿工提交的模型,对每个提交的模型进行基准测试,与基线检查点比较;根据速度改进、准确性维持和整体效率提升来评分,并选出当天表现最佳的模型作为获胜者

项目开源仓库:https://github.com/womboai/edge-maxxing

子网 30: Bettensor,去中心化体育预测市场

开发团队:@Bettensor

简介:

Bettensor允许体育爱好者预测体育比赛的结果,创建一个基于区块链的去中心化体育预测市场。

参与者角色:

Miner:负责生成预测结果

Validator:验证预测结果的准确性

数据收集器:从各种来源收集体育赛事数据

项目开源仓库:https://github.com/Bettensor/bettensor (看起来仍在开发中)

子网 06:Infinite Games,通用预测市场

开发团队:@Playinfgames

简介:

Infinite Games 开发实时和预测性工具,用于预测市场。同时项目对@Polymarket和@azuroprotocol等平台的事件进行套利和聚合。

激励系统:

使用$TAO代币作为激励手段

奖励准确预测和有价值信息的提供者

总体上,项目鼓励用户参与预测和信息提供,形成一个活跃的预测社区。

子网 37:LLM Fine-tuning,大语言模型微调

开发团队:Taoverse & @MacrocosmosAI

简介:

这是一个专注于大语言模型(LLMs)微调的子网:奖励矿工(miners)对LLMs进行微调,使用来自子网18的持续合成数据流进行模型评估。

工作机制:

  • 矿工训练模型并定期发布到Hugging Face平台。

  • 验证者(validators)从Hugging Face下载模型并使用合成数据持续评估。

  • 评估结果记录在wandb平台上。

  • 根据权重分配TAO代币奖励给矿工和验证者。

项目仓库地址:https://github.com/macrocosm-os/finetuning

子网 21:Any to Any,创建先进的AI多模态模型

开发团队:@omegalabsai

简介:

"Any to Any"在这个项目中指的是一种多模态AI系统的能力,它可以在不同类型的数据或信息之间进行转换和理解,例如文本到图像,图像到文本,音频到视频,视频到文本。

系统不仅可以进行转换,还能够理解不同模态之间的关系。比如,它可以理解一段文字描述和一张图片之间的关联,或者一段视频和相应的音频之间的联系。

在这个子网中,激励机制被用来鼓励全球的AI研究者和开发者参与项目。具体来说:

  • 贡献者可以通过提供有价值的模型、数据或计算资源来获得代币奖励。

  • 这种直接的经济激励使得高质量的AI研究和开发成为可持续的事业。

项目仓库地址:https://github.com/omegalabsinc/omegalabs-anytoany-bittensor

补充知识:

以防一部分读者不知道 Bittensor 子网的意义,一个简单的解释可以是:

  • 子网是 Bittensor 生态系统中的专门网络,

  • 每个子网专注于特定的 AI 或机器学习任务。

  • 子网允许开发者创建和部署特定用途的 AI 模型。

  • 它们通过加密经济学来激励参与者提供计算资源和改进模型。

 

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit4h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片