28 Indian Crypto Service Providers Have Registered With Country’s Anti-Money Laundering Unit

CoinDeskPolicyPublished on 2023-12-03Last updated on 2023-12-04

Abstract

In March, India's Finance Ministry mandated that crypto businesses will have to register with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

As many as 28 Virtual Digital Assets (VDA) or crypto service providers have registered themselves with India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

The Indian Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary told the Parliament’s Lower House in a written reply to a question on Monday.

In March, India’s Finance Ministry mandated that crypto businesses will have to register with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the country's anti-money laundering unit, and comply with other processes under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). This meant crypto businesses became legally obligated to perform verification processes such as Know Your Customer (KYC).

Advertisement
Advertisement

The reply from India’s finance ministry also revealed that “the guidelines and reporting requirements are applicable to offshore crypto exchanges servicing the Indian Market” and that “appropriate action under PMLA" would be taken against non-compliant offshore platforms.

While major exchanges such as CoinDCX, WaxirX and CoinSwitch have all registered with the FIU, none of the 28 entities appear to be offshore companies.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.

Related Reads

Fantasy's Closing Notes: After Two and a Half Years of Trial and Error in SocialFi, What Have We Learned?

"Fantasy Shutdown Notes: Two and a Half Years of SocialFi Trial, What Have We Learned?" Fantasy, a SocialFi/crypto card game, is shutting down. The team is refunding 100% of investments to angel/seed round backers, as operational costs were fully covered by revenue. Over 2.5 years, the project returned approximately $20M to its community. The core reason for failure was building crypto economics on a foundation not designed for it. Traditional card games (Magic, Pokémon) succeed by prioritizing gameplay; financial value is a secondary outcome. Crypto card games invert this, attracting speculators first, not genuine players. This financialization trapped the team into managing a financial instrument instead of developing a game. This is a sector-wide issue. Embedding tokenomics into social products or creator-fan relationships often attracts short-term traders over genuine users, undermining the core value. The article also critiques premature token launches. Most tokens fail because they're issued before product-market fit is proven, diverting team and community focus to price speculation instead of building. Successful examples like Hyperliquid or Jupiter built sustainable businesses first. Fantasy's journey highlights key crypto pitfalls: the distorting effect of upfront financialization in gaming/social apps, and the dangers of launching tokens too early. The team hopes sharing these lessons helps future builders avoid the same traps.

marsbit12m ago

Fantasy's Closing Notes: After Two and a Half Years of Trial and Error in SocialFi, What Have We Learned?

marsbit12m ago

Two Companies Capture 90% of AI Startup's $80 Billion ARR

The AI startup landscape is highly concentrated, with OpenAI and Anthropic capturing 89% of an estimated $80 billion in annualized revenue among 34 leading companies. OpenAI, with $24-25B in revenue, primarily drives growth through ChatGPT's consumer subscriptions, while Anthropic, exceeding $30B, focuses on enterprise API integration and has rapidly grown its U.S. enterprise market share from under 1% to 34.4% in under two years. The remaining 32 companies share just 11% of the revenue, facing intense pressure as resources, talent, and market attention consolidate around the two giants. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle where higher revenue fuels greater compute investment and model improvement. Despite their dominance, both leaders face challenges. OpenAI is navigating significant legal disputes and partnership tensions, while Anthropic operates under the high expectations of its massive backers like Amazon. Historical parallels in tech infrastructure (e.g., search engines, mobile OS) suggest such oligopolistic tendencies are common due to scale, network effects, and high switching costs, indicating the market could become even more concentrated. However, the rapid pace of AI innovation leaves room for disruption. For other players, the strategic path forward is not direct competition with the giants but specialization in vertical domains where general-purpose models fall short—such as legal, medical, or industrial applications—building indispensable, niche solutions.

marsbit21m ago

Two Companies Capture 90% of AI Startup's $80 Billion ARR

marsbit21m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片