CZ's Guilty Plea Accepted by Judge, Has Yet to Decide If Binance Founder Can Go Home

CoinDeskPolicyPubblicato 2023-12-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-12-06

Introduzione

Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to violating the Bank Secrecy Act last month.

A federal judge accepted Binance founder Changpeng "CZ" Zhao's guilty plea to one count of violating the Bank Secrecy Act, but has not yet weighed in on whether Zhao can go back to the United Arab Emirates before he is sentenced in February.

Federal Judge Richard Jones, of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, accepted the plea on Wednesday, just over two weeks after Zhao and Binance, the exchange he founded, pleaded guilty to various violations tied to poor anti-money laundering practices at the world's largest crypto exchange. Zhao stepped down from his role as CEO of the exchange as part of the guilty pleas.

10

"This Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which there has been no timely objection ... hereby accepts the plea of guilty of the defendant ... the defendant is adjudged guilty of such offense," the judge wrote. "All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sentencing is currently scheduled for Feb. 23, 2024. Zhao has been released on bond ahead of that date, though prosecutors have asked that he be required to stay in the U.S. through sentencing. The Binance founder's attorneys have argued that Zhao is not a flight risk, and should be allowed to return to the UAE, where his family is, until February.

Under the current terms of his bond release, Zhao would be allowed to go back, but must return to the U.S. two weeks prior to sentencing. Judge Jones stayed that part of Zhao's release last week until he can make a final ruling on the matter, requiring him to stay in the country for the moment.

Binance, which pleaded guilty to three charges, including one sanctions-related charge, has to allow monitors who can report back to the Department of Justice and the Treasury Department as part of its plea deal, which also saw it agree to pay a massive $4.3 billion fine. Richard Teng, a former director at Binance, has taken over as CEO.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Letture associate

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

The competition for control over the tokenization infrastructure, or the "rails," is intensifying, moving beyond initial asset listing to dominance over settlement, custody, and regulatory layers. Recent developments signal a shift in power towards traditional finance. Key evidence includes: the formation of the BankChain Alliance by 39 U.S. state banking associations to launch a banking-owned blockchain network; moves by market infrastructure giants like DTCC, ICE, and Citadel Securities to establish their own institutional-grade on-chain systems; the struggle of crypto-native custodians like ZeroHash (re-applying for a bank charter) and Copper (facing a severe valuation drop), highlighting that regulatory "license moats" are now more critical than technical advantages; and the launch of stablecoin USD1 by licensed trust bank BitGo on the permissioned Canton network, showing convergence of stablecoin issuance towards regulated entities. The analysis concludes this is not a simple "banks vs. crypto" battle but a redefinition of the foundational infrastructure. A clear division of labor is emerging: open public chains for DeFi and innovation, while bank-led consortium chains and licensed entities capture institutional settlement, tokenized deposits, and regulated custody. The defining question is no longer *if* an asset is tokenized, but *on which rails* it runs and *who controls* those rails, with regulation and牌照 providing the ultimate backstop.

marsbit8 min fa

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

marsbit8 min fa

SEC Submits Proposal to White House for Revising Crypto Asset Custody Rules

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has submitted a proposal to the White House for revising rules governing the custody of crypto-assets by investment advisers and funds. Dated August 25, 2026, the proposal—known as Amendments to the Custody Rules (RIN 3235-AN46)—has entered review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). The SEC aims to clarify the regulatory framework for crypto-asset custody and modernize certain requirements it deems outdated in light of market and technological evolution. The proposal, classified as economically significant and deregulatory under Executive Order 14192, seeks to alleviate industry burdens by removing redundant rules rather than imposing new ones. This initiative emerges amid Congressional delays in passing the comprehensive Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY). SEC Chair Paul Atkins previously indicated the agency would proceed with its own rules if CLARITY stalled. The SEC plans to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in October 2026, followed by a standard public comment period. The move marks a shift from the post-2008 Madoff scandal era, which spurred stricter custody rules, toward a more flexible approach for crypto markets. However, unresolved technical questions, such as the regulatory treatment of private key custody, remain. The proposal balances industry adaptability against potential risks, as reduced oversight could delay the detection of custody issues.

cryptonews.ru20 min fa

SEC Submits Proposal to White House for Revising Crypto Asset Custody Rules

cryptonews.ru20 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片