为什么Gas Hero会重新定义链游?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-01-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-01-02

Introduzione

StepN团队新作Gas Hero将在24小时内公开发布。

原文来自 Mable Jiang 的 X 平台,由Odaily星球日报 jk 编译。

为什么Gas Hero会重新定义链游?

在这篇文章中,我将讨论为什么 Gas Hero 将成为下一个定义链上游戏的应用程序,以及即使你不玩游戏,这对你(和 GMT)为什么重要。

自从我们两年前使 StepN 成为一个定义链游的应用程序以来,数百万人了解了非托管钱包,并进行了他们的第一次链上 Swap 交易。

自从我们看到另一个定义整个类别的应用程序以来已经有一段时间了,但不久之后你就会看到下一个。具体来说,就在 24 小时内。

Gas Hero 是:

a) 一款加速的、博弈论导向的人类社会模拟游戏;

b) 一个拥有一套清晰规则+高度自由度的游乐场,人们在其中进行合作和竞争;

c) 一款社交和策略导向的金融游戏(我坚持不称其为“社交金融(Social-Fi)”,因为熟悉我的人都知道我有多讨厌这个词)。

免责声明:本帖不构成任何财务建议,因此我不会提供任何关于 Gas Hero 如何与$GMT 的上涨相关的建议或者详细计算。你可以在 Gas Hero 白皮书中找到有关 GMT 流入和流出的所有信息(https://whitepaper.gashero.com)。我只是在这里与您分享我的猜测,为什么会有人(是的,你不必是游戏玩家就会上瘾,因为我也不是游戏玩家)使用并留在 Gas Hero 中。我相信一些 Aper 会为自己或许为所有人进行数学计算,哈哈。请自行研究(DYOR)。

1. 为什么大家都关心 Gas Hero?当人们为体验付费时,他们获得什么外部性收益?

任何为娱乐付费的人都在寻求某种形式的“舒适”或积极反馈。在 Gas Hero 中,您总能以某种形式的人类欲望:权力、荣耀或财富获得舒适感。

让我们具体解构人们获得的体验:

a) 权力:无论你想要成为一个州长统治地区还是作为一个利他主义者服务,游戏世界由你来控制或贡献;

b) 荣耀:战略家旨在智胜对手,将军寻求战胜敌人;

c) 财富:农民收获产量,而商人利用套利机会获利。

重要的是,规则设置得简单,使每个人都能找到他们特定的乐趣点(如你从我这了解到的,一个愿望可以通过多种方式实现)。规则内的任何事物都是允许的;因此实现这些愿望的手段也是多样的。

2. 谁在付费?

要成为 Gas Hero 中的领导者或在 PvP 中赢得一定级别的胜利,一个人需要先花费某些东西并装备好所需的装备,才足够具有竞争力。

首先,这些个体在成为有竞争力的高端玩家之前就预付款是有激励机制的,他们希望获得更大份额的回报——领导者从 NFT 市场费中获利,PvP 的赢家从拍卖行收入中获利。试图成为领导者但失败的玩家,以及在竞争中输掉的 PvP 玩家在支付这笔费用。

此外,选择财富体验路线的人实际上是流动性提供者,因为他们不断地在 PvE 资源/拍卖行中的商品与二级市场上列出的商品之间架起价格套利的桥梁。

3. 为什么人们会一直玩这个游戏?

Gas Hero 中有两个关键的设计概念:希望(Hope)和联系(Bonding)

希望(Hope)来自任何带有概率的事件:繁殖、升级、开启胶囊等。知道某事件的机会很低从未剥夺人们在实际获得低概率结果时的快乐。人们倾向于相信/希望他们是幸运的,当希望变为现实时会感到特别高兴。

联系(Bonding)是通过需要合作或竞争的活动赋予的。当人们知道一起完成团队任务可以使每个人都更好时,他们不仅会合作,甚至会吸引尚未合作的人加入他们的队伍。当一个人被实力接近他/她的人击败时,他/她很可能会想再试一次,并在下一次尝试中超越对手。

通过正确平衡希望和遗憾,以及玩家之间的充分联系,体验曲线将是波动的,但趋势向上。即使他们没有得到他们希望的结果(即成为管辖区领导者或赢得 PvP),他们会在下一个选举周期再次尝试,因为他们在途中收到了一些小的积极反馈,新的希望和旧的联系总是鼓励他们留下来。

更多关于 Gas Hero 的设计概念可以点击这里了解。

4. 为什么会有更多人对加入这个游戏感兴趣?

显然,作为一个社交/策略导向的金融游戏,钱非常重要,但这还有待真正的玩家揭示,所以我不会过多参与价格的讨论。

这个游戏世界会自然地吸引更多人加入,因为机制被设计为对那些能够事先就进行很好合作的人有利。当一个人被游戏提供的体验所吸引时,他有动力去为自己带来更多玩家,并教育他们关于游戏的知识,因为他们可以通过合作一起获得更好的体验。

5. 我们从 STEPN 中学到了什么,使 Gas Hero 成为一个好的博弈论模拟世界?

a) 资产的有限寿命 -> 非永续生产性资产+更好的资产周转/NFT 流动性

b) 多样化生产收益(从可替代代币转变为各种资源的 NFT)并将收益转化为衍生生产性资产 -> 增加了游戏策略的潜在深度

c) 季节性设置 -> 允许经济在进入长尾周期后完全复兴,为新玩家提供加入的空间

d) 实施一个允许市场力量自我调节的系统 -> 市场的“看不见的手”的制约与平衡是一个强大、灵活且可持续经济的基石

6. 接下来会发生什么?这对你来说为什么重要?

你可能仍对通过 Gas Hero 体验另一种生活并在权力、荣耀或财富中找到满足感持怀疑态度。

但是至少,你可能会想关注因为游戏锁定在链上的 GMT 的数量。只是让你知道(我甚至不打算深入讨论),拍卖行收入(游戏内初次销售的收入)的一半被销毁,而游戏内汇流(升级、繁殖、BCV 建设等)的一半也被销毁。做一些数学计算,您将看到整个 Find Satoshi Lab 社区所作的集体努力,将使 GMT 走上更远、更长的旅程。

你可以:

1. 在 24 小时内,在http://gashero.com上玩游戏

2. 查看 Dune Dashboard:https://dune.com/0x hero/gh(游戏启动后更新总游戏内 GMT 锁定量和游戏资产交易量)

Letture associate

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

The report analyzes five Nasdaq-listed AI infrastructure stocks—Micron (MU), MaxLinear (MXL), AMD, Lumentum (LITE), and Vicor (VICR)—as distinct plays within the AI capital expenditure chain, rather than a single "AI trade." While all benefit from AI data center spending, they differ in their specific roles (e.g., memory, computing, optics, power, connectivity), financial resilience, and risk profiles. The author argues that the key question is not whether the AI narrative remains intact, but whether capital expenditure translates into real orders, earnings justify valuations, and portfolios can withstand high volatility. Historical data shows these stocks have significantly outperformed benchmarks but also experienced deeper drawdowns (~28% to -32%), highlighting their high-beta, high-volatility nature. An investment framework is proposed: core positions (e.g., MU, AMD) for stocks with stronger fundamental evidence; satellite positions (e.g., LITE, VICR) for high-potential, high-volatility names; and cautious observation (e.g., MXL) for smaller-cap ideas with unproven financials. The emphasis is on disciplined, phased buying during pullbacks—only when price corrections align with intact fundamentals and available risk budget—rather than emotional "buy-the-dip" strategies. Overall, AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but success requires strict position sizing, role definition for each holding, and preparedness for significant volatility.

marsbit59 min fa

Focus: Five Leading AI Stocks on Nasdaq

marsbit59 min fa

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: - According to reports, Standard Chartered Bank has published a research report on Uniswap, setting a 2030 price target of $100 for the UNI token. - The bank's core logic is that the tokenization of assets will drive demand for open DeFi liquidity, and Uniswap could capture significant trading volume and fee revenue. - However, most institutional-grade tokenized products are permissioned, and the example of BlackRock's BUIDL shows that DeFi still faces significant access barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 target for UNI by 2030 is based on the hypothesis that tokenized assets will grow massively and a significant portion will flow into open DeFi markets, requiring decentralized exchange platforms like Uniswap for liquidity. The bank forecasts tokenized assets could reach $4 trillion by 2028, with up to 30% in DeFi by 2030. The key question is whether tokenized assets like treasuries and funds will trade in open, decentralized markets or remain within closed, permissioned institutional systems. This directly impacts Uniswap's potential growth. A real-world example is BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which, while using UniswapX for trading, is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This highlights the current trend: institutions may leverage DeFi infrastructure but maintain strict control over access and transfers. Furthermore, for UNI's value to rise significantly, Uniswap must establish a clear value-capture mechanism, such as the approved fee switch and token burn proposal. Regulatory and interoperability hurdles also persist, as noted by bodies like the Financial Stability Board. In summary, Standard Chartered's bold prediction hinges on the future flow of tokenized asset liquidity. While it signals institutional recognition of DeFi's potential, the path to $100 depends on overcoming current permissioned models and enabling truly open, cross-asset liquidity pools on platforms like Uniswap.

Foresight News1 h fa

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Will Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

Foresight News1 h fa

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily Editorial Team Casual Chat (June 17) This is an informal column sharing real-time thoughts from Odaily's editorial team on industry news, data, and events. The content is based on actual investment and observations, does not constitute investment advice, and aims to expand perspectives. Azuma shared recent operations: small-scale buys in crypto (mainly BTC) at relatively high levels, a small addition to HOOD stock, and participation in World Cup prediction markets. He also discussed Hyperliquid, noting that while its token HYPE has performed well, its high price may hinder the expansion of its HIP-3 ecosystem by making market creation cost-prohibitive, potentially limiting the platform to just one major market (trade.xyz). Suzz emphasized the importance of a calm mindset in investing, stating that markets offer perpetual opportunities. He warned against "hindsight bias," where past opportunities seem obvious, and stressed that the present always holds new chances for those with the right knowledge and temperament. Golem analyzed SpaceX's acquisition of AI tool Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion paid entirely in SpaceX stock. He speculated whether Musk's interests might work to keep SpaceX's trading volume and market cap high in the short term to reduce the actual equity cost of the deal, noting current high retail investor enthusiasm. Wenser shared a market outlook: cautiously bullish on BTC, monitoring SpaceX stock post-IPO for a potential rise, observing World Cup trends favoring strong teams, and noting the continued strength of Japanese and Korean stocks. He highlighted Anthropic's potential for a massive future IPO and the defensive investment logic in "picks and shovels" AI infrastructure. Qin Xiaofeng discussed trading HYPE around $56-$70, viewing the $50-$60 range as long-term support due to Hyperliquid's dominance in on-chain traditional asset trading and its substantial fee revenue used to buy back HYPE. On ETH, he noted a divide between disappointed crypto natives and bullish traditional investors like Tom Lee, personally viewing current ETH prices as undervalued.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Odaily Editorial Team Tea Talk (June 17)

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片