'A Pyramid of Deceit': Prosecutors Begin Closing Argument in Sam Bankman-Fried Fraud Trial

CoinDeskPolicy2023-10-31 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-11-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The U.S. Department of Justice is hoping the four-week case will lead to a conviction on seven charges.

Sam Bankman-Fried "told a story, and he lied to you," a federal prosecutor said Wednesday in his closing argument against the FTX founder.

The U.S. Department of Justice is wrapping up its case against Bankman-Fried after nearly five weeks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas Roos, who is presenting the DOJ's denouement, opened by noting that there was "no dispute" that billions of dollars worth of customer funds from the FTX crypto exchange were gone. Bankman-Fried faces two counts of wire fraud and five counts of conspiracy tied to the operation and collapse of FTX and Alameda Research, Bankman-Fried's trading firm.

10

"This is a pyramid of deceit by the defendant built on lies and false promises," he said.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Roos asked the jury to keep three questions in mind as they review the evidence: where the money went, what happened and who was responsible, repeating these questions several times.

"Now that you've seen all the evidence and heard all testimonies, you know the answer," Roos said, pointing to Bankman-Fried. "This man," the prosecutor said. "The defendant is responsible."

Bankman-Fried's former employees quit when they learned about the missing money, and his fellow executives testified that they didn't know customer funds were being misused until it was too late, Roos said.

"Their understanding was customer funds were not allowed to be used by FTX or anyone else," he said. "Customer funds belonged to customers."

Roos pointed to witness testimony and Bankman-Fried's own turn on the stand, saying the defendant morphed into a "different person" when answering the DOJ's questions as opposed to defense attorney Mark Cohen's.

"He came up with a tale," Roos said, asking the jury if they noticed how during cross-examination, Bankman-Fried couldn't remember details, whereas during the direct examination, he frequently described situations from his life. "You'd have to ignore the evidence to believe his story."

Both the prosecution and the defense rested their respective cases between the end of last week and Tuesday. Closing arguments are expected to last through all of Wednesday, with the DOJ potentially presenting a rebuttal argument as well at the end of the day or on Thursday.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Court got off to a rough start Wednesday with a juror running late, followed by the session needing to be delayed due to technical issues with some of the monitors that display exhibits.

Bankman-Fried's parents arrived at the Manhattan courthouse close to 9 a.m., but appear to have left the courtroom prior to Roos beginning his presentation.

Sam Kessler contributed reporting.

Edited by Nick Baker and Marc Hochstein.

İlgili Okumalar

a16z Deep Dive: Stop Chasing the 'AI Smell', Here's a Practical Guide to Writing with AI

"Don't Obsess Over AI Detection: A Practical Guide to Writing Alongside AI" by Steph Zinn (a16z Crypto) This guide moves beyond the flawed premise that AI-generated text can be easily spotted by a set of "tells" and that these features automatically mean poor quality. Instead, it focuses on how writers and founders can use LLMs effectively by understanding, controlling, and editing the common stylistic tendencies of AI-assisted prose. The article breaks down AI writing "tells" into four key dimensions: **1. Rhetorical Features (Insight-Shaped Writing):** AI often produces semantically empty, "corporate-sounding" filler language—vague profundities, hedging phrases, excessive parallelism, and summary statements. The advice is to ruthlessly edit these out, using prompts to make language more specific and direct. **2. Voice Features (The Alexa Voice):** Default AI writing relies on a narrow, fungible vocabulary of low-friction, abstract words and cliché phrases that lack personality. While this generic voice is acceptable for support docs or mass communications, founders should preserve their unique voice for impactful writing. Use LLMs to identify and replace jargon, aiming for concrete, distinctive word choices. **3. Structural Features (Form Without Function):** AI tends towards over-structured text with excessive subheadings, lists, roadmaps, and the rigid "three-point" framework. While clear structure is good for readability and SEO, it shouldn't force ideas into unnatural containers. Choose a structure that serves the format and purpose, borrowing from effective examples. **4. Punctuation Features (Dash Panic):** The overuse of em dashes and colons has become a hallmark, but writers shouldn't avoid useful punctuation just to seem "human." The key is avoiding repetitive, distracting patterns. Use punctuation that is grammatically correct and supports the flow of your argument. The core argument is that many so-called AI flaws are just amplified versions of existing bad writing habits. The goal isn't to eliminate AI's role but to use it as a tool while maintaining editorial control. The final question shouldn't be "Can this be detected as AI?" but "Does this writing effectively do its job?"

marsbit1 saat önce

a16z Deep Dive: Stop Chasing the 'AI Smell', Here's a Practical Guide to Writing with AI

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片