提案公司MyFoundedFX在实施两周后撤销了“一致性规则”

币界网Published on 2024-07-20Last updated on 2024-07-20

币界网报道:

总部位于美国的自营交易公司MyFundedFX在客户群的广泛反对下,突然取消了最近实施的一致性规则。该规定仅生效两周,旨在阻止高风险交易策略,但遭到了交易员的强烈批评。

MyFundedFX在交易员反弹后推翻了有争议的一致性规则

2024年7月3日,MyFoundedFX首席执行官Matthew Leech宣布为资金账户引入50%的一致性准则。该规则规定,在资金阶段的单个交易日,交易者的利润不得超过50%。虽然这不是一种可违反的罪行,但它要求交易者在达到50%的阈值之前继续交易,然后才能提取利润。

Leech两周前评论道:“未来的最终变化就在这里。截至目前,我们正在对所有资金账户实施50%的一致性指导方针。”。“这完全是为了禁止和阻止个人最大限度地利用单笔交易,并鼓励多日一致的支付。”

然而,贸易界的反应绝大多数是负面的。交易员认为,该规定不公平地限制了某些交易风格和策略,可能会阻碍他们利用市场机会的能力。

针对这种强烈反对,利奇昨天(星期六)发表声明,推翻了这一决定。

利奇承认:“在过去的几周里,我看到了关于一致性规则的反馈,并理解你的沮丧,因为它限制了特定的交易风格与其他交易风格的成功。”。“在重新评估这些变化后,我们决定调整我们的方法,在今天下班前采取以下行动。”

首席执行官宣布了三项关键变化:

    已删除所有新帐户和现有帐户的一致性规则。资金账户的支出频率正在恢复到之前的计划。杠杆率正在所有平台和阶段进行调整,以与受监管的差价合约杠杆率保持一致。在金融交易中,杠杆是由经纪商提供的贷款,它使交易者能够以更少的初始投资控制相对大量的资金。因此,与没有杠杆的交易相比,杠杆允许交易者获得更高的投资回报。交易员试图从股票和货币等金融市场的波动中获利。没有任何杠杆的交易会大大降低潜在的回报,因此交易者在金融交易中,杠杆是经纪人提供的贷款,它使交易者能够以更少的初始投资控制相对大量的资金。因此,与没有杠杆的交易相比,杠杆允许交易者获得更高的投资回报。交易员试图从股票和货币等金融市场的波动中获利。没有任何杠杆的交易将大大降低潜在的回报,因此交易者请阅读本条款要求。

Leech解释说,这些变化旨在减少资金账户中的全有或全无交易行为,遵守最近获得的许可要求,并阻止恶意交易行为。他还指出,杠杆率的降低预计将提高挑战阶段的通过率,同时促进资金账户更一致的交易。

有未平仓头寸的交易员被指示在公告当天美国中部时间下午3:00之前平掉所有头寸,以促进这些变化的实施。交易将从周日晚上开盘后恢复正常。

这种快速逆转突显了自营交易公司必须在风险管理和风险管理之间保持微妙的平衡。风险管理是经纪商使用的最常见术语之一,指的是提前识别潜在风险的做法。最常见的是,这还涉及风险分析和采取预防措施,以减轻和预防此类风险。鉴于在面临不可预见的事件或危机时可能产生的后果,这些努力对金融业的经纪人和场所至关重要。鉴于几乎所有资产类别都受到更严格的监管,风险管理是经纪人最常用的术语之一,指的是提前识别潜在风险的做法。最常见的是,这还涉及风险分析和采取预防措施,以减轻和预防此类风险。鉴于在面临不可预见的事件或危机时可能产生的后果,这些努力对金融业的经纪人和场所至关重要。鉴于几乎所有资产类别都面临更严格的监管环境,请阅读本条款和交易者满意度。它还强调了集体交易员反馈在制定行业政策方面的力量。

如果你想详细了解MyFoundedFX的产品,你可以查看Finance Magnates对美国四家支柱公司的审查。我们还与Leech的公司一起比较了E8 Markets、Earn2Trade和Smart Prop Trader。

MyFundedFX是2024年2月首批暂停接受美国新客户的公司之一,原因是涉及流行MetaTrader平台MetaQuotes许可证的监管危机。然而,仅仅两周后,由于与蓝莓市场的合作,MT平台又回到了这家受欢迎的道具公司的产品中。

Related Reads

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

Gold is experiencing its strongest rally since 1979, with prices reaching a record high near $5,600 per ounce in January. This surge is driven primarily by central banks, not retail investors. In 2025, central banks net purchased 863 tonnes of gold, with a similar increase expected in 2026. Traditional gold investment methods—physical bullion and ETFs—present trade-offs like storage issues, limited access, or management fees. Tokenized gold emerges as a third option: digital tokens representing ownership of physical bars stored in professional vaults. These tokens are globally transferable in seconds, divisible, and redeemable for physical metal. The potential impact mirrors that of dollar stablecoins. Stablecoins digitized the dollar, enabling cheap, instant, global transfers and driving adoption from $27 billion in 2020 to over $3 trillion today. Similarly, tokenized gold solves gold's "form problem"—its lack of divisibility, portability, and accessibility. Adoption is accelerating. In Q1 2026, tokenized gold trading volume hit $90.7 billion, surpassing the $84.6 billion for all of 2025. Its market cap exceeded $6 billion, growing 5.5 times faster than physical gold holdings in the quarter. While concerns about counterparty risk exist, tokenized gold represents a direct claim on allocated bars, with major issuers providing regular attestation reports. Just as stablecoins placed dollars on a digital, global rail, tokenized gold now offers a more practical form for this ancient asset, potentially expanding access to billions.

marsbit8m ago

Gold Price Achieves Strongest Rally in 46 Years, Tokenized Gold Trading Volume Already Exceeds Full-Year 2025

marsbit8m ago

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

Japanese borrowing costs have hit their highest levels since 1996, with yields on 30-year bonds reaching 4.185%. This marks a significant shift for a country long reliant on negative rates. Concurrently, Bitcoin surged 22% past $80,000, seemingly decoupled from the bond market turmoil. Historically, the massive yen carry trade has fueled global risk assets, predicated on near-zero Japanese rates. This assumption is now challenged. A potential rate hike by the Bank of Japan in September could strengthen the yen, forcing carry trade unwinds and potentially triggering a global deleveraging event, as seen in August 2024 when Bitcoin fell sharply. Conversely, if the yen weakens further, Bitcoin could attract Japanese investors as a hedge against currency depreciation and the country's massive debt burden. Institutional adoption in Japan is growing, with regulatory changes paving the way for potential crypto ETFs by 2027. The key variable is the BoJ's September policy signal. If it hints at a rapid tightening cycle to combat inflation and support the yen, risk assets like Bitcoin may face selling pressure from carry trade liquidation. However, if debt sustainability concerns limit its hawkishness, leading to a weaker yen, Bitcoin could benefit. Currently, the market is betting on a slow-motion debt crisis, not a sudden collapse. While Bitcoin shows resilience, its fate remains tied to the direction of the yen and the scale of any carry trade unwind.

marsbit11m ago

Japanese Rates Return to 1996 Levels, Can Bitcoin Withstand the September Rate Hike?

marsbit11m ago

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

"Bitcoin's Quantum Defense: A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes" by the Blockstream Research Team explores how Bitcoin can transition to quantum-resistant digital signatures, as current schemes like Schnorr and ECDSA are vulnerable to quantum computers. The report evaluates three lattice-based signature candidates—Dilithium, Falcon, and Hawk—against criteria like on-chain cost (key/signature size), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and support for Bitcoin's key derivation standard (BIP-32). The analysis recommends a minimum Security Level 3 for Bitcoin due to its long-term security needs. Dilithium (ML-DSA) is praised for its simplicity and integer-only operations, making it easier to implement securely, but it has the largest signature size (~5.3 KB for Level 3). Falcon (FN-DSA) offers the most compact signatures (e.g., ~3.1 KB for Level 5) and the fastest verification, though its signing requires complex floating-point sampling—a solvable engineering challenge. Hawk, despite its small size, was withdrawn from NIST standardization after a security vulnerability was discovered, highlighting the importance of conservative security margins. Currently, neither Dilithium nor Falcon has a fully viable, production-ready BIP-32 key derivation method. The report concludes that if a lattice-based scheme had to be chosen now, Falcon-1024 would be the preferred option for its balance of size, speed, and mature security assumptions. However, the short-term recommendation remains hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) for their lower risk, with a potential future hybrid or full transition to Falcon once its standard (FN-DSA) is finalized and well-supported.

marsbit13m ago

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparison of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbit13m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片