不再PVP,Jupiter创始人呼吁搭建PPP型互助社区

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-06-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-06-27

Introduzione

如果都互相「蚕食」而不是互相「培育」,那么很快就没有什么人可「吞食」了。

原文作者:Meow, Jupiter 联合创始人

原文编译:Felix, PANews

Jupiter 联合创始人 Meow 近日发文表示,为了加密行业长久发展,呼吁加密参与者构建 PPP(互助)型加密社区。什么是 PPP,为何 Meow 认为 PPP 型社区如此重要?以下为文章全文。

在这轮周期中,最重要的事情之一是将加密货币从 PVP 思维模式转变为 PPP 思维模式。

区别:

  • PPP(玩家帮助玩家)社区希望最后一个进入的玩家也能获益

  • PVP(玩家对战)社区希望最后一个进入的玩家是他们获利的“窗口”

根据概念可知,PPP 是无限游戏,而 PVP 被默认为带有明确终点的有限游戏,最后接盘的是失败者。

但为什么 PVP 型如此盛行,以至于大多数局外人甚至许多业内人士都认为加密货币从根本上说是一种 PVP 游戏?

这是因为 PVP 型“社区”非常容易形成。所有成员达成的共识是,吸引更多的人购买他们持有的代币,才会变得更富有(多亏了魔幻的代币发行模式),所以他们应该做更多的事情(“传销”代币)。

相比之下,PPP 型社区的形成非常困难,因为社区的重点不能放在吸引其他人加入并希望抛弃他们,而是要拥有更多的盟友,共同构建一个共同的长期未来。

也就是说,加密货币的未来肯定是 PPP 型,因为即使 99.999% 的新“社区”是 PVP 型,但那些持续繁荣的社区肯定都是 PPP 型。

像 BTC、ETH、SOL(希望还有 JUP)这样伟大社区的特点是,致力于帮助每一位新进入网络的人获益,而不是把他们当成一堆接盘侠。

PPP 型最终会取得胜利,因为:

  • 加密领域最好的思维方式,结合了共同愿景和盈利的本质

  • 既不愤世嫉俗,也不妄想,兼具理想主义和实用主义

  • 加密行业发展的唯一途径,因为没有哪个社区能在内部蚕食的情况下幸存

然而如今,加密货币作为 PVP 型行业声名狼藉,公众的看法通常是贪婪的投机分子创造和推销“神奇”的互联网货币,为了让人接盘可以说出任何话。

这种看法的核心问题是,即使是最认真的加密 builder 也经常认为,这种看法有一定道理。

我们能做的就是主动拒绝 PVP 型社区,将你的时间、精力和能量投入到培养 PPP 型社区中的真正关系和专业知识上,而不是在 PVP 型社区中短暂的“人吃人”。

如果我们都互相“蚕食”而不是互相“培育”,那么很快就没有什么人可“吞食”了(和当下市场情况类似,新人少、新资金少)。

加密领域可能是一个完全没有限制选择的行业,个人可以选择任何类型游戏模式和任何社区。

但建议选择 PPP 模式。

原文链接

Letture associate

IOSG: U.S. Bonds, AI, and Inflation Can't All Be Had. Which Side Should BTC Bet On?

**Title: IOSG: Can't Have It All – Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation. Where Should BTC Bet?** **Core Thesis:** Washington is likely to prioritize stabilizing the Treasury market and sustaining the AI investment cycle, accepting higher inflation for longer as the trade-off. This creates sustained tailwinds for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from private balance sheets. **Key Issue:** The critical macro price is no longer the Fed funds rate, but the yield investors demand to hold long-term US Treasuries. Recent surges in 10-year and 30-year yields stem from a combination of persistent inflation risks, heavy fiscal supply, thinning demand for duration, and new competition for capital from massive AI infrastructure investments. **The Trilemma:** The US faces a difficult choice between controlling inflation, maintaining Treasury market stability, and fostering the AI growth cycle. Political pressure suggests inflation control is the most likely sacrifice. **Treasury's Response:** Measures by Treasury Secretary Besant focus on defending the bond market: supporting the Yen to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales, increasing long-end liquidity via repos (effectively shortening government debt maturity), and a potential shift toward more short-term bill issuance. This could generate significant liquidity, reigniting "currency debasement" trades. **Gold's Role:** Gold's ~90% surge since mid-2024 is not just an inflation hedge but a bet on monetary debasement as a politically viable path out of the debt cycle, driven by declining dollar trust. **Bitcoin's Positioning:** Bitcoin has historically failed to correlate with gold during "debasement" rallies. However, its recent strong performance alongside Treasury's liquidity actions suggests the market may be treating it as a "stealth QE" trade—a scenario where crypto assets typically thrive amid expanding global liquidity. For BTC to firmly join the "debasement hedge" category, this correlation needs to persist. **Conclusion & Risks:** The framework suggests that preserving market stability and the AI cycle will likely mean shorter debt maturity,常态化 liquidity backstops, and tolerance for higher inflation—favorable for gold and BTC. This outlook would be undermined if inflation falls toward 2%, a credible fiscal path emerges, AI becomes self-funding, or private demand absorbs debt without higher term premiums. The key question is which corner of the trilemma breaks first; accelerated "duration transfer" by the Treasury would mean a longer tailwind for Bitcoin.

marsbit15 min fa

IOSG: U.S. Bonds, AI, and Inflation Can't All Be Had. Which Side Should BTC Bet On?

marsbit15 min fa

How 5G Will Be Launched in Russia: The Digital Ministry's Proposal and the Roadmap to 2035

Russia's Ministry of Digital Development has proposed a plan for launching 5G networks. It allows the "Big Four" mobile operators (Beeline, Megafon, MTS, T2) to deploy 5G on existing 4G/LTE base stations and frequencies, and will allocate them the new 4.63–4.99 GHz band. A key element is "technological neutrality," permitting the use of foreign equipment until September 2026. The new 4.63–4.99 GHz band is intended for more advanced services and industrial applications. However, a phased transition to Russian-made base stations will begin in 2027, with a target of at least 50% domestic equipment by 2030. The rollout timeline aims for 5G in cities with over 1 million people by the end of 2027, expanding to 84 cities by 2035. Initial "5G Ready" service, operating over existing infrastructure, will offer minimal speed improvements. Significant speed gains (4-10x over LTE) will require the new band and corresponding equipment. The plan addresses long-standing regulatory delays, including the military's hold on the global standard 3.4–3.8 GHz band. This forced Russia to adopt the 4.63–4.99 GHz range, overlapping with a Chinese band, making Chinese equipment a potential transitional solution. The success of the rollout will depend on equipment supply and the pace of production localization, while a challenge lies in smartphone compatibility with this non-standard frequency band.

cryptonews.ru2 h fa

How 5G Will Be Launched in Russia: The Digital Ministry's Proposal and the Roadmap to 2035

cryptonews.ru2 h fa

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Announces a Colossal $700 Billion Allocation! How Will This Affect Bitcoin?

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas warns that the growing adoption of tokenized deposits in the banking sector could pose unforeseen risks to the financial system. Tokenized deposits, which transfer traditional bank deposits to blockchain infrastructure, offer features like instant settlement and programmable payments. While issued by regulated banks and maintaining deposit characteristics, they could enable customers to move funds between banks much faster in search of higher yields. This would significantly weaken banks' liquidity management and lending capacity. The Fed's analysis estimates that an increase in deposit interest rate sensitivity by 10% could reduce the interest rate risk banks can bear by approximately $700 billion over ten years. Similarly, a 10% shortening of the average deposit maturity could reduce the banking system's capacity to convert deposits into loans by about $580 billion. This acceleration of deposit movement could force banks to rely on more expensive wholesale funding, increasing borrowing costs for consumers and businesses and potentially making traditional banks resemble non-bank financial institutions. While the report does not directly address Bitcoin, the described shifts could have long-term implications. Firstly, the tokenization of deposits by banks could promote institutional adoption of blockchain-based financial infrastructure, indirectly legitimizing digital asset classes like Bitcoin. Secondly, faster-moving deposits and resulting higher funding costs could increase the price of liquidity in the financial system. This could create near-term headwinds for risk assets, including Bitcoin, due to tighter financial conditions and potential selling pressure. The report concludes that widespread adoption of this technology could impact many areas, from payment systems to monetary policy transmission mechanisms.

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Announces a Colossal $700 Billion Allocation! How Will This Affect Bitcoin?

cryptonews.ru3 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片