Silly飙涨、Meme热潮再起,这些新项目值得关注

Odaily星球日报2023-12-21 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-12-21 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

盘点Solana和Avalanche新热门Meme。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Loopy

Silly飙涨、Meme热潮再起,这些新项目值得关注

最近的加密市场,除了铭文外,Meme 板块同样热度颇高。多个代币在短短一周内价格持续攀升超过 100 倍。Odaily星球日报盘点了近期多个热门 Meme 币种。

风险提示:Meme 为高风险市场,存在较大风险。本文盘点 Meme 币均为近期社区热议、成交量表现较好的项目,但均未进行项目背景调查,且均为极早期、小市值项目,部分项目发行尚不足 24 小时。

早期 Meme 存在极大归零风险,请投资者谨慎参与。

Odaily星球日报注:部分代币发行尚不足 24 小时,其 24 小时涨幅基数为初始发行价格。发行价格由 LP 提供者人为设定,价格不具有参考性。

Solana 生态

欧易 OKX 行情显示,Solana 代币 SOL 代币近日突破 88 美元,创下年内新高;Solana 生态成顺势为市场关注焦点,Meme 项目层出不穷,其中以 Silly Dragon(SILLY)表现最为耀眼。

今年 11 月,Solana 生态的年度峰会 Solana Breakpoint 2023 举办。在峰会上,Solana 联合创始人Anatoly Yakovenko 身着万圣节服装发表主题演讲,其演讲主题已经无人关注,但其万圣装扮却为 Solana 生态带来了一个 Meme——Silly Dragon。

Silly飙涨、Meme热潮再起,这些新项目值得关注

以这套装扮为主题,Silly Dragon(SILLY)在近两天时间里快速上涨,约两天时间内最高涨幅超 6 倍,从低点算起涨幅超过 500 倍,目前已经上线 BitgetCoinW 等多个 CEX 平台。

以下为 Solana 生态近期热度较大的 meme 代币,数据来源 birdeye:

Silly Dragon

代币符号:SILLY

当前 FDV: 7553 万美元

24 小时成交量: 3100 万美元

24 小时涨幅:+ 112.61% 

当前持币地址数: 10, 383 

dogwifhat

代币符号:$WIF

当前 FDV: 2.1 亿美元

24 小时成交量: 7688 万美元

24 小时涨幅:+ 75.06% 

当前持币地址数: 23, 601 

Knob

代币符号:KNOB

当前 FDV: 726 万美元

24 小时成交量: 335 万美元

24 小时涨幅: 2.64% 

当前持币地址数: 3, 874 

Melon Dog

代币符号:MELON

当前 FDV: 320 万美元

24 小时成交量: 567 万美元

24 小时涨幅:+ 26, 608.66% 

当前持币地址数: 3, 078 

SOLANA SUPER-BONER

代币符号:BONER

当前 FDV: 112 万美元

24 小时成交量: 568 万美元

24 小时涨幅:+ 60, 534.96% 

当前持币地址数: 3, 807 

Opie

代币符号:OPIE

当前 FDV: 100 万美元

24 小时成交量: 136 万美元

24 小时涨幅:+ 1, 496.21% 

当前持币地址数: 1, 995 

Avalanche 生态

与 Solana 相似,AVAX 代币也在近日突飞猛进。欧易 OKX 行情显示,AVAX 在近日最高触及 46 USDT,创下年内新高。

Silly飙涨、Meme热潮再起,这些新项目值得关注

而在 Avalanche 生态上,与 AVAX 一起火热的不只是铭文,还有 meme 代币。

COQ(雪崩鸡)即是其中的代表。Coq Inu 是一款鸡主题的 meme,创建于 12 月 8 日。自推出以来,COQ 的市值迅速增长,最高一度达到 2.3 亿美元。COQ 代币的开发者明确表示,这个代币没有内在价值,也不应期待财务回报,其网站上明确写道:“这个币完全无用,仅供娱乐。” 

目前,COQ 已经上线 Kucoin。

以下为 Avalanche 生态近期热度较大的 meme 代币,数据来源 birdeye:

Coq Inu./strong>

代币符号:GEC

当前 FDV: 1.42 亿美元

24 小时成交量: 1963 万美元

24 小时涨幅:-20.86% 

当前持币地址数: 1, 443 

Kimbo

代币符号:KIMBO

当前 FDV: 1335 万美元

24 小时成交量: 1317 万美元

24 小时涨幅:-37.72% 

当前持币地址数: 6, 156 

Landwolf

代币符号:WOLF

当前 FDV: 354 万美元

24 小时成交量: 118 万美元

24 小时涨幅:-43.7% 

当前持币地址数: 6, 059 

Gecko Inu

代币符号:GEC

当前 FDV: 354 万美元

24 小时成交量: 107 万美元

24 小时涨幅:-43.7% 

当前持币地址数: 6, 059 

结语

目前,随着大盘的好转,山寨市场似乎正在全面“起飞”。但若从“刻舟求剑”的角度解读,meme 的“漫天飞舞”,是否又是一场“闪崩”的前奏呢?

Odaily星球日报提醒广大投资者,meme 市场风险巨大,请合理投资,做好风险防范。

İlgili Okumalar

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

marsbit12 dk önce

Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbit12 dk önce

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbit19 dk önce

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbit19 dk önce

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbit19 dk önce

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbit19 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片