一览Celestia上6个潜力项目

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-01-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-01-17

Introduzione

我们正处于SOL-ES-TIA季节

原文标题:《 6 Hidden Gems on Celestia》

原文作者:ARNDXT

原文编译:Luccy,BlockBeats

编者按:在 SOL-ES-TIA 叙事下,TIA 市值随之上升。加密研究员 ARNDXT 梳理了基于 Celestia 构建的 6 个潜力项目,包括游戏链 Ancient、rollup 桥 Hyperlane、ZK 方案 Skip、rollup 协议 Cartesi、基础设施 Union 和再质押机制 Alt Layer,并分别阐述了看好因素。BlockBeats 将原文编译如下:

我们正处于 SOL-ES-TIA 季节。

TIA 在市值上将达到 SOL 的水平,将翻 14 倍达到 255 美元。

TIA(3, 3)质押机制将树立一个新的范例,而在此基础上构建的内容将是我将要讲述的重点。这里有 6 个基于 TIA 构建的项目。

Ancient

Ancient 是一个利用具有以太坊安全性的 Optimistic rollups 的游戏链。

他们基于 Celestia 构建,可实现可扩展性、降低交易成本以及近乎即时的确认。Ancient 提供无与伦比的可扩展性。

催化剂:

  • 我预计 2024 年 Web3 游戏将结合公会、社区所有权和可持续的代币经济模型。

  • 社区和投资者是游戏的关键,他们从游戏公会开始,看到用户群快速增长,然后建立了自己的游戏链。

一览Celestia上6个潜力项目

HyperLane

Hyperlane 是第一个 Celestia rollup 桥。

任何人都可以将 hyperlane 部署到任何区块链环境中,包括 L1、rollup、应用链。

催化剂:

  • Hyperlane 文档很简单

  • Celestia 可以轻松启动 rollup。

  • Hyperlane 可以轻松连接所有这些 rollup。

Celestia 之下,Hyperlane 之间,模块式扩展。一览Celestia上6个潜力项目

Skip

Skip 是 Celestia Baselayer 中的 ZK,并提供用于互操作性的 SDK

催化剂:

比较起来很奇怪,因为两者解决问题的方式不同,但有一些相似之处。

  • Eigenlayer 通过为流动性质押提供可组合的流动性来解决这个问题。

  • Skip 提供用于互操作性的 SDK。

一览Celestia上6个潜力项目

Cartesi

Cartesi 是一个特定于应用程序的 rollup 协议,具有基于 Celestia 构建的 Linux 运行时。

它们在数据模型训练和链上游戏基础设施中具有多种用途。

催化剂:

  • gas 费用的巨大节省为开源游戏提供了可能性,将 Werewolf 等独特的库引入到 Cartesi VM 中。

  • 后端是用 #Python 编码的,因此您不必成为 #Solidity 开发人员即可创建 dApp

一览Celestia上6个潜力项目

Union

Union 是一个超高效的零知识基础设施层,用于一般消息传递、资产转移、NFT 和 DeFi。

催化剂:

  • 筹集 400 万种子轮

  • 2024 年 1 月份推出

  • 在 ZK 上运行,互操作性叙述

一览Celestia上6个潜力项目

Alt Layer

Alt Layer 采用现有的 rollup(从任何 rollup 堆栈中衍生出来,例如 OP Stack、Arbitrum Orbit、ZKStack、Polygon CDK 等),并为它们提供 EigenLayer 的再质押机制,以引导网络安全并构建去中心化网络。

重新打包的 rollup 本质上是一组三个垂直集成的 AVS。

催化剂:

  • 制定再质押+rollup 的叙述

  • rollup 即服务

  • 支持者:@balajis @polychaincap @hjmomtazi @jump_ @gavofyork @kaiynne @tekinsalimi @twobitidiot

一览Celestia上6个潜力项目原文链接

Letture associate

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit4 h fa

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit4 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit7 h fa

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit7 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit10 h fa

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit10 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片