残酷警钟敲响,市场反转仍取决于宏观条件和ETF流入

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-08-05Last updated on 2024-08-05

Abstract

我们的赌场并不足够吸引新一波的散户 degens。

原文作者:Ignas | DeFi

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

对于在 3 月 BTC 创下新高后对山寨币持乐观态度的任何人来说,这都是一次残酷的觉醒。

我也过于乐观,期待 BTC 转向 ETH,随后山寨币也会随之上涨。

结果并未如我所愿。ETH 表现滞后,大多数山寨币只有短暂的反弹,随后就大幅下跌。

我的策略相对保守,专注于将 L1 代币作为“生产性资产”进行质押——你可以质押它们并用来获取其生态系统的空投代币。

我的策略是将空投代币卖回 L1 代币,这应该会推动 L1 代币的价格上涨(就像美元印刷推动主要股票的价格一样)。

我相信 $ETH 会表现优于其他加密资产,因为它在加密货币中是最具生产力的资产,尤其是通过重新质押获得的高收益空投。

确实,像 ETHFI 和 REZ 这样的空投代币发行了数百万美元的价值,EIGEN 和其他 LRT 治理代币也即将推出。

尽管这些高收益机会依然存在,ETH 却未能引发 FOMO(害怕错过)。

每个人可能已经过度投资,在熊市期间大量购买了 ETH 和 BTC。

尽管如此,所有积极使用 ETH 进行收益获取的人,可能都比 ETH 的现货价格表现得更好。

而且随着 $EIGEN 解锁,更多资金即将涌入。这方面没有太大的遗憾。

SOL 生态系统最初表现良好,$JTO 和 $JUP 的成功确实推动了 $SOL 价格,因为 FOMO 开始出现。

然后 $W 空投表现一般,但随后的每一次空投奖励都急剧下降($TNSR、$PRCL$DRIFT),其中 $CLOUD 的表现最令人失望(相对于预期)。

现在,Solana 是一个 meme 币的游乐场,但创新的 DePin 和 DeFi 协议在 meme 币热潮消退时正等待他们的时机。

比特币生态系统在 BRC 20 和 NFT 的推动下,最初表现良好——我们仅通过持有“蓝筹”NFT 就获得了多个空投。但随后 Runes 上线,一切都急剧下滑。

我相信,一旦基础设施,特别是 DEX 得到改善,Runes 将会反弹。

其他 L1/L2 生态系统的表现更差。

  • Injective 的去中心化应用质量欠佳,空投也不值得一提。

  • Starknet 的 $STRK 空投失败,未能在生态系统中产生“财富效应”。尽管 DeFi 春季奖励很高,但协议空投却令人失望。

  • SEI 在 NFT 方面表现出色,但 DeFi 去中心化应用和空投的表现却不尽如人意。

  • SUI 的生态系统拥有高质量的去中心化应用,但空投不够慷慨,而 SUI 的解锁对价格造成了沉重负担。

  • Cosmos 生态系统遭遇内部争斗,空投已经枯竭,他们必须从最近的攻击中恢复过来。

  • Arweave 社区期待 $AR 持有者能获得更高的 $AO 配额,但实际上只得到了 36% 。

接下来将会发生什么?

  • Stacks 将 Nakamoto 升级推迟到 8 月底,希望多个空投和更快的区块时间能带来一些 FOMO。

  • 仍在等待 $EIGEN 交易启动,以及第二次空投和 Swell、Kelp、Puffer 代币的推出。

  • 多个 Eigenlayer AVS 正在构建,并为代币推出做好准备(希望能为重新质押者提供慷慨的空投)。

  • Symbiotic 和 Karak 正在挑战 Eigenlayer,并可能在市场条件改善时尝试抢先推出 EIGEN。

  • Fantom 迁移到 Sonic 将测试“重命名”新代币是否能为“旧”代币带来兴奋。

  • 当/如果 meme 币热潮消退,DeFi OG 代币是否会反弹,或许是因为 degens 对低流动性、高 FDV 代币感到厌倦?

最终,这些内部催化剂取决于有利的宏观条件和 ETF 流入——我们的赌场并不足够吸引新一波的散户 degens。

但如果市场反弹,DeFi degens 的玩法需要重新评估,重点关注那些继续建设并慷慨回馈用户的最具创新性的生态系统。

你在押注哪个生态系统呢?

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

Wall Street Questions the AI Narrative of Tech Giants Wall Street is shifting its focus from the hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) to a rigorous financial reality check. Following strong earnings reports from companies like Google and a massive $500 billion financing initiative from Nvidia for AI infrastructure, the market reaction has been mixed and skeptical. The core concern revolves around the massive capital expenditure (CapEx) required for AI development—building data centers and acquiring chips—and whether future cash flows can justify these upfront costs. Investors are now scrutinizing free cash flow (FCF), which measures the cash left after operational expenses and capital investments. A negative FCF, as seen recently with Alphabet (Google's parent company), signals heavy immediate spending, even if profits are growing. The divergent stock reactions highlight this new scrutiny. Microsoft's stock surged after its earnings, supported by strong operating cash flow, growing cloud revenue (Azure), and a large backlog of committed business. In contrast, Alphabet's stock fell despite profit growth because its capital spending caused FCF to turn negative for the first time. Similarly, Nvidia's announcement of a $500 billion financing platform, while potentially expanding its market, raised questions about whether AI build-out has become too expensive for tech companies to fund internally. Analysts are moving beyond simply asking if there is AI demand—which cloud revenue growth confirms—to deeper questions: the speed at which AI investments translate into revenue, profit, and ultimately, cash returns. The market is evaluating the "return on invested capital" (ROIC) over the long term, considering factors like rapid chip obsolescence, energy costs, and future competition. In summary, Wall Street's AI narrative is evolving from grand vision to a detailed financial and operational examination. The key question is no longer if AI is transformative, but whether companies can generate cash returns fast enough to outpace the immense costs of building it. Free cash flow has become a critical first filter in this reassessment.

marsbit55m ago

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

marsbit55m ago

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

In the spring of 2026, Elon Musk unveiled the TeraFab chip manufacturing plan, aiming to meet the immense computing power needs of SpaceX and Tesla. He subsequently signaled a move into the photolithography machine market, with speculation centering on a Free Electron Laser (FEL) approach to challenge the dominance of traditional EUV technology. Currently, ASML, utilizing Laser-Produced Plasma (LPP) EUV光源, holds a near-monopoly. However, LPP faces bottlenecks in energy conversion efficiency, tin debris contamination, and a power ceiling. In contrast, FEL technology, pursued by companies like xLight (where former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger serves as executive chairman), offers a different path. It generates EUV light by accelerating electrons, potentially providing higher power without plasma conversion and its associated contamination, targeting the sub-13.5nm "beyond-EUV" wavelength range. The photolithography landscape shows three main trajectories: ASML's incremental evolution (like High-NA EUV),光源革新 like FEL targeting ASML's core component, and non-EUV alternatives like Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) or Electron Beam Lithography (EBL). While ASML remains the dominant player with strong financials and产能 expansion plans, new entrants are challenging the status quo. xLight claims its FEL could boost productivity by 50-100%. Other paths include Substrate's particle-accelerator-based X-ray lithography and Chinese research into LPP alternatives. Musk's TeraFab is a high-stakes bet that FEL can move from lab to fab, that "plug-and-play"光源 replacement can circumvent ASML's ecosystem, and that massive future compute demand justifies a new supply chain. His public endorsement of FEL signifies that the photolithography business is no longer ASML's game alone.

marsbit55m ago

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

marsbit55m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片