BTC生态 | 铭文市场起飞，BRC-20价值外溢

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2023-11-16Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-11-16

Introduzione

你买的铭文涨了多少？

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Loopy Lu

BTC生态 | 铭文市场起飞，BRC-20价值外溢

今日，加密市场的走势再次大幅上扬，Odaily星球日报于今早发布《BTC 再度逼近 38000 美元，小牛结局还是大牛伊始？》一文报对行情进行了解读。

而在大盘亮眼的表现中，BRC-20 板块的狂飙突进最为引起投资者关注。比特币铭文市场已经迎来了“狂暴大牛”，铸造的比特币序数铭文总数已攀升至新纪录。

Dune 数据显示，过去一天，单日铸造的比特币序数铭文数量激增至 50.5 万个，创下历史新高。而截至目前，全网铸造的铭文总数已经超过4083 万枚，为了完成这些铭文的铸造，已经消耗了约2564 枚 BTC，约合9614 万美元。

BTC生态 | 铭文市场起飞，BRC-20价值外溢

投资者不仅对铭文的铸造热情高涨，BRC-20 的市场也一样极度繁荣，多种 BRC-20 代币在今日快速上涨。

Odaily星球日报统计了多个市值较大、近日热度较高、且快速上涨的 BRC-20 代币，具体情况如下：

BTC生态 | 铭文市场起飞，BRC-20价值外溢

近一周以来，多款铭文代币获得了数倍的涨幅。例如，rats 或许是今日话题最高的 BRC-20 代币，这一代币近日的高额获利让社区热议其或许是下一个 meme。而一些小市值代币则更容易在短时间内快速拉升，例如，mfsq、jpeg 均在今日一日之间获得了超过三倍的涨幅。

BRC-20 市场的火热，也引发了链上手续费的飙升。

Ycharts 数据显示，本周稍早时，比特币的平均费用一度飙升至 15.86 美元，目前仍在接近 10 美元的高位区间。

BTC生态 | 铭文市场起飞，BRC-20价值外溢

本轮 BRC 牛市，矿工无疑成为了最大的获益方之一。目前，减半距离我们并不遥远。明年减半之后，比特币区块奖励将从 6.25 BTC 减少到 3.125 BTC，而手续费的快速攀升无疑为矿工提供了更为丰富的收入来源。

而作为 BRC-20 生态的“龙头”代币，ORDI 的涨幅虽然（与其他 meme 相比）并不瞩目，但这一代币已经成为了庞然大物。

BTC生态 | 铭文市场起飞，BRC-20价值外溢

欧易 OKX 行情显示，ORDI 价格今日一度达到 27.8 美元，创下历史新高。目前 ORDI 市值约为 5.3 亿美元，coingecko 数据显示，这一市值表现已经进入加密世界的前 100 位排名，目前为市值第 96 大的代币。对于一款新生的 meme 币来说，这一表现颇为亮眼。

今日，除“传统”的比特币铭文市场外，Polygon 铭文也一度引发链上 gas 飞涨。

目前，铭文市场全面“起飞”，其价值早已外溢至不止 BTC 一条链。而从社区的立场出发，我们可将其解读为投资者对这一新兴市场的看好。但若从“刻舟求剑”的角度解读，meme 的“漫天飞舞”，是否又是一场“闪崩”的前奏呢？Odaily星球日报将保持关注。

Letture associate

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit7 min fa

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit7 min fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit17 min fa

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit17 min fa

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit27 min fa

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit27 min fa

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit41 min fa

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit41 min fa

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit44 min fa

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit44 min fa

Trading

Spot

Futures