一周代币解锁预告:HFT、APT均迎来历史最大规模解锁

Odaily星球日报Published on 2023-11-05Last updated on 2023-11-05

Abstract

历史性解锁事件发生,投资者谨慎注意风险

整理 | Odaily星球日报

编辑 | Loopy

一周代币解锁预告:HFT、APT均迎来历史最大规模解锁

具体解锁详情如下:

一周代币解锁预告:HFT、APT均迎来历史最大规模解锁

Hashflow

项目官网:https://www.hashflow.com/

官方推特:https://twitter.com/hashflow

本次解锁数量: 1.6 亿枚

本次解锁金额:(约) 4209 万美元

Hashflow 是一个去中心化的交易所,旨在实现零滑点和具备 MEV 保护的交易。Hashflow 目前可在以太坊、 BNB Chain、  Polygon、Avalanche、  Arbitrum   和   Optimism   等多链上使用;通过引入专业做市商来管理流动性提供了更好的交易价格,更小的滑点。

HFT 代币的本次解锁是该代币全生命周期中规模最大的单次解锁,解锁规模之庞大值得引起所有人的注意。

一周代币解锁预告:HFT、APT均迎来历史最大规模解锁

从解锁历史来看,此前 HFT 代币均在有条不紊的进行线性解锁之中,每月均会迎来一次规模相仿的解锁。到目前为止,总供应量 26% 的 HFT 已经进入流通,仍有 74% 的代币等待解锁。

归属于团队、早期投资者、做市商、未来员工四者的代币是本次大额解锁的原因。这四者的代币,其中 75% 均会在 36 个月的时间里线性释放,每月解锁一次。但剩余的 25% 则会于代币发布一年后(即下周)一次性释放。因此,这引发了本次释放量接近流通量的巨额解锁。

本次解锁的 1.6 亿枚代币约占流通量的 73% ,这也意味着,一夜之间 HFT 流通量近乎翻倍 。

本次解锁,是 HFT 全生命周期历史最大的一次单一解锁,无论是此前还是今后都不会再复现同等规模的解锁。这一解锁或将会冲击市场走向,投资者应及时捕捉交易机会或规避相关风险。

Aptos

项目官网:https://aptoslabs.com/

官方推特:https://twitter.com/Aptos_Network

本次解锁数量: 2484 万枚

本次解锁金额:(约) 1.75 亿美元

Aptos 是此前一段时间内备受关注的 Move 系公链双雄之一,由 Facebook 背景和技术所支持的这条新生 Layer 1 备受大资本的关注。该链旨在为用户提供性能好、TPS 更高的下一代 PoS 公链,以此来支持区块链在应用层的普及,并为加密世界迎接十亿级的用户。

从流通量来看,尽管 APT 解锁量远远低于 HFT 这种特殊情况,但占据流通量 10% 的解锁仍然是并不常见的大额解锁。

Aptos 项目市值较大,本次解锁的代币也高达约 1.75 亿美元。

一周代币解锁预告:HFT、APT均迎来历史最大规模解锁

从解锁历史来看,此前 APT 均在每月固定解锁,解锁规模每月相似。而本次解锁以后,每月解锁规模将会发生改变。

因此,本次 APT 解锁也是截至目前为止,规模最大的一次单次解锁。

APT 本次超过 1.7 亿美元的解锁,值得引起投资者关注。若与交易量相比较,CoinGecko 数据显示,APT 24 小时交易额约为 7500 万美元。

常规解锁

除 HFT、APT 两项历史级大额解锁外,下周其他代币的解锁量均不足流通量 1% 。包括波卡生态 Moonbeam 代币 GLMR、DeFi 项目 Euler 代币 EUL、老牌 DEX 项目1inch代币1INCH等。

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit4h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit4h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit4h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片