StepN & Axie新旧双王数据剖析:StepN将冲击GameFi王座?

H Forest2022-04-24 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-04-24 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Stepn不但吸取Axie的前车之鉴对代币的经济模型进行了优化,还用Web3.0的方式解决了社会上存在已久的“最后一公里”的问题。

毫无疑问,Stepn已成为2022年一季度加密货币市场上最火的应用,日前Twitter关注人数已突破20w大关。作为Move to Earn的龙头,Stepn游戏机制的设计与Axie有众多相似之处,例如双代币机制、繁衍系统、能量系统;不过遗憾的是,Axie作为2021年的Gamefi龙头,目前已经陷入新增用户不足、恶性通胀的尴尬境地。
Stepn与Axie都是由币安Launchpad所孵化,两者有着相同的资源扶持力度,从Stepn目前的火爆程度来看,它极有可能登顶2022年Gamefi铁王座。Stepn不但吸取Axie的前车之鉴对代币的经济模型进行了优化,例如:增加代币消耗场景与氪金场景,严格的防作弊机制与有趣的邀请码诞生机制(注:用户每运动50分钟才能产生一个邀请码);还用Web3.0的方式解决了社会上存在已久的“最后一公里”的问题,例如我的Crypto degen同事们,豪车也不开了,每天坐地铁上下班只是为了用Stepn完成地铁站到公司的最后一公里。Stepn的设计机制源于Axie,通过回顾Axie数据是否能够推演出未来Stepn的走势? 以及推演出目前Stepn处在生命周期中的哪个阶段?
一、观察维度选取
近日Stepn的推特关注人数突破20w大关,我们不妨从这个点切入;以Axie与Stepn推特受到的关注度一致作为切点,看看Axie同期的数据情况:

对比

Stepn: 2022年4月8日,推特关注数突破20w(截止发稿日2022年4月22日,关注数约为30w)
Axie: 2021年7月15日,推特关注数突破20w(截止发稿日2022年4月22日,关注数约为95w)
二、各维度数据对比
我们以Twitter关注人数达到20W为一个时间节点:选取了2022年4月8号Stepn的数据与2021年7月15日Axie的数据,并从流通市值、IEO收益率、日活、协议收入、链上数据、用户分布、用户收入等角度进行对比。
2.1流通市值对比
Axie: 在2021年7月15日,Axie流通市值达到14亿美金(当时全流通为62亿美金)。代币价格为23刀,Axie在币安launchpad的硬顶大约是300w美金,IEO的价格是0.1u,IEO的收益率为23000%。

对比

Stepn:2022年4月8日,Stepn的流通市值为13亿美金(当时全流通为132亿美金),代币价格为2.2刀,Stepn在币安launchpad的硬顶是420w美金,代币价格是0.01u,IEO的收益率是22000%。

对比

2.2日活对比
Axie日活数据

对比

Axie的日活从5月开始快速增长,从5月份的10w增长到10月份的195w,涨幅将近20倍,从快速增长阶段到峰值,大概用了5-6个月。
Stepn日活数据
根据创始人近期公布的Stepn数据来看,目前日活为20w~30w, 其日活量与Axie的6-7月份的日活量相当。
2.3协议收入对比
Axie: 据Tokenterminal数据显示,2021年7月15日Axie的协议收入为8.2m。不过需要说明的是,Axie的协议收入由两个部分组成:4.25%的NFT市场交易费+繁衍费用。而Stepn不收取繁衍费用,因此我们需要以NFT市场成交额来计算Axie协议收入。
从下图的NFT交易历史数据可以看出,2021年7月15日Axie的NFT市场成交额为30.6m, 手续费=4.25%*30.6m = 1.3m。

对比

Stepn: 2022年4月8号,Stepn的单日协议收入约为103w美金(但是其协议是按照6%的市场交易额收费)    
备注:截止4月14日,Stepn协议收入达到190w美金。

对比

  同为20WTwitter粉的数据对比
2.4 NFT市场交易额对比
Stepn :官方表示,2022 年第一季度通过应用内 NFT 市场交易版税(4%)及手续费(2%)盈利 198,635.62 SOL(约 26,815,807.35 美元),据计算总交易额约为 3310593.67SOL(约 4.46 亿美元)。
Axie:Cryptoslam数据显示

对比

Stepn一季度的交易额大约是Axie 7月份的交易额的70%,Axie的市场交易额从7月~11月都稳定在5亿美金以上,8月峰值将近8.5亿美金。
2.5链上数据对比

对比

4月8号,Stepn的游戏代币GST Holder数量为13w个,考虑到Stepn设定了游戏账户,所有用户升级和mint等操作都在这个账户中,所以实际上的GST holder远比13w多,但是由于无法获取准确数据,我们只能比较两者的增长率。从上图可知,GST地址增长率连续多日在5%以上。

对比

                                             2021年7月15日,SLP的持币地址数为28.5w个                                                      
SLP 地址增长率连续多日在4%以上。两者的持币地址增长率都处在高速增长的阶段。
注:目前Stepn是采用邀请码机制,用户每运动50分钟才能产生一个邀请码。

对比

2.6用户分布对比
Stepn在各国App store 下载量排名(健身类):

对比

据第三方数据显示,2022年3月26日, Stepn在加拿大、德国、澳洲、英国、荷兰等国的App store排名都在100名开外。

对比

在2022年4月17日,Stepn在各国的App Store下载量都已经进入榜单的Top 50,甚至Top 10,其中以日本地区排名最高,达到第5;法国排名第9。当然 ,由于政策等原因,可能有相当一部分下载量实际上是来自中国用户,但也能从一定程度上反应出Stepn在发达国家受到的欢迎程度。
反观Axie,用户主要集中在菲律宾、委内瑞拉等经济相对落后的地区;用户加入只为了赚取收益,维护生活所需,并不是被游戏本身所吸引,故而游戏代币的恶性通胀则不可避免。
2.7 用户收入对比

对比

通过公开数据查询可知,菲律宾近3年的人均GDP大约是3500 usd

对比

日本近3年人均GDP约为40000 usd,是菲律宾的近10倍
从用户群体的分布以及人均GDP收入对比来看,Stepn的用户群体更有经济实力氪金,发达国家的健身渗透率约为15%-20%,是一个庞大的群体。如果这些有真实需求的用户转而使用Stepn, 那么Stepn有机会成为连接传统世界与加密世界的流量入口。
三、总结
通过对比以上数据,我们可以发现Stepn与Axie在各个维度的数据都有惊人的相似之处。唯一的不同点来自于用户群体的分布,Stepn的用户群体相对Axie而言更加优质,这意味着Stepn与Axie有本质上的不同,原因是Stepn的用户对运动的需求是真实存在的,用户在获取奖励的同时发现自己的需求也被满足,那么随着Stepn产品迭代的更加完善,用户粘性也会获得更大的提升。Stepn未来面临的挑战是: 用户习惯的培养周期,是否能够快于收益率下降的周期? 如果收益率回归均值,依然有大量用户保持者对Stepn的热爱,那么这款应用才有可能成为web3的划时代之作。

İlgili Okumalar

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

A Silicon Valley VC's on-the-ground observations of China's startup ecosystem reveal a harsher capital environment forging more aggressive and execution-driven companies. Unlike Silicon Valley's patient capital focused on long-term growth, China's venture landscape is characterized by intense pressure for exits. Startups often face "equity in name, debt in reality" terms with strict timelines and personal founder liability, pushing IPO as the nearly mandatory exit path due to a virtually non-existent M&A market. This high-stakes system, while potentially fostering short-termism, cultivates extreme cost discipline, rapid execution, and formidable commercialization skills—traits evident as these companies expand overseas. The funding ecosystem comprises three main pools: local RMB funds (often government-backed with economic development mandates), domestic USD funds (more founder-friendly, like Sequoia China), and dwindling direct foreign capital. Financial Advisors (FAs) play a crucial intermediary role, packaging deals and navigating China's opaque, relationship-based business networks where platforms like LinkedIn haven't taken root. Underpinning it all is significant state influence through industrial policy, directing capital and incentives toward strategic sectors like semiconductors and AI. The result is a distinct, parallel innovation model—less forgiving than Silicon Valley's, but capable of concentrating resources, accelerating iteration, and producing fiercely competitive companies in targeted industries.

marsbit8 dk önce

Silicon Valley VC's On-the-Ground Observations of Chinese Entrepreneurship: A Harsher Capital Environment Breeding Fiercer Companies

marsbit8 dk önce

SharpLink's Helm: Buying Only, Never Selling, Making ETH Generate Profits Through the Cold Winter

SharpLink co-CEO Joseph Chalom shares his bullish outlook on Ethereum during the recent "Injective Summit 2026." Despite prevailing negative market sentiment, Chalom argues that fundamentals and data tell a different story: Ethereum dominates with over 50% of stablecoin transaction volume, nearly 60% of tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and remains the uncontested leader in DeFi. He attributes the communication gap and lack of confidence partly to the Ethereum Foundation's restructuring. In response, SharpLink, alongside ConsenSys and Bitmain, is funding three key spin-off teams from the Foundation: ETH Labs (for institutional-scale scalability), Ethereum Institutional (for business development and marketing), and EthSystems (for next-gen privacy and compliance solutions). Chalom emphasizes these are critical for accelerating institutional adoption. Regarding SharpLink's strategy, Chalom details a conservative, yield-focused approach. The firm holds 886,725 ETH, acquired with zero leverage or debt. They generate revenue by staking ETH and strategically deploying capital into DeFi protocols via a dedicated fund, aiming for returns above the native staking yield. This contrasts with some Bitcoin-focused firms that have become net sellers. On the broader institutional adoption of tokenization, Chalom sees current progress as just the beginning. He breaks it down into layers: stablecoins as the currency/value layer, tokenized assets as the exposure layer, and DeFi as the execution layer. He predicts regulatory clarity, like the potential Clarity Act, will be a major catalyst. A key future inflection point will be when fiduciary managers prefer tokenized, 24/7 tradable digital assets over traditional "analog" versions due to their programmability and instant settlement. In conclusion, Chalom positions SharpLink not just as an ETH accumulator and yield generator, but as an active "ecosystem steward," funding essential development and marketing initiatives to support Ethereum's long-term growth, which he believes is directly aligned with shareholder interests.

Odaily星球日报9 dk önce

SharpLink's Helm: Buying Only, Never Selling, Making ETH Generate Profits Through the Cold Winter

Odaily星球日报9 dk önce

Ten European Banks Launch Blockchain Initiative RL1

On July 28, 2026, ten European financial institutions launched the Regulated Layer One (RL1) initiative. This open, neutral, and compliance-focused blockchain network is specialized for institutional digital asset operations. The founding members include ABN AMRO, Cecabank, Chartered Investment, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, DekaBank, DZ BANK, LBBW, Natixis CIB, SC Ventures, and Seturion, formed as a European cooperative society (SCE) and led by Henning Voelkel, former head of SWIAT. The network is open to new participants, with NatWest currently in discussions to join. RL1 is built on the SWIAT blockchain, which will remain its software and services provider. The underlying SWIAT network, operational for three years, has processed 50 transactions totaling €700 million. The initiative is described as a collective European effort to create a foundation for a shared, openly and trustworthily managed distributed ledger. Its primary goal is to overcome fragmentation in the regulated financial sector by establishing a neutral, participant-owned, pan-European DLT infrastructure for tokenized assets, digital money, and next-generation financial services. The move responds to growing EU demand for scalable real-world asset (RWA) infrastructure, evidenced by projects like Pontes and Appia. This launch aligns with broader sector growth expectations, including Standard Chartered's forecast for DeFi and RWA market capitalization to reach $2 trillion.

cryptonews.ru14 dk önce

Ten European Banks Launch Blockchain Initiative RL1

cryptonews.ru14 dk önce

Losing the "Anchor": Walsh's Minimalist Communication is Forcing the Market to Price Itself

Losing the "Anchor": Walsh's Minimalist Communication Forces Markets to Self-Price The probability of a rate hike priced into the market ahead of the Thursday meeting is unusually high at 40%. This stems from the new framework under Chairman Walsh, characterized by "data dependence and low communication." Since taking office, Walsh has implemented reforms: drastically shortening statements, removing traditional forward guidance, and emphasizing that statements only provide facts. He has also established working groups to review practices and strongly reiterated a commitment to price stability amid prolonged high inflation. Walsh does not submit a personal dot-plot forecast, urging markets to price based on their own data interpretation rather than reflecting Fed signals. This has removed the traditional "anchor," forcing markets to independently price in the possibility of sudden action in a truly data-driven environment. Consequently, short-term rate volatility and tail risk premiums have increased, as markets pay for protection against a potential sudden hike to reinforce anti-inflation credibility. Specific catalysts supporting this uncertainty include: 1) Iran-related tensions and volatile energy prices raising inflation tail risks, and 2) The new chairman's potential need to establish his anti-inflation credibility with an early, decisive move. In essence, the 40% hike probability reflects the market pricing protection for tail risks under Walsh's new low-guidance framework, compounded by geopolitical and data uncertainties, rather than treating a hike as the base case. The outcome will signal how this new communication paradigm shapes market adaptation. If rates are held steady, focus will shift to September. An unexpected hike would reinforce the "data and credibility first" narrative, prompting a repricing for higher-for-longer rates and tighter financial conditions.

marsbit19 dk önce

Losing the "Anchor": Walsh's Minimalist Communication is Forcing the Market to Price Itself

marsbit19 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片