AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-04-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-04-02

Introduzione

AssangeDAO的初始目标是光明磊落的，但近期的大额资金转移引发了许多质疑。

原文作者：Lisa，慢雾科技

2024 年 3 月 10 日，被标记为 Censored: Clock Multisig 的地址 (0x5DAEA26517788b1c0DDB0200c6Fa6d8248076143) 将 100 ETH 转移到新地址，这一操作再次引发了社区的关注和不满。因为这个地址与去中心化自治组织 AssangeDAO 直接相关，社区内的一些成员对其潜在的「Soft Rug Pull」行为表示怀疑。（Ps. 本文由慢雾 SlowMist 和 RescuETH 救援联合出品）

AssangeDAO 是什么

自成立之初，AssangeDAO 就因其与具有深度争议性的个人 —— Julian Assange 的关系而备受瞩目。Julian Assange 于 2006 年创办了维基解密 (WikiLeaks)， 2010 年，他因揭露涉及美国政府的各类争议事件而被关押在伦敦的一处监狱。2021 年 12 月 10 日，英国高等法院作出允许引渡 Julian Assange 的决定，这意味着他可能在美国被判处长达 175 年的监禁。在这一判决落地的当天，以 Assange 的名字命名的 AssangeDAO 在一个 Telegram 群组中成立。群组成立后不久，Assange 的弟弟加布里埃尔·希普顿也加入其中，为争取 Assange 的释放进行积极抗议和游说。

2022 年 2 月 3 日，AssangeDAO 效仿被许多主流媒体关注报道的 ConstitutionDAO(PEOPLE)，在众筹募资平台 JuiceBox 发起募捐。根据其官网介绍，AssangeDAO 是一个「密码朋克」组织，成员包括阿桑奇家族成员，唯一目的是将 Assange 从监禁中解救出来。AssangeDAO 号称要筹集资金来竞拍 Assange 和数字艺术家 Pak 创作的联名「Censored」系列 NFT，这系列 NFT 名为「Clock 1/1 」，是一个静音的时钟，记录着 Assange 在监狱里度过的日子。据了解，该 NFT 由 Pak 在专门的网站上拍卖，从 NFT 出售中获得的收益将用于 Assange 的法律辩护和宣传活动，以提高人们对其案件言论自由的认识。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

与 PEOPLE 类似，人们每捐献 1 枚 ETH 可获得 100 万枚治理代币 JUSTICE，由于此前 PEOPLE 治理代币上涨数十倍，让捐助者获益颇丰，因此这次募捐，吸引了大量投资者，并获得 JUSTICE 代币作为回报，这些代币可用于对未来的 DAO 提案进行投票。促使这一募捐更加引人注目的是， 2 月份以太坊创始人 Vitalik Buterin 给该项目捐赠了 10 ETH。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

2022 年 2 月 7 日，AssangeDAO 的第一轮筹款活动告一段落，他们筹集了超过 10, 500 枚 ETH 的资金。接着，他们迅速地展开了第二轮筹款活动，截止目前，总筹款已经达到了 17, 422 枚 ETH，超过了 ConstitutionDAO 的 11, 613 枚 ETH，成为 JuiceBox 历史上筹款最多的 DAO。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

MistTrack 链上追踪

根据 RescuETH 提供的相关数据，AssangeDAO 的多签地址 (0x5DAEA26517788b1c0DDB0200c6Fa6d8248076143) 于 2022 年 3 月共收到约 16, 600 ETH，目前这个多签地址还剩下 5, 018.59 ETH，两年时间转移了近 12, 000 ETH。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

我们使用反洗钱追踪平台 MistTrack 进行分析， 2022 年 4 月 8 日，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 转移 580.745 ETH 到合约地址 (0x eD 2 … 131)，再分散转移到多个地址。其中 151 ETH 停留在两个地址，暂未转出。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

2022 年 5 月 9 日，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 转移 34.99 ETH 到 Kraken 地址 (0x 158 …D 11)。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

2022 年 5 月 9 日，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 转移 829.64 ETH 到合约地址 (0x 8 a 1 … 262)，接着通过四个地址的转移，最终将 500 ETH 转到 (0x323339bc28028da8cd11b584747ee8ec873616b4)。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

2022 年 5 月 11 日，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 转移 124 ETH 到 Coinbase 地址 (0x 9 Ff…FE 2)。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

值得注意的是，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 在以上的交易中，都会在转出大额资产前发送 0.01 ETH 到目标地址进行测试。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

2022 年 6 月 3 日，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 转移 50 ETH 到地址 (0x323339bc28028da8cd11b584747ee8ec873616b4)。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

2022 年 6 月 8 日 — 2024 年 2 月 16 日，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 每过半个月左右会转出 150 ETH 到不同的地址，已转出 65 笔，共 9750 ETH。其中大部分都转到地址 (0x323339bc28028da8cd11b584747ee8ec873616b4)；而从 2024 年 1 月 23 日开始，最后两笔 150 ETH 最终都转到地址 (0x2f988a4f26280a108a5761a889e63bd7f91d517e)。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

2024 年 3 月 6 日和 3 月 10 日，该多签地址 (0x 5 DA… 143) 将 200 ETH 分为两笔转移到地址 (0x2f988a4f26280a108a5761a889e63bd7f91d517e)。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

经过上述分析，可以看出最终资金汇集到两个地址：

0x323339bc28028da8cd11b584747ee8ec873616b4

0x2f988a4f26280a108a5761a889e63bd7f91d517e

继续分析地址 (0x 323 … 6 b 4)：

首笔交易在 2020 年 10 月；
在 2022 年 3 月 — 2023 年 11 月之间，共转出 17, 517 ETH 到 Kraken 平台；
在 2023 年 12 月转出 337.5992 ETH 到另一汇集地址 (0x2f988a4f26280a108a5761a889e63bd7f91d517e)。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

而地址 (0x2f9…17e) 首笔交易在 2023 年 7 月，其在 2023 年 12 月 — 2024 年 3 月之间转出 1, 250 ETH 到两个 Kraken 地址。

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

目前，资金转移及余额情况如下：

AssangeDAO资金转移引发疑问：高调募捐背后潜在的Rug Pull

总结

就 AssangeDAO 这个事件，虽然其初始目标是光明磊落的，但近期的大额资金转移引发了许多质疑，特别是资金最后汇集的地址，如有兴趣可使用反洗钱追踪平台 MistTrack(https://dashboard.misttrack.io/) 对相关资金自行监控。

AssangeDAO 背后的真实意图，我们无法得知，等待该组织对此的官方解释或者更多的信息披露。同时，投资者也应有风险意识，在投资任何项目前都须对其进行细致的研究和评估，对于涉及去中心化自治组织 (DAO) 的投资特别要谨慎，因为这类项目的透明度和执行力存在一定的挑战。任何承诺过高的回报、资金流向不明或转账频繁等情况都应该引起我们的警惕，这些可能是某些风险行为的预警信号，切勿盲目追求高收益而忽视潜在风险。

Letture associate

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

The Glamsterdam upgrade, scheduled for late 2026, is a major Ethereum hard fork combining the Amsterdam execution layer and Glasgow consensus layer updates. Its primary goal is not simply increasing throughput but restructuring Ethereum's block production, validation, and resource pricing to enable future scaling. Key technical changes include **EIP-7732 (ePBS)**, which formally enshrines proposer-builder separation into the protocol. This decouples consensus and execution tasks, extending the execution payload propagation window to ~9 seconds. This provides more time for node verification, allowing for safer increases in block capacity (Gas limit) in the future. Another core component is **EIP-7928 (Block-Level Access Lists - BAL)**. It mandates a list of all state accessed within a block, moving this feature from an optional transaction-level (EIP-2930) to a mandatory block-level requirement. This explicit access list enables client optimizations like parallel disk reads and state root computations, paving the way for parallel execution. To manage long-term state growth, **EIP-8037** increases the cost of creating new state (e.g., accounts, storage slots), separating the pricing of permanent database bloat from temporary computation. This allows execution capacity to scale more aggressively without causing state size to explode proportionally. The planned upgrade bundle includes around 10 EIPs categorized into: 1) Core protocol restructuring (ePBS, BAL), 2) Resource pricing adjustments (state costs, calldata costs), and 3) EVM/developer improvements. Several other EIPs, including those potentially improving staker exit liquidity (EIP-8061, EIP-8080), are under consideration. The technical development coincides with significant personnel changes within the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol team. The Foundation's official communications frame this as part of a broader shift towards a "coalition of organizations" working on the Ethereum roadmap, citing new entities like ethlabs and the Ethereum Economic Zone. In summary, Glamsterdam represents a foundational re-engineering of Ethereum's block pipeline and economic model—focusing on ePBS, BAL, and multi-dimensional resource pricing—to prepare the network for sustainable, high-throughput scaling in the years ahead.

Foresight News4 min fa

Ethereum's Next Stop Glamsterdam: The Core Upgrades You Must Know

Foresight News4 min fa

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

"Ethereum Foundation Splits? Understanding Ethlabs and Its 'Bright Future'" Former Ethereum Foundation members Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma have announced the launch of Ethlabs, an independent non-profit research and development lab. Announced on June 22nd, the initiative comes amidst discussions about the need for new organizational structures within the Ethereum ecosystem, a point highlighted by Bankless founder David Hoffman. Ethlabs' mission is to establish Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer for the global economy. The organization positions itself as a bridge connecting frontline developers, applications, and user needs with the core protocol. It aims to translate real-world demands into protocol improvements, industry standards, and deployable products. The founding team brings significant expertise: Dietrichs and Monnot are highly cited researchers in areas like Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) and MEV, while Schwarz-Schilling, Rudolf, and Ma contribute backgrounds in economic modeling, consensus research, and applied cryptography. Initial supporters include BitMine, a major corporate ETH treasury; Sharplink, another treasury firm; and Consensys founder Joe Lubin in a personal capacity. Community backers include figures like Uniswap's Hayden Adams and Base's Jesse Pollak. The timing coincides with internal Ethereum Foundation discussions about "spinout" projects. While Ethlabs and the Foundation share research interests like MEV mitigation, Ethlabs frames its role not as a competitor but as part of a shift from a "single-core coordination model" to a "multi-R&D entity collaboration model." It views Ethereum as a public project belonging to all builders, with Ethlabs as one node in a broader governance network. Ultimately, Ethlabs represents an organizational evolution within the maturing Ethereum ecosystem. The key question is whether multiple research bodies can collaborate effectively to advance Ethereum as a competitive global settlement infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报7 min fa

The Ethereum Foundation Has Split?! An In-depth Look at Ethlabs' "Bright Future"

Odaily星球日报7 min fa

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

"A Short Seller's Dire Prediction: AI Boom Fading, US Stocks to Peak by Q3 with 30-50% Decline" Prominent macro investors Jeffrey Gundlach and Felix Zulauf warn that the AI-driven market rally is nearing its end, forecasting a major US stock market correction of 30-50%, potentially beginning as early as Q3. Their analysis points to alarming parallels with historical market tops, citing extreme concentration in the top AI-related stocks within the S&P 500. Zulauf's bearish thesis hinges on unsustainable capital expenditure trends among major cloud companies, negative free cash flow emergence, and soaring semiconductor prices. Gundlach highlights dangerous parallels to the 1999 tech bubble peak. A key divergence from conventional wisdom is Gundlach's view that long-term Treasury yields will not fall meaningfully even during a recession, due to America's structurally out-of-control fiscal deficits and soaring interest costs. He warns this could force the government into yield curve control or even a sovereign debt restructuring. Both investors express severe concerns about the opaque private credit market, drawing parallels to the pre-2008 financial crisis environment. They allege widespread rating inflation, misrepresented credit quality, liquidity illusions, and fraudulent asset valuations within this sector. The analysis links the AI boom and private credit crisis through financing costs. They argue that as AI companies' cash flows weaken and they seek funding, a high and sticky long-term interest rate environment will severely stress lower-rated corporate borrowers, exposing cracks in credit markets. Finally, they predict a regime shift where the US dollar weakens and US equities underperform global markets, marking the end of their long dominance. The stage is set for a significant market reversal.

marsbit15 min fa

'Bear' Doomsday Prophecy: AI 'Reaching Its Peak', U.S. Stocks to Top Out Fastest in Q3, Down 30-50%

marsbit15 min fa

Why Does No One Buy DeFi Insurance?

**Title: Why Isn't DeFi Insurance Being Bought?** DeFi insurance, which promised automated, unbiased payouts via smart contracts, has failed to gain traction. The core issue is economic: high premiums severely erode the yields that attract users to DeFi in the first place. For example, insuring a USDC deposit on Aave V3 could cost 1.5–2.5% of the annual yield, leaving a net return barely above a savings account. For riskier platforms like Maple Finance or Ethena, premiums can even turn net yields negative. Consequently, users often forgo insurance, as it nullifies their profit motive. The market also suffers from structural flaws. First, DeFi risks are highly correlated (e.g., an oracle failure can impact multiple protocols simultaneously), unlike the independent risks in traditional insurance. This makes large-scale events potentially catastrophic for insurers. Second, the total capital in DeFi insurance pools (e.g., Nexus Mutual's ~$81.5M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive capacity gap. A single major hack could drain the entire industry's reserves. Furthermore, the governance model where tokenholders vote on claims creates a conflict of interest, incentivizing them to deny payouts to protect their own funds. As a result, the sector is shrinking. While pioneers like Nexus Mutual are pivoting to preventative measures (bug bounties) and seeking external capital via reinsurance, the fundamental problems remain. DeFi insurance represents a public good—its stability benefits the entire ecosystem—but without a mechanism to share costs, a "tragedy of the commons" ensues where no one is willing to pay, leaving the system vulnerable.

marsbit29 min fa

marsbit29 min fa

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

SpaceX's share price (SPCX) has fallen sharply, briefly dropping below its $150 IPO price in pre-market trading. The decline follows a catastrophic explosion during a Starship static fire test and was exacerbated by the company's announcement of a planned $20 billion bond issuance. This move, coming soon after its IPO raised $85.7 billion, raised concerns about SpaceX's cash burn rate and AI infrastructure spending surpassing expectations. The sell-off is also tied to a broader global pullback in AI-related stocks, with investors questioning the return on massive capital expenditures. Analysts note the initial IPO surge was largely driven by retail investor frenzy, which has now waned as sentiment turns cautious. With only about 5% of shares currently floating, the market is bracing for significant potential selling pressure when employee lock-up periods expire later this year. While some, like Cathie Wood's ARK Invest, remain long-term bullish on SpaceX's core ventures, other research firms argue the current stock price is driven by narrative rather than fundamentals and that future growth is already priced in. The next potential catalyst is the stock's possible inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index in July.

Odaily星球日报30 min fa

SPCX Pre-Market Dips Below $150 IPO Price, But Don't Rush to Buy Yet

Odaily星球日报30 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures