市场波动中值得关注的关键支撑位

0x资讯Published on 2024-08-06Last updated on 2024-08-06

  • XRP 在市场波动中表现出韧性,预计可能进一步下跌至 40.7 美元至 46.9 美元之间。
  • Solana 已下跌 43.2%,接近回调的尾声;潜在买入区间为 93 美元至 107 美元。
  • XRP 的 RSI 为 37.97,表明价格可能出现逆转,而 SOL 的 RSI 为 38.71,表明继续面临下行压力。

加密货币市场经历了显著的波动,尤其影响了 Ripple (XRP) 和 Solana (SOL)。在更广泛的市场动荡中,XRP 表现出韧性,而 Solana 则举步维艰,揭示了这两种资产之间截然不同的表现模式。

正如分析公司 Cheeky 加密货币在一份报告中强调的那样, Youtube 视频 Ripple 的 XRP 最近面临巨大的抛售压力,其价格在币安单日K线走势图上跌至 43.1 美元的低点。使用斐波那契尺度来衡量这种下跌趋势,专家预测可能会进一步下跌,可能跌至 40.7 美元至 46.9 美元之间。

尽管面临这些挑战,XRP 仍表现出相对于比特币和更广泛的加密货币市场的卓越能力,而加密货币市场一直在经历大幅抛售。

然而,日线图上的阻力位表明短期反弹可能有限。200 小时 EMA 可能预示着潜在的上涨空间,但由于市场目前的状况,XRP 的走势仍不确定。

而 Solana 则面临不同的轨迹。在大幅下跌 43.2% 之后,SOL 已经打破了之前的市场结构,表明其正在经历一次严重的调整。

尽管该代币可能已接近修正阶段的尾声,但尚未达到预期范围。 Solana 的潜在买入机会可能在 93 美元至 107 美元之间。 尽管面临挑战,但 Solana 的长期前景仍然乐观,有望复苏和增长。

过去一段时间,XRP 的表现呈现温和的上涨趋势,峰值达到 12% 左右。与 SOL 相比,该代币的波动性相对较低,而 SOL 的走势更为激进。

XRP 的价格仍高于 5% 的支撑位,并在 12% 左右遇到阻力。相比之下,Solana 的峰值已超过 20%,其支撑位在 15% 左右,阻力位在 20%。Solana 的波动性较高,可能会吸引寻求可观收益的短期交易者,而 Ripple 的稳定表现可能会吸引更保守的投资者。

XRP 与 SOL 1 天价格K线走势图,来源: CoinMarketCap

目前 XRP 的交易价格为 0.499863美元,24 小时交易量为 2,622,671,934 美元,反映出过去 24 小时内增长了 12.15%。相比之下,SOL 的价格为 139.03美元,交易量为8,912,432,505美元,较同期增长22.40%。

XRP/USD 1 天价格K线走势图,来源: 交易观点

XRP 的 1 天 RSI 读数为 37.97,表明价格存在反转的可能性,而其 MACD 低于信号线表明短期内有下行势头。

Solana/USD 1 天价格K线走势图,来源: 交易观点

SOL 的 1 天 RSI 为 38.71,也表明超卖状况,类似的 MACD 模式表明进一步的下行压力。

声明:以上内容采集自COINEDITION,作品版权归原创作者所有.

Related Reads

Financing Weekly Report | 11 Public Financing Events, Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Company Trace Finance Completes $32 Million Series A Round Led by CoinFund

Financing Weekly Report | 11 public funding events recorded, with a total scale exceeding $264 million. The stablecoin payment infrastructure sector remains a hot spot. Key Deals: - Trace Finance, a stablecoin payment infrastructure firm, raised $32 million in a Series A round led by CoinFund to expand in Latin America and Asia-Pacific. - Galaxy Ventures co-led a $140 million Series A round for Karta, a US credit card provider for global travelers without requiring an SSN. - Instant payment platform Interchecks completed a $50 million Series C round. - Paradigm led a $9 million Series A for Latin American cross-border payment app El Dorado. - Range, a stablecoin compliance startup, raised $8.3 million in an oversubscribed Series A. - RWA infrastructure project Renaiss raised $1.5 million to expand its on-chain collectibles platform. Sector Breakdown: - Infrastructure & Tools: 6 deals, including the above-mentioned Trace Finance, Range, and Renaiss. - Centralized Finance (CeFi): 3 deals, led by Karta's $140 million round. - DeFi: 1 deal – reinsurance protocol Re secured strategic investment from Coinbase Ventures. - Prediction Markets: 1 deal – K25.ai completed a $10 million Pre-A round from NewGen. Other notable transactions include digital asset depository RDC raising $7 million, ad-tech startup EarnOS securing $6 million, and a $1 million strategic investment in LitVM, a ZK Layer 2 for Litecoin. The report highlights sustained investor interest in stablecoin payment infrastructure, compliant on-chain finance, and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.

marsbit39m ago

Financing Weekly Report | 11 Public Financing Events, Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure Company Trace Finance Completes $32 Million Series A Round Led by CoinFund

marsbit39m ago

When Transfers Become Truly Frictionless: How Sui Uses 'Zero Gas' to Become the Underlying Infrastructure for Stablecoin Payments

Title: Sui Launches Zero-Gas Stablecoin Transfers to Become the Foundation for Stablecoin Payments Sui has introduced a zero-gas fee feature for peer-to-peer stablecoin transfers, eliminating the need for users or businesses to hold separate SUI tokens to pay transaction costs. This innovation, built on a new underlying account architecture called Address Balances, significantly reduces validator processing costs for eligible transactions. Currently, the feature applies to a whitelist of stablecoins for transfers meeting a minimum amount, effectively preventing spam. This development aims to unlock mainstream payment use cases for stablecoins—such as everyday purchases, remittances, and subscriptions—by removing cost and complexity barriers. It is also positioned to benefit high-frequency micro-payments for AI agents and institutional B2B payments, reducing operational friction. Major custody provider Fireblocks has already announced support. The move follows Sui processing over $1 trillion in stablecoin transfer volume since August 2025. Looking ahead, Sui plans to enhance this infrastructure with protocol-level confidential transactions later in 2026, aiming to provide scalable, free, and privacy-preserving payments. Together, these advancements strengthen Sui's goal of becoming the default settlement layer for stablecoin payments.

marsbit41m ago

When Transfers Become Truly Frictionless: How Sui Uses 'Zero Gas' to Become the Underlying Infrastructure for Stablecoin Payments

marsbit41m ago

Ethereum Is Retracing the Path of the Internet and Linux: No One Yields, and the Neutral Party Ultimately Prevails

This article argues that Ethereum is following the historical path of open, neutral systems like the Internet and Linux, which eventually triumphed over proprietary, centrally-controlled alternatives. Major financial institutions like JPMorgan, Stripe, and Circle are building their own proprietary blockchains or networks (e.g., Tempo, Arc), but will never agree to build on a competitor's controlled infrastructure. This creates the perfect opportunity for Ethereum as the only neutral, credibly neutral settlement layer that no single entity controls. The piece draws parallels to the 1990s, when experts like Bill Gates predicted proprietary networks (from Microsoft, Oracle) would win over the open Internet, and when Sun Microsystems' Unix lost to the open-source "bazaar" development model of Linux. This model, described in Eric Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar," thrives on permissionless innovation where countless contributors improve the system, outpacing any centralized competitor. Ethereum embodies this through its decentralized development, broad validator distribution, and credible neutrality—rules that are transparent, equally applied, hard to change, and open to all. This has attracted over a million developers and major institutions like Coinbase, BlackRock, and JPMorgan, who choose Ethereum for its security, ecosystem, and sovereignty (the inability of any single party to change the rules). While proprietary chains offer initial speed and control, they inherit the downsides of both centralization and decentralization without the long-term innovation benefits. The article concludes that, just as open systems historically win, Ethereum is poised to become the foundational, neutral settlement layer for global finance.

marsbit51m ago

Ethereum Is Retracing the Path of the Internet and Linux: No One Yields, and the Neutral Party Ultimately Prevails

marsbit51m ago

Kalshi's Biggest Rival is Not Polymarket

Kalshi's CEO Tarek Mansour has identified the company's primary competitors not as the crypto-based prediction market Polymarket, but as established financial and gaming giants: CME Group, Robinhood, and DraftKings. This reflects a shift in the prediction market landscape, where the 2026 FIFA World Cup is expected to bring massive new trading volume. Traditional platforms are increasingly integrating prediction markets as a feature within their existing ecosystems. Robinhood has seen rapid growth with its prediction markets, contributing significantly to its "other transaction revenue." Similarly, Interactive Brokers (IBKR) integrates contracts from Kalshi and CME Group, while DraftKings and FanDuel (via CME) have launched their own prediction products. This allows these firms to leverage their vast user bases and infrastructure at low marginal cost, turning prediction markets from standalone apps into embedded functionalities. In response, prediction market platforms are evolving along two paths. First, they are expanding into new event categories like sports (e.g., the World Cup) and financial data to reduce reliance on election cycles. Second, they are moving towards becoming infrastructure and liquidity providers for distribution platforms. Kalshi's lead over Polymarket in trading volume is partly attributed to this channel strategy, integrating with brokers like Robinhood, Coinbase, and Webull. However, this strategy faces a challenge as distributors like Robinhood begin building their own in-house prediction market capabilities (e.g., Rothera), potentially threatening the value of pure infrastructure providers. The situation parallels historical tech battles, such as Zoom competing with Microsoft Teams and Google Meet, where embedded features in larger platforms reshape market dynamics. The future of standalone prediction market leaders like Kalshi and Polymarket will depend on their ability to navigate this new competitive landscape dominated by integrated financial and gaming titans.

链捕手58m ago

Kalshi's Biggest Rival is Not Polymarket

链捕手58m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片