加密货币崩盘、暴跌、闪电崩盘的背后发生了什么 风暴何时能结束

币界网Pubblicato 2024-08-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-08-05

币界网报道:

亚洲盘初,加密货币市场大幅下跌,据 CoinGecko 统计,加密货币总市值下跌 12.5%,目前约为 1.97 万亿美元。

v2-092346c468ea8aaf9b0b33a21ff0499a_720w.webp

这是自 2 月中旬以来市值首次跌破 2 万亿美元大关。比特币跌破 60,000 美元大关,以太坊跌至六个月低点,山寨币创下熊市新低。这种急剧下跌是多种因素共同作用的结果,形成了一场完美的市场困境风暴。

发生了什么?

经济衰退

由于经济指标显示可能出现衰退,投资者变得更加谨慎,导致包括加密货币在内的各种资产类别遭到抛售。萨姆规则衰退指标已超过 0.50 的门槛,从历史上看,这预示着美国经济开始衰退。并且是在 8 月和 9 月,这两个月对加密货币来说历来都是糟糕的月份。尽管Coinbase 报告了正收益,但零售活动与 2021 年相比仍大幅下降。这种下降引发了人们对是否真正处于牛市的质疑。比特币的主导地位继续上升,表明大盘并不像比特币那样看涨。

关键因素

政治发展:哈里斯的选票超过特朗普,引发了加密货币投资者的恐慌。

地缘政治紧张局势:地缘政治紧张局势也十分严重,冲突升级影响投资者情绪。随着地缘政治问题升级,它们给加密货币市场带来了更多挑战,进一步影响其稳定性。

经济数据:劳动力市场数据不佳,降息呼声高涨,引发衰退担忧。许多人将此与加密货币低迷或预计 9 月份的严重崩盘联系起来。

Genesis 偿还债务:破产的加密货币贷款机构 Genesis 完成了重组,目前正在向债权人偿还三年的债务,该机构现已开始向债权人立即分配约 40 亿美元的加密货币和法定货币,并已经转移了其中 15 亿美元的加密货币。

近期宏观经济形势:日本央行上周意外的鹰派立场,加上美联储谨慎降息,进一步加剧了市场的不确定性。

上涨受阻 新鲜多头:近期加密货币价格的飙升导致许多新投资者进入市场,希望继续获利。但随着市场的逆转,这些新仓位面临清算,加剧了下跌势头,并加剧了当前市场的不稳定。

ETH 疲软的原因

美国现货以太坊 ETF市场出现大量资金从加密产品流出。根据 SoSoValue 的数据,过去一周共有 1.6935 亿美元从 ETH 交易所交易基金流出。这一数字仍代表着以太坊现货基金的大量流出,但比首周的流出量低了 50%以上。在首周,ETH ETF 市场净流出超过 3.41 亿美元。

造成这一规模资金流出的主要基金是灰度以太坊信托基金,该基金在过去两周内已流出超过 21 亿美元。ETHE 在推出的一周内净流出超过 15 亿美元。

Jump Trading 也做出了贡献,抛售了 5 亿美元的以太坊,从 ETF 上市两天后开始,一直持续到周末。以太坊正在接近关键支撑位,CME 缺口高达 63,000 美元,可能预示着潜在的反弹。

投降阶段

市场目前处于投降阶段,类似与过去的低迷时期,并预计以太坊 ETF等事件将推动市场复苏。建议关注比特币的主导地位,并将当前时期视为买入机会。投降通常预示着市场即将触底,而山寨币投资的切入点非常有利可图。

市场反应

随着抛售套现潮近尾声,期待币市在8 月重拾升势。由于季节性规律,加密货币市场在8 月通常会出现交投情绪萎靡转冷、主流币种价格暴跌等情形。以2023 年8 月为例,当月的比特币现货交易量较同年6 月骤降19%;比特币期货交易量同期锐减30% 。过去5 年来,比特币在 8 月的平均跌幅为2.8%,流动性、交易量的下滑可能是导致8 月市场波动性加剧的主因。我们今年可能也会见到类似的低迷态势。

值得关注

可以更多的关注比特币和以太坊 ETF 的正向流动,这会提振市场,推动市场飙升。如果黄金创下新高且美元/收益率下降,市场可能会随之反弹。市场的大幅调整可能即将结束,关键支撑位和指标暗示着可能的逆转。

简单来说

加密货币市场明显疲软,币市8 月面临季节性疲态。目前大幅下跌归咎于近期宏观经济发展,尤其是美联储不愿降息等。并且由于季节规律导致 8、9月份市场可能会呈现低迷态势。

相较于短期内市场上可能出现的剧烈波动,我认为还是要尽量选择长择视角,长期持有并专注于基本面良好的项目通常是一种更为稳妥的投资策略。抄底还是要等确认稳住了,再进场是最稳妥的。先苟活着,最起码未来还有希望。没有一直涨的市场,相反也没有一直跌的市场。

Letture associate

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

**Missing the 20x Opportunity: A Simple 'Dumb' Approach to AI Investing** The AI boom, driving NVIDIA's revenue from $60B to $216B in two years, creates immense investment pressure. However, like the internet bubble of 2000, the largest AI opportunities likely lie ahead, perhaps after a correction. Instead of rushing in now or waiting paralyzed for a crash, the author proposes a third way: building a "knowledge warehouse" by systematically mapping the AI industry to be ready when opportunities arise. The core of the strategy is understanding AI's four-layer value chain: 1. **Compute Infrastructure (The "Engine"):** This foundational layer, where all money eventually flows, includes: a) **Chip Design:** NVIDIA's dominance via its CUDA ecosystem, b) **Chip Manufacturing/Packaging/Memory:** TSMC's near-monopoly in advanced manufacturing and SK Hynix's lead in High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), c) **Optical Interconnects:** Essential for large-scale AI clusters (e.g., Lumentum, Coherent), d) **Cooling & Power:** Critical for high-density AI data centers (e.g., Vertiv), e) **Servers/Data Centers & Cloud Platforms:** The physical and virtual wholesale providers. 2. **Models & Tools (The "OS"):** The competitive layer of foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI), now generating real revenue. A key shift is the center of gravity moving from **Training** models to **Inference** (running models), which demands different chip characteristics and could challenge NVIDIA's monopoly. 3. **Middleware & Platform ("The Glue"):** Connects models and applications (e.g., Scale AI, Hugging Face). This layer could explode if applications take off. 4. **Vertical Applications ("The Cash Register"):** Where AI meets end-users (e.g., enterprise AI, coding tools, medical AI, robotics). A critical cross-cutting constraint is **Energy**, as AI's massive power consumption drives investment in nuclear and other energy infrastructure. The author identifies four key questions for further research: 1) How will the shift from Training to Inference reshape the competitive landscape? 2) With tech giants spending over $600B on capex, where is the ROI from AI applications? 3) What are the under-the-radar opportunities in the "second" and "third" circles of the value chain (e.g., cooling, specialty foundries)? 4) How will geopolitics (e.g., U.S.-China chip restrictions) bifurcate the supply chain? The conclusion is that missed opportunities stem from insufficient research, not slow timing. By methodically studying each layer—its business models, competition, and valuations—investors can build the "killer intuition" needed to act decisively when the market presents its chance.

marsbit16 min fa

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

marsbit16 min fa

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

"Rented Conviction: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Is Real Money" The weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs are often interpreted as a gauge of institutional belief. However, a significant portion of this activity is driven by a hidden arbitrage trade, not directional conviction. The core mechanism is a cash-and-carry arbitrage: traders buy spot Bitcoin (often via ETFs) while simultaneously shorting CME futures to lock in the price difference, or "basis." This delta-neutral trade is essentially an interest rate play. In weekly data, about half the fluctuation in ETF flows can be explained by new short positions added by leveraged funds (hedge funds), with a correlation of 0.70. Bitcoin's price movement in a given week shows no statistical power in predicting these flows. While this arbitrage trade drives weekly *volatility*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows, the current net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The remainder is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week, which constitutes the vast majority of the accumulated "mountain" over two years. Thus, ETF flow data overstates the *volatility* of conviction, not its *level*. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for nearly two years. Leveraged fund short positions peaked at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and have since declined to ~$4.5 billion. When the basis compresses to unprofitable levels, ETF inflows and short positions retreat together. Recent outflows should not be mistaken for a loss of faith but rather the routine unwinding of this rate trade. For Ethereum ETFs, the pattern is weaker. Accounting for staking yield makes the basis often negative, so neither strong conviction buying nor robust arbitrage supports its flows. To interpret ETF flows correctly, monitor the CME basis versus T-bill rates and leveraged fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the next "demand" headline is real. The real, patient buy-and-hold demand is what constitutes the enduring bulk of ETF assets.

marsbit1 h fa

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片