South Korean Financial Regulator Says U.S. Bitcoin ETFs May Violate Local Law

CoinDeskPolicy2024-01-11 tarihinde yayınlandı2024-01-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Further review and consideration regarding crypto ETFs is planned, the regulator says.

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC), the nation’s financial regulator, said in a statement that recently-listed U.S. bitcoin ETFs may violate Korean law.

The regulator says that domestic brokerage of a U.S.-listed bitcoin spot ETF by Korean securities firms may potentially conflict with the country’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act and the Capital Markets Act without elaborating.

In 2017, The Bank of Korea’s governor, Lee Ju-yeol, stated that cryptocurrencies are commodities, not legal tender, and emphasized the need for regulation in this area.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The FSC said in its notice that further review is coming. SEC chair Gary Gensler is scheduled to meet his Korean counterpart sometime this month in Washington, DC.

Recently, authorities in South Korea said they were planning on creating regulations that would make officials’ crypto holdings public.

In the U.S., Vanguard has decided not to offer spot bitcoin ETFs, including BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), on its platform, citing what it calls a misalignment with the company’s investment portfolio strategy.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.


İlgili Okumalar

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparative Analysis of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

This report from Blockstream Research analyzes three lattice-based signature schemes as quantum-resistant candidates for Bitcoin, focusing on Dilithium, Falcon, and the now-withdrawn Hawk. Core evaluation criteria include on-chain costs (combined size of public key and signature), implementation complexity, deployment risks, and potential for integration with Bitcoin's existing infrastructure like BIP-32 hierarchical deterministic wallets. Key Findings: * **Dilithium** is praised for its design simplicity, using only integer operations, making secure implementation easier. However, it has the largest size (5,261 bytes for security level 3). * **Falcon** offers the most compact signatures and the fastest verification. Its main drawback—platform-dependent floating-point operations in signing—can be mitigated with a slower, deterministic integer-based implementation. The report recommends **Falcon-1024** (security level 5) for its safety margin. * **Hawk**, which aimed for a better balance, was withdrawn after a cryptographic attack revealed a structural flaw that halved its estimated security. The report concludes that Falcon-1024 is the most suitable lattice-based choice for Bitcoin, pending the finalization of its NIST FN-DSA standard. In the short term, it still recommends hash-based signatures (like SPHINCS+) as a lower-risk transitional solution, with future hybrid deployments as a possibility.

marsbit1 saat önce

How Can Bitcoin Resist Quantum Computers? A Comparative Analysis of Three Lattice-Based Signature Schemes

marsbit1 saat önce

Ripple (XRP) Company Announces Plans for Major Future Update

Ripple (XRP) has announced a four-phase plan to prepare the XRP Ledger (XRPL) for future security threats posed by quantum computers. The company's senior director of engineering stated the goal is to build necessary infrastructure before quantum computers become a direct threat, aiming to minimize impact on existing systems, user assets, and network operations. The plan begins with identifying potential quantum vulnerabilities within XRPL, followed by testing quantum-resistant cryptographic methods. The next phase involves parallel testing of existing security mechanisms and new quantum-resistant solutions to ensure reliability and prevent disruption for users and applications. The final phase would involve transitioning the XRPL to more comprehensive, quantum-resistant security standards if the technology matures. Ripple is also developing contingency plans for a faster-than-expected advancement of quantum computing, which could accelerate the transition timeline. A current XRPL feature allowing users to change the keys controlling their accounts without altering the accounts themselves is seen as a potential advantage in any future migration. However, Ripple cannot unilaterally change transaction validation rules or network-wide cryptographic standards; such updates require coordination and approval from independent validators via XRPL's governance process. While quantum computers are not yet capable of breaking the cryptography used by major blockchains like Bitcoin or XRPL, developers across the industry are already evaluating transition scenarios to quantum-resistant algorithms due to the long-term risks they pose to public-key cryptography.

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

Ripple (XRP) Company Announces Plans for Major Future Update

cryptonews.ru2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片